- 最后登录
- 2017-6-13
- 在线时间
- 961 小时
- 寄托币
- 1441
- 声望
- 118
- 注册时间
- 2008-3-28
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 帖子
- 41
- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 1155
- UID
- 2476232
 
- 声望
- 118
- 寄托币
- 1441
- 注册时间
- 2008-3-28
- 精华
- 2
- 帖子
- 41
|
Argument193: 429 words 30 minutes
The Department of Education in the state of Attra recommends that high school students be assigned homework every day. Yet a recent statewide survey of high school math and science teachers calls the usefulness of daily homework into question. In the district of Sanlee, 86 percent of the teachers reported assigning homework three to five times a week, whereas in the district of Marlee, less than 25 percent of the teachers reported assigning homework three to five times a week. Yet the students in Marlee earn better grades overall and are less likely to be required to repeat a year of school than are the students in Sanlee. Therefore, all teachers in our high schools should assign homework no more than twice a week, if at all.
The department of Education in the Attra state puts forward an advice that all high schools should not assign homework more than twice a week. To support the advice, the result of a recent statewide survey focusing on high school math and science is cited. Although teachers in district of Sanlee assign more frequent homework than those in district of Marlee, the students in Marlee earn better grades and are less likely to be required to repeat a year of school than those in Sanlee. However, a close scrutiny reveals several flaws in the argument, which lend little credibility to this recommendation.
First of all, the state wide survey is focus on high school math and science teachers, which obviously ignores teachers of other subjects, like language and history. Even if the result of the survey is statistically reliable, the recommendation is only available for teachers in high school math and science, rather than all teachers in every subject.
Next, although the survey is a statewide one, the result of only two districts is cited here, which can not be good representatives of all districts in the state. It is quite possible that the same result may not be found in other districts. Moreover, the result does not provide any information of the rest 75 percent of teachers in Marlee who do not report their frequency of assigning homework. The more those teachers assign home work to students, the less credible the evidence appears. Without proving that other districts are identical to the two cited here, and providing more information of the rest 75 percent teachers in Marlee, the evidence is unconvincing at all.
Then, the author attributes all the difference in grades to the frequency of homework assigned without ruling out other factors that could have influence. For example, the teaching equipment and the teachers' quality also contribute a lot to the grades. Moreover, there is not sign showing that the two districts use the same standard of giving grades and requiring students to repeat a year of school. Presumably, the district of Marlee tends to give higher grades and does not treat students who receive poor grades as strict as Sanlee.
In sum, to better support the recommendation, the Department of Education should provide more convincing evidence, including teachers in all subjects and all districts. Meanwhile, other possibilities that may influence the grades should be excluded in order to maintain the credibility of the survey. To better assess the argument, the standard according to which teachers in different districts use is needed to be identical to further support the survey.
|
|