【Flyer杀G作文组】6.27-Issue48-By CC

师大菜菜UID: 2838404

48. The study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. The most significant events and trends in history were made possible not by the famous few, but by groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten.


提纲:

1.
少数杰出的人可以极大的促进历史的发展, 我们应该关注英雄。
2.
但是，英雄离不开人民群众的支持
3.
历史的发展带有必然性，那就是满足广大人民的要求。


1.
Some outstanding ones can greatly speed up the progress of history or technology development.
2.
However, making contributions to people of contemporary, these top nobles and elites cannot leave the support of common people.
3.
What’s more, the development of society and technology has its own historical inevitability which is meet mass people’s requirements.


Does the study of history should place more emphasis on groups of people rather than on individuals? The speaker thinks so, for the reason that instead of the latter, it is the former who made most significant events and trends possible. Generally I agree with the speaker’s idea. Although the famous few can propel history greatly, it is groups of people who determine the history.

First of all, some outstanding ones can greatly speed up the progress of society or technology development. With more profound views and courage, some individuals make great contributions, which even change the whole world .In the field of science and technology, thanks to some elites who have the high intellect and steadfast determination, the old system of knowledge was broken again and again. Newton proposed three universal laws of motion which is the foundation of classics physics. These laws were not to be improved upon for more than 200 years. It was Einstein who modified the laws and completely changed people’s views of time and space. Then turn to the field of politics, there are also some individuals play important roles in the process of society development. Take Lincoln for example, without his wisdom leading and charming personality, the South might have not been able to fight the North in the Civil War.

However, making contributions to people of contemporary, these top nobles and elites cannot leave the support of common people. There is no one is powerful enough to do something without the mass people’s proponent. Let’s still take Einstein for example, his great findings were also based on the findings of the other physicians in that time. Leaving other people’s results and support, he might be not able to make any great contributions to physics. And Lincoln’s success was also gained together with other famous politicians at that time. Therefore, individuals are crucial factors in social development. However, they cannot exert their will independently of the social conditions and the assistant of the mass people.

What’s more, the development of society and technology has its own historical inevitability which is meet mass people’s requirements. Even without the contribution of few elites, the direction of history development would not be changed completely. In history, the role of individuals can be decisive at certain key moment. However, those individuals just speed up the progress of history. Without them, the development of history may be slower, may be changed into different forms, the direction of history development cannot be changed in nature. In Einstein’s time, with the development of technology, it has its own historical inevitability that someone had a new finding in physics. Even the one was not Einstein, there would still be others who make his contributions. The same to Lincoln, without him, the south may be defeated in the Civil War. But ending slavery is a goal that will be sooner or later achieved by mass people. Thus the most of history is still determined by mass people and their requirements.


To sum up, in the process of history, both the outstanding ones and mass play important roles. Elites can promote the development of history, but never change the direction of history. The most trends in history were made possible by groups of people. Elites just represent the willingness of common people. When studying history, we should not only focus on individuals, but also on the groups of people, who are the real master of history.


没有限时间，词汇量还是很小....

红绡UID: 2839171

1# 师大菜菜

Does the study of history should place more emphasis on groups of people rather than on individuals? The speaker thinks so, for the reason that instead of the latter, it is the former who made most significant events and trends possible. Generally I agree with the speaker’s idea. Although the famous few can propel history greatly, it is groups of people who determine the history.

First of all, some outstanding ones can greatly speed up the progress of society or technology development. With more profound views and courage, some individuals make great contributions, which even change the whole world .In the field of science and technology, thanks to some elites who have the high intellect and steadfast determination, the old system of knowledge was broken again and again. Newton proposed three universal laws of motion which is the foundation of classics physics. These laws were not to be improved upon for more than 200 years (it seems more that 200 years before these laws being improved). It was Einstein who modified the laws and completely changed people’s views of time and space. Then turn to the field of politics, there are also some individuals play important roles in the process of society development. Take Lincoln for example, without his wisdom leading and charming personality (leading of his wisdom,个人魅力？可以直接影响美国内战？这个太跳跃了), the South might have not been able to fight the North in the Civil War.

However, making contributions to people of contemporary（contemporary people）, these top nobles and elites cannot leave the support of common people. There is no one is powerful enough to do something without the mass people’s proponent(mass本身就有“群众的”的意思，而且proponent是支持者，拥护者的意思，赘述。建议：public support/the support of the masses). Let’s still take Einstein for example(as an example),
his(whose) great findings were also based on the findings of the other physicians in that time. Leaving other people’s results and support, he might be not able to make any great contributions to physics. And Lincoln’s success was also gained together with other famous politicians at that time.（按这句话的说法，其它著名的政治家被你归为群众的行列了，但是个人认为他们也属于优秀个人的范畴） Therefore, individuals are crucial factors in social development. However, they cannot exert their will independently of the social conditions and the assistant of the mass people.（这两句话用让步句型更好，Even though individuals are crucial factors in social development, therefore, they cannot exert their own will regardless of social temporal situations or isolating the masses.）

findings用的太多

What’s more, the development of society and technology has its own historical inevitability which is meet mass people’s requirements. Even without the contribution of few elites, the direction of history development would not be changed completely. In history, the role of individuals can be decisive at certain key moment. However, those individuals just speed up the progress of history. Without them, the development of history may be slower, may be changed into different forms, the direction of history development cannot be changed in nature. In Einstein’s time, with the development of technology, it has its own historical inevitability that someone had a new finding in physics. Even (even if )the one was not Einstein, there would still be others who make his contributions(the analogical contributions). The same to Lincoln, without him, the south may be defeated in the Civil War. But ending slavery is a goal that will be sooner or later achieved by mass people. Thus the most of history is still determined by mass people and their requirements.


To sum up, in the process of history, both the outstanding ones and mass play important roles. Elites can promote the development of history, but never change the direction of history. The most trends in history were made possible by groups of people. Elites just represent the willingness of common people. When studying history, we should not only focus on individuals, but also on the groups of people, who are the real master of history.