- 最后登录
- 2010-4-10
- 在线时间
- 2 小时
- 寄托币
- 108
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2010-2-28
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 96
- UID
- 2771489

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 108
- 注册时间
- 2010-2-28
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
4.82
Human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals.
Nowadays, more and more animals are facing the situation that they maybe extinct in the near future. Due to it, many people think that human beings should give up some lands of farming, housing and manufacturing for those endangered animals to live in. However, I think it is not necessary for people to do that, as it can not help endangered animals fundamentally. They can use other ways to help those endangered animals except saving lands for them. Also, human's demand for land is extremely serious.
To begin with, saving lands for endangered animals can not help them survive. According to the theory of Darwin, the nature will choose the animals which adapt to it during the evolution. The endangered animals are not adapting the environment currently so that they facing the situation of dying out. Even if human save lands for them, we can not help them survive fundamentally. By way of illustration I will refer the example of southern China tigers in my country. They are recognized as endangered animals and rare animals by government several decades ago. Consequently, the government saves a large forest for them to live in. While after so many years, they still die out and no one ever find them again. This experience tells us, saving land for those endangered animals are not so important.
In addition, for the repaid growth of population of human beings, land become a more and more important problem. Especially in some developing countries, the situation is serious. For example, in Shanghai which I live in, many people can not even afford for a small apartment. In most families, all their salaries are not enough to buy one square meters in the downtown area due to the high price of housing. Therefore, I think it is important for people to develop more lands for housing. What's more, in order to improve people's living conditions, the demands of farmland and factory are also quiet high. As a result, human needs for the land are more important than saving lands for animals.
I am not denying that the endangered animals are not important. Human can use other methods to protect them, such as building zoo for them and using scientific technology to help them raise offspring. These ways are more useful than just saving lands.
In conclusion, comparing with saving lands for endangered animals, human needs or farmland, housing, and industry are more important. Otherwise, many human would have to live a hard life also those animals can not survive in the end. Human can come up with other methods to help the endangered animals fundamentally. |
|