argument 开头段到底要不要复述题目？

yihaoheroUID: 2867555

自己感觉复述题目很浪费时间，但看北美范文上都有复述。虽然复述可以充字数，但感觉不如更多的把时间用在后面的正文段中。征集意见~

纠结帝UID: 2755596

我觉得完完全全的复述是没必要的。对于逻辑比较简单的题，开头可以笼统地批评一下，或者指出错误的焦点；对于逻辑结构复杂的题，比如A推B，B推C的题，开头可以理一理思路。
个人见解~

Milo1990UID: 2771786

其实我也是很困惑，要换一种说法改写题目，每次都要花挺多时间的。

但是，基本上所有的模板都是要复述一下题目的 （ 表打我~）
然后也顺便拜求一下 不一样的A开头~

nuaaskyUID: 2615912

支持2楼观点，做分析，给自己后面的批斗做好铺垫。

yihaoheroUID: 2867555

谢谢诸位~还是老老实实的写吧……

Milo1990UID: 2771786

177
The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette, a local newspaper.
"Membership in Oak City's Civic Club—a club whose primary objective is to discuss local issues—should continue to be restricted to people who live in Oak City. People who work in Oak City but who live elsewhere cannot truly understand the business and politics of the city. It is important to restrict membership to city residents because only residents pay city taxes and therefore only residents understand how the money could best be used to improve the city. At any rate, restricting membership in this way is unlikely to disappoint many of the nonresidents employed in Oak City, since neighboring Elm City's Civic Club has always had an open membership policy, and only twenty-five nonresidents have joined Elm City's Club in the last ten years."

1---no evidence is given to demonstrate that those people who work in O C but live elsewhere cannot really understand the business and politics of the city. Maybe most of the businessmen in O C come from other cities. If it is the case, it is impossible that they do not truly known the situation of OC. On the contrary, they are just those who are aware of the business and politics there most clearly.

2---the author unfairly assumes that only those local residents pay taxes to its government, which lacks evidence. As the author points out in the argument, there are people works in O C but they do not live there. Then the possibility that some local residents living in O C work in other places exists. It is highly possible that they do not understand the local business clearly as expected.

3---the author conducts a false analogy between E C and OC .He or she ignores the differences of them. Though in the past ten years only 25 nonresidents were included in the E C'Club, no information indicates that they did not play an important role in the club because the total number of members in the club is not pointed out. If there are 50 members in the club totally during the past years, conclusion will be reached that nonresidents should not be ignored in the process of electing members. On the other hand, if it is true in E C the nonresidents are not important/are not dominated as supposed, the detailed situation concerning those nonresidents in O C remains unknown, which causes the claim unconvincing. Thus the suggestion will lead to disappointment and discontent of nonresidents in O C.

今天看到有范文是这样写的，不知道值不值得学习啊~

hugeseaUID: 190158

自己感觉复述题目很浪费时间，但看北美范文上都有复述。虽然复述可以充字数，但感觉不如更多的把时间用在后面的正文段中。征集意见~
yihaohero 发表于 2010-7-31 12:35

复述不是必须的

久久天UID: 2822469

在北美范文的前言部分提到：2.我在每篇文章的第一段中都扼要复述了题目，不过你要记住，读你文章的人不会指望、也不想要你在文章中复述题目。所以你开头第一段要尽量简洁。

chengchen85UID: 2410576

完了，我考试的时候复述了一下，后面有点来不及展开的，可能也是我打字慢