Oct 2004; section 2; 13

lily88888UID：2828533

The solution to any environmental problem that is not the result of government mismanagement can only lie in major changes in consumer habits. But major changes in consumer habits will occur only if such changes are economically enticing. As a result, few serious ecological problems will be solved unless the solution are made economically enticing.

The conclusion drawn in the argument above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

A. Few serious ecological problems are result of government mismanagement.
B. No environmental problems that stem from government mismanagement have solution that are economically feasible.
C. Major changes in consumer habits can be made economically enticing.
D. Most environmental problems that are not the result of government mismanagement are major ecological problems.
E. Few serious ecological problems can be solved by major changes in consumer habits.

duijinxiaoziUID：2585955

题干
solution （not  mismanagement）-----》major changes in consumer habits
major changes in consumer habits-----》economically enticing
合并：
solution （not  mismanagement）-----》economically enticing
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
结论：
Few serious ecological problems will be solved unless the solution are made economically enticing.
的逻辑结构：
非 solved （Few serious ecological problems）------》economically enticing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
solution （not  mismanagement） = 非 solved （Few serious ecological problems）
即：
非 solved  （mismanagement）= 非 solved （Few serious ecological problems）
即：
mismanagement = Few serious ecological problems
----------------------------------
（A）