寄托天下
楼主: 德芬郡奶油
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[习作点评] 德芬郡奶油的ISSUE收集+点评簿 [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
1555
寄托币
14569
注册时间
2009-4-17
精华
18
帖子
343

美版版主 Cancer巨蟹座 荣誉版主 AW活动特殊奖 GRE梦想之帆 GRE斩浪之魂 GRE守护之星 US Assistant US Applicant

16
发表于 2010-7-8 23:19:19 |只看该作者
友情帮顶~
已有 1 人评分声望 收起 理由
德芬郡奶油 + 1 MUA!

总评分: 声望 + 1   查看全部投币


Die luft der Freiheit weht
the wind of freedom blows

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
7
寄托币
459
注册时间
2010-4-8
精华
0
帖子
1
17
发表于 2010-7-10 10:44:20 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 agnes2010 于 2010-7-10 23:06 编辑

ID:agnes2010


TOPIC: ISSUE17 - "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."

Law is a system of rules, shaping politics, economics and society in numerous ways and serves as a primary social mediator of relations between people. Just as Lady Justice represents, law is to give impartial trial and to be just. However, agreement can hardly be reached when people judge a law just or not. Therefore, to make the society live in harmonious, it is crucial for citizens to follow the law and order no matter how they consider law.

Each person may hold his or her own view on the fairness of a law. Their criteria in the judgment differ from each others since people from different countries share different social and cultural background or view on value. For instance, if you are a devout Catholic, you should not get divorced. Since Ireland is a country with lots of Catholics, people there may consider the rule as a way to show respect to love. Yet, people in Thailand can hardly agree with the law as plural marriage is very common in their traditional life. Due to the disparate cultural background, people from both country share extremely different view on marriage and both of them will judge the law in the other country as unfair.As a result, when people are judging whether the laws are impartial or not, they can not avoid being prejudiced and preferring what benefits them. That is to say, it is hard to judge laws by human strength.

Although human factors alone can not be the criteria judging the fairness of laws, whether the laws are unbiased or not can be proved by the test of time. In the ancient China, females, labeled as labor in a family, were not allowed to go to study or take part in imperial examinations. Only males have the opportunities to enjoy successful status in the society. However, no females considered it as unjust at that time, and they got accustomed to their lives. It had been a long time until the law was abolished. Nowadays, both females and males can have the equal opportunities to get educated or trained. After enduring the test of time, such a law turned out to be unjust in new period. So the passing time and history can be the best tester.

However, some people will disobey or restrict the current law as they think the law is biased, which may break the present law system. Since every law is the collection of rules imposed by authority, people who disobey it will be punished by force of law. It is advisable for everyone to follow all the laws and offer a proposal to the legislative branch if there seems to be some biased laws. When every citizen turns a blind eye to laws, the public security order will be poor and the overall smooth development of a society can never been achieved. What’s more, the concerning legislative branch should not overlook what citizens suggests. They must take everything useful into consideration and make an impartial conclusion in order to prove current laws.

To sum up, the standard of biased and unbiased laws is not a straightforward issue. No matter how people consider laws, obeying it should be high on the list to ensure the public security order in a society. On the premise of that, both citizens and the legislative branch should work together to set more effective laws.

使用道具 举报

RE: 德芬郡奶油的ISSUE收集+点评簿 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
德芬郡奶油的ISSUE收集+点评簿
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1117327-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部