高频issue51 求PP

zxwhy825UID: 2668443

题目：ISSUE51 - "Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student."
字数：413
用时：00:45:00
日期：2010-8-4 下午 04:55:42

【i原文】As the famous saying of Kongzi,one of the greatest philosophiest of East going,"Students should be taught naturally according to its character and talent", the speaker's assertion seems right.Does such education, laying
more stress on the development of students, perfectly achieve the goal of education? Without the discussion of objective of education, we cannot gain a hasty conclusion.
What does education aim at? I believe, the education tries to promote the development of society,by
passing the current knowledge and value to students, preparing them for the work and life in their future. Maybe someone agrue that only when individual ability and interest are fully inspired and developed, will the society gain its better future, that is "the whole society's best rely on individual best ".Is that right?
Answer varies with time. In the past, when the begin of human society and culture, the number of human are much less than that at present. Natural and social resource is adequate according to the population. The develop of society,showing the effetiveness of education, rely on mostly on the few people.In that ambience,totally neglecting interpersonal competence,the answer is "yes".
On the contrary, nowadays,the answes is "no": when the number is counted by billion, the resource left for individual is so little to take into account ,individual needs and interests of each students, to plan our education. What's worse, if education do emphasize on individual, it may conversely impede the effetiveness of education. For example, if every school set courses according to every students' talent, then there will be many courses, in most of which teacher only teach few students, which is a waste of teacher resource. To balance the cost of setting these courses, the school have to increase the xf of every students, which result in only wealth students gain the opportunity to get education, which contradict with the effectiveness and
purpose of education.

However, the solution to the dilema is to take a balance aiming at the maximizing the benefit of the society.And that is the purpose of education in my defination. With that standard, to executive education effectively, we have to take the balance of the needs and interests of individual and the whole. That's why we have some college specifically aiming at impart students with the basic skill to get a job, while comrehansive^zhe university enjoy fame and vigor all over the America.That's why without the compusary courses, students have the choices to choose opional courses accoding to their interest.
In sum, i

【i修改】As the famous saying of Confucius, one of the greatest philosopher of East going, "Students should be taught naturally according to their character and talent", the speaker's assertion seems cogent. Does such education, laying more stress on the development of students, perfectly achieve the goal of education? Without the discussion of objective of education, we cannot gain a hasty conclusion.
What does education aim at? I believe, the education tries to promote the development of society, by passing the current knowledge and value to students, preparing them for the work and life in their future. Maybe someone argues that only when individual ability and interest are fully inspired and developed, will the society gain its better future, that is "the whole society's best rely on individual best ".Is that right?
Answer varies with time. In the past, the beginning of human society and culture, the number of human was much less than that at present. Natural and social resource is adequate according to the population. The development of society, showing the effectiveness of education, relies on mostly on the few people. In that ambience, totally neglecting interpersonal competence, the answer is "yes".
On the contrary, nowadays, the answer is "no": when the number is counted by billion, the resource left for individual is so little to take into account ,individual needs and interests of each students, to plan our education. What's worse, if education do emphasize on individual, it may conversely impede the effectiveness of education. For example, if every school set courses according to every student’s talent, then there will be many courses, in most of which teacher only teach few students, which is a waste of teacher resource. To balance the cost of setting these courses, schools have to increase the tuition of every student, which result in only wealth students gain the opportunity to get education, which contradict with the effectiveness and purpose of education.

However, the solution to the dilemma is to take a balance aiming at the maximizing the benefit of the society. And that is the purpose of education in my definition. With that standard, to executive education effectively, we have to take the balance of the needs and interests of individual and the whole. That's why we have some college specifically aiming at impart students with the basic skill to get a job, while comprehensive universities enjoy fame and vigor all over the America, even the world. That's why without the compulsory courses, students have the choices to choose optional courses according to their interest.
In sum, because of the complexity of education, it is arbitrary to judge the effectiveness of education. In the recent global surroundings, the best choice to increase the effectiveness of education is to take a balance between the student’s own needs and interest and the common need and interest of the society. (479)

段内的论证要加强。学习！
控制时间 和 语言 的平衡。

zxwhy825UID: 2668443

求PP

zxwhy825UID: 2668443

谢谢。。求P