3.8综合写作 tpo14

jacknonplusUID: 2703793

3.8综合写作 tpo14
时间还是不够，写到最后一个观点的时候已经超时了

The speaker contradicts 3 reasons of the reading that salvage logging benefits both to a damaged
forest and to the economy by providing several explainations that show salvage logging is more
than leaving it alone.

First, the speaker argues that remove the remains of the dead trees is obviously not the right choice for the fresh growth. Unlike the author’s idea that clear the remains would make room for the fresh, the speaker pointed out that this activity would leave the fresh trees into nutrient less condition. So this point totally refutes the first reasons of the reading passage.

Then the speaker goes on to point out that the dead trees would not cause major damage , in contrast, the decaying wood is not only the habitat for insects but only the home of birds which take insects as their main food. As the consequence of cleaning up the dead trees, the harm it brings is more than insects. This rebuts the statement of the reading passage that removing the dead trees contribute to the health of the forest.

Finally, the speaker challenges the validity of the last reason of the reading passage by holding that the additional jobs created for the local residents are temporary…….时间到。。。。。

我是chineseladyUID: 2662783

The speaker contradicts 3 reasons of the reading that salvage logging benefits both to a damaged forest and to the economy by providing several explainations that shows salvage logging is more than leaving it alone这个不是很明白啥意思。。开头很简洁细节稍稍缺乏点

First, the speaker argues that remove the remains of the dead trees is obviously not the right choice for the fresh growth. Unlike the author’s idea that clear the remains would make room for the fresh, the speaker pointed out that this activity would leave the fresh trees into nutrient less condition好！. So this point totally refutes the first reasons of the reading passage.

Then speaker goes on to point out that the dead trees would not cause major damage , in contrast, the decaying wood is not only the habitat for insects but only the home说栖息地比较合适 of birds which take insects as their main food. As the consequence of cleaning up the dead trees, the harm it brings is more than insects后面加个do 是不好点...?. This rebuts the statement of the reading passage that removing the dead trees contribute to the health of the forest 内容基本都写了，好赞个

Finally, the speaker challenges the validity of the last reason of the reading passage by holding that the additional jobs created for the local residents are temporary额，这个首句也蛮长的啊。限时写的很不错了我不是限时写的而且听力也听了2遍 首段写的不如中间的好，内容少了点。句子结构不错的很赞。

jacknonplusUID: 2703793

TPO1 3.10

The speaker contradicted 3 reasons of the reading that companies should offering the employees optional choice for working four days a week by providing several explanations.

The speaker begins to argue that force company the implement the new policy would make the company have financial burdens. Unlike the auother’s saying that this implement would increase company profit, in fact it would make the company hire more people, then comes along with their  training fees, medical benefits, more office space and more new computers for them. As a consequence, four-day workweek policy would dramatically cut down the company’s profit. So this point totally refutes the first reasons in the reading passage.

Then the speaker goes on to point out that four-day employees would not feel rested and alert, instead, they have to do more work in a week. The speaker claimed that the 4 day workers have to do their job usually they finished in 5 days to achieve the expection from the boss. That mean they have to work over time which was quite opposite from the reading.

Finally, the speaker challenges the validity of the last reasons of the reading passage by holding the point that 4-day week policy would reduce the employees’ life quality. The speaker use the instance that when the economic situation turns down, 4-day workers are more likely to lose their jobs, and more importantly, 5-day workers are much easier to be promoted to the management position than 4-day workers just because their work time is longer. This rebuts the statement of the passage that 4-day workers would be better for emplyees.