【Flyer杀G小组】7月12日 Issue56--By candygege

candygegeUID: 2792059

56. "Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."

Governments resources are so limited that may not solve all the matters at the same time. It has to choose one from the problems bucket according to many factors, like degrees of significance and relativity between the matter and the future of the country, and then overlook or postpone the rest ones. Unsurprisingly, most people like to compare the immediate problems with the anticipated problems, which seems like opposite to each other, such as environment and economy development. But, the two are not opposite. We should call for a balance between solving the immediate problems of today and the anticipated problems of the future.
   Generally, providing that when the governments face two issues to solve: one is immediate, while the other profits in the future, no fixed answer exist. The governors need to profoundly consider the new condition, evaluating the importance of two matters.
   Certainly, time is an essential factor should be take care. The immediate problems usually attract more public attentions, because they conneted tightly with the citizens' happiness and profits of the time. Not everyone has sufficient foresight especially when they encounter the real benefits of their own. For the stability and hormany of the whole society, sometimes, the government have to solve the immediate problems. What is more, today is the bottom of tomorrow, so if today's immediate questions can not be solved timely, it is likely to influence or destroy the further development. Also, if you let alone today's problems to tomorrow, it may become more difficult and complicated that need more cost. Hence, the governments generally tend to focus on the immediate problems first.
   However, they are not enough to be reasons to let us ignore the anticipated problems of the future. For example, it is a real conflict: protecting environment for the next generation or developing economy for contemporary person. At first, the quantity of people's lives was too low to consider protecting environment. To survive was the biggest problem they had to face, so it was unsurprised to see excess lumbering, mining resources without limit, etc.. Now, the situation has changed. In some developing places, people come across the same questions as we mentioned before, survival pressure without pollution; while in some developed places, the social need to continue developing but the environment which has been destroyed by past excess expendation,  would be breakdown without any further measures to protect. To the governments, on one side, they have to reap as they has sown, dealing with the pollution, which is the aftermath of the past unsolved problems; on the other side, they have responsibility to make progress of the economy. Obviously, the past unsolved "anticipated problems" become today's "immediate problems", however, the immediate problem is still existed. It is likely to be a dead-circle, unless we find a new method.
   The method is to find a balance between the immediate matter and the anticipated matter. Government as the distributor of public resources should not ignore anticipated problems, should have forsight to allocate funds proactively, and carry the sustainability policy, which is a characteristic of a process or state that can be maintained at a certain level indefinitely, into execution. Also take the environment and economy as a example, the government should find a balance between the two, that means developing economy on the basis of keeping environment from pollution. Take a futher example, SARS, when the governments focus on the sick men, they also spend much money on the research, which can not gain now but have long-term merits.
   To sum up, governments should pay attention on solving the immediate problems of today, but trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future as well.

happy小姐UID: 2742701

56. "Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."----BY Candygege

Governments resources(？) are so limited that may not solve all the matters at the same time. It has to choose one from the problems bucket according to many factors, like degrees of significance and relativity between the matter and the future of the country, and then overlook or postpone the rest ones.

Unsurprisingly, most people like to compare the immediate problems with the anticipated problems, which seems like opposite to each other, such as environment and economy development. But, the two are not opposite. We should call for a balance between solving the immediate problems of today and the anticipated problems of the future.
   Generally, providing that when the governments face two issues to solve: one is immediate, while the other profits in the future, no fixed answer exist. The governors(去掉s) need to profoundly consider the new condition, evaluating the importance of two matters.
   Certainly, time is an essential factor should be take care. The immediate problems usually attract more public attentions, because they conneted tightly with the citizens' happiness and profits of the time（？）. Not everyone has sufficient foresight especially when they encounter the real benefits of their own. For the stability and hormany of the whole society, sometimes, the government have to solve the immediate problems. What is more, today is the bottom of tomorrow, so if today's immediate questions can not be solved timely, it is likely to influence or destroy the further development. Also, if you let alone today's problems to tomorrow, it may become more difficult and complicated that need more cost. Hence, the governments generally tend to focus on the immediate problems first.（time需要和其他因素结合起来，政府才能集中全力）
   However, they are not enough to be reasons to let us ignore the anticipated problems of the future. For example, it is a real conflict: protecting environment for the next generation or（？）
developing economy for contemporary person. At first, the quantity of people's lives was too low to consider protecting environment. To survive was the biggest problem they had to face, so it was unsurprised to see excess lumbering, mining resources without limit, etc.. Now, the situation has changed. In some developing places, people come across the same questions as we mentioned before, survival pressure without pollution; while in some developed places, the social need to continue developing but the environment which has been destroyed by past excess expendation,  would be breakdown without any further measures to protect. To the governments, on one side, they have to reap as they has sown, dealing with the pollution, which is the aftermath of the past unsolved problems; on the other side, they have responsibility to make progress of the economy. Obviously, the past unsolved "anticipated problems" become today's "immediate problems", however, the immediate problem is still existed. It is likely to be a dead-circle, unless we find a new method.
   The method is to find a balance between the immediate matter and the anticipated matter. Government as the distributor of public resources should not ignore anticipated problems, should have forsight to allocate funds practively, and carry the sustainability policy, which is a characteristic of a process or state that can be maintained at a certain level indefinitely, into execution.（是不是太长了呢。本句话是该文的核心，即解决方法矛盾的方法，是否需要与第一段中心论点相呼应呢）
Also take the environment and economy as a example, the government should find a balance between the two, that(改为which？) means developing economy on the basis of keeping environment from pollution. Take a futher example, SARS, when the governments focus on the sick men, they also spend much money on the research, which can not gain now but have long-term merits.(我觉得这个例证有点小不妥，SARS期间,government focus on the sick men 和 spend much money on the research 都属于政府为了对抗非典这个短期问题的措施。建议：把sick men和spend much money on the research看成同为解决immediate problems，再列举当年发生的有关 anticipated problems 的政策事件。)
   To sum up, governments should pay attention on solving the immediate problems of today, but trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future as well.（结尾可以再充实一些，范文中绝大部分结尾都在70字以上。建议：是不是可以把开头段的影响因素再复述，作为证明自己论据完整的条件。）

句型变换很丰富！有一个句子有些长修改下就更好了。观点属于平衡观点，构思很好，文笔很流畅！有一点疑问中心论点是段首句，governments have to choose one from the problems, 本文的重要论证内容是否应该为如何进行选择及选择的依据呢？可能涉及到内容结构上的微调。