【issue7】【我们的小组】 习作

nature347UID: 2751175

."The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records."
7． 数码相机可以精确地拍摄当代人们的生活，它的重要性已经超过了纸笔记录。

Words:502


Video camera, offering people with an accurate record of one aspect for one event, takes an important place by this means. However, if depending too much on it , we won’t have
profound records for events because there’re certain features of the writing record while the video record cannot.



There’s no denying that the record of the video camera is accurate and objective which make it indispensible in some realm.
The video camera can record the progress of one thing honestly, which is pretty useful
under certain circumstance. Take the trial of prisoner for example, with the record of video camera, the rate of beating the prisoner
decreases a lot and it’s hard for the prisoner to
what he has confess first, both of which are obviously helpful to keep the fairness of the judgment.
Another interesting thing is that
the shop and store with a video camera are less likely to suffer from the theft. The video camera
as
a way to record might have a supervise power on people because the record is so subjective that cannot be denied.
However, if we lay too much emphasize on the record video camera, we’ll be prevented from having a deep and insight view of the event it recorded and
a endurable amount of money is required.
First of all, the video camera just record the progress of the event, it’s difficult for this kind of record to contain the background and the effect of the event. In other words, it may be a little superficial . In the era of the information, seas of pictures and videos
are in front of an ordinary person, it’s hard for one to judge and learn what’s behind the event just by the record, a well-written paper record with analysis is much helpful than tons of the videos and pictures.
Indeed, the written record performs good and stable at the aspect that the video camera can hardly do
such as analysis and economies on
the expense. The written record may be more friendly to the reader because it’s requires less time and it’s much easy for the reader to seize the main points such as the meaning and purpose of the events. Furthermore,
a lot of money are saved choosing the written record rather than the video record. In many cases, it’s not necessary to get video record for one event and the written record is the best choice for saving money and easy to operate
as it don’t require certain equipment.

Both of the video record and the written record is important as they have different benefits and shortcomings.
They are complementary, video record is accurate, straight-forward but relatively expensive and superficial while the written record is summarize, deep inside but subjective. I believe it’s maybe the reason why the Pulitzer Prizes concern both the picture report and the written report. Choose and even combine the two kinds of record according to the requirement is a recommended way
to describe an event to my concern.

huashiyiqikeUID: 2674177

Video camera, offering people with an accurate record of one aspect for one event, takes an important place by this means.
Video camera takes an important place by offering people with an accurate record of one aspect for one event. However, if depending too much on it , we won’t have
profound records for events because there’re certain features of the writing record while the video record cannot.
There’s no denying that the record of the video camera is accurate and objective which makes it indispensible in some realm.
The video camera can record the progress of one thing honestly, which is pretty useful
under certain circumstance. Take the trial of prisoner for example, with the superviseof video camera,it has been proved that科学依据 the rate of beating the prisoner
decreases a lot and it’s hard for the prisoner to??
what he has confessed first, both of which are obviously helpful to keep the fairness of the judgment.
Another interesting thing is that
the shop and store with a video camera are less likely to suffer from the theft. The video camera as a way to record might have a supervising power on people because the record is so subjective that cannot be denied.
However, if we lay too much emphasize on the record video camera, we’ll be prevented from having a deep and insightful view of the event it recorded and
an endurable amount of money is required.
First of all, the video camera just record the progress of the event, it’s difficult for this kind of record to contain the background and the effect of the event. In other words, it may be a little superficial . In the era of the information, seas of pictures and videos
are in front of an ordinary person, it’s hard for one to judge and learn what’s behind the event just by the record, a well-written paper record with analysis is much helpful than tons of the videos and pictures.
Indeed, the written record performs good and stablewell and stably at the aspect that the video camera can hardly do such as analysis and economies on
the expense. The written record may be more friendly to the reader because it’s不规范 it isrequires less time and it’s much easy for the reader to seize the main points such as the meaning and purpose of the events. Furthermore,
a lot of money are saved choosing the written record rather than the video record. too vague，in details In many cases, it’s not necessary to get video record for one event and the written record is the best choice for saving money and easy to operate
as it don’t require certain equipment.
Both of the video record and the written record is important as they have different benefits and shortcomings.
They are complementary, video record is accurate, straight-forward but relatively expensive and superficial while the written record is summarize？, deep inside butas well as subjective. I believe thismaybe the reason why the Pulitzer Prizes concern both the picture report and the written report. Choose and even combine the two kinds of record according to the requirement is a recommended way
to describe an event to my concern.in my view




文章层次清晰
语法错误较多，缩写不规范这点需要注意
论据很好，但没处理好，论证过于家常化，要换一种更科学更严谨的态度论证