issue69 欢迎来拍

mseyjUID: 2730706

甚觉自己表达能力欠缺，可时日已不久矣。

God，what can I do to improve this situation?

Issue 69

Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development

Nowadays, there is a broad discussion about whether or not government should place restrictions on scientific research and development. Some argue that scientific research should be set into a free situation; otherwise, scientist cannot achieve significant success. However, in my view, the government should set up restrictions to some extent, while dealing with the specific and different researches based on a case-by-case analysis.

Admittedly, free atmosphere is beneficial/important to scientific research. Since scientists could make full use of their imaginary, creative thinking; and practice without hesitance, it [url=]will be[/url] very favorable to innovation and getting a more vital achievement. Otherwise, if government establishes certain amount of restrictions, scientists do not want to, or cannot put their profound ideas to reality. Definitely, this case would prevent the development of the science and the whole society. For example, Einstein, one of the greatest scientists in physics, attains the top of his career until he went to the United States, a free country, from Germany - an arbitrary nation at that time. It is truly that the free atmosphere in American promotes his great idea.

However, government could not place no restrictions and let the scientific research be totally free. Appropriate supervision is necessary. As we all know, some results of scientific research could be (very) extremely profound, while others be (very) highly controversial or even detrimental to the society. The latter must be regulated anyhowthe nuclear energy which is a double-edged sword for an instance. Admittedly, it is a renewable energy and very helpful for human, but once being leaked out from the factory, [url=]it would cause thousands of people injured, and its explosion could utterly destroy the earth.[/url][F4] In this case, government should take the responsibility to oversee the manufacturing and pertaining of the nuclear energy.

Then, you may wonder,  [url=]
what should we do to the scientific research after all?[/url] In my mind, the government should relax the restraint, while supervising appropriately, and establishing different policies according to different researches. Let us get down to some specific ones. For the beneficial researches such as studies on solar and wind energy which provide human beings a more clean and reproducible energy when hardly being harmful to the world, we should in any way loosen the limitation and encourage the scientist. On the other hand, putting restrictions on some controversial researches is necessary. For instance, the clone technology could produce fetus with only a parent which challenges the human's moral and ethic norm. Hence, due to the disparity of the researches, we should take a variety of measures.

It is true that scientific research need free atmosphere, but we should concern more about the possible results that they would take to us. Thus, government's restrictions and regulations are necessary for our good.

zhusichao88UID: 2786754

楼主问你一下，这个题目以前同主题写作的活动搞过吗？我没搜到帖子...

plukaUID: 2721764

Nowadays, there is a broad discussion about whether or not government should place restrictions on scientific research and development. Some argue that scientific research should be set into a free situation; otherwise, scientist cannot achieve significant success. However, in my view, the government should set up restrictions to some extent, while dealing with the specific and different researches based on a case-by-case analysis.

Admittedly, free atmosphere is beneficial/important（选择题？自己选一个再来） to scientific research. Since scientists could make full use of their imaginary, creative thinking; and practice without hesitance, it [url=]will be[/url] very favorable to innovation and getting a more vital achievement. Otherwise, if（建议用虚拟语态） government establishes certain amount of restrictions（全文主旨曰要set up restrictions to some extent,这里说certain amount of restrictions有害，对照起来有点别扭。建议明确此处的certain，直接说excessive就好）, scientists do not want to, or cannot put their profound ideas to reality. Definitely, this case would prevent the development of the science and the whole society. For example, Einstein, one of the greatest scientists in physics, attains the top of his career until he went to the United States（语态一致）, a free country, from Germany - an arbitrary nation at that time（差不多了，若有时间可发展一下。德国是如何限制的，美国是如何自由的，爱氏对德国的制衡的态度和结果？）. It is truly（副词不可做表语） that the free atmosphere in American promotes his great idea.

However, government could not place no restrictions and let the scientific research be totally free. Appropriate supervision is necessary. As we all know, some results of scientific research could be (very) extremely profound, while others be (very)（这个括号是啥意思） highly controversial or even detrimental to the society. The latter must be regulated anyhow（缺成分，或者这是两句话？）the nuclear energy which is a double-edged sword for an instance. Admittedly, it is a renewable energy and very helpful for human, but once being leaked out from the factory, [url=]it would cause thousands of people injured, and its explosion could utterly destroy the earth.[/url][F4] In this case, government should take the responsibility to oversee the manufacturing and pertaining（此词何意？） of the nuclear energy.（观点是，A有益，B有害，所以对于B我们要管理。例证是C有益又有害，所以对于C我们要管理。。。这样一想貌似也OK，只是仍让俺觉得不自然= =（原本是AB两个主体，合成到C一个了，这样子好像在证“事物有双面性，所以我们都要好好管理”，而没有“将事物分类再管理坏的一方”的感觉了））

Then, you may wonder,  [url=]what should we do to the scientific research after all（此短语此处合适否？）?[/url] In my mind, the government should relax the restraint, while supervising appropriately, and establishing different policies according to different researches. Let us get down to some specific ones. For the beneficial researches such as studies on solar and wind energy which provide human beings a more clean and reproducible energy when hardly being harmful to the world, we should in any way loosen the limitation and encourage the scientist. On the other hand, putting restrictions on some controversial researches is necessary. For instance, the clone technology could produce fetus with only a parent which challenges the human's moral and ethic norm. Hence, due to the disparity of the researches, we should take a variety of measures.（此段仅说理，没啥论证好谈的，仅就此观点发表下个人意见。私以为区分研究是beneficial还是harmful或者controversial是相当困难的。拿本段中的例子来说。作者认为新能源研究是好的，但事实上新能源研究了几十年，开销巨大而成果寥寥，某些政府对其的资助甚至被认为是浪费税金。由此可见beneficial是个很难定义并且有些主观的东西，很可能也落入controversial的境地。某种意义上讲，任何研究在初期都是controversial的，结果还没定呢，怎么说它是好是坏？更何况还有核能那样的双刃剑：又怎知新能源等日后不会也成为双刃剑？其二，说estabilishing 不同的政策应对不同的research有点不切实际：研究何其多也，policymaker之智何其有限也！虽则此处为俺个人意见，但作者可以考虑一下能否在文中回答俺这些问题，不也就能借此加强自己文章的说服力了么）

It is true that scientific research need free atmosphere, but we should concern more about the possible results that they would take to us. Thus, government's restrictions and regulations are necessary for our good.


全篇框架出来了，但私以为例子的挖掘，观点的深入还有进步的空间，加油~
以上