强烈球拍~~！怀疑精神 153~~4天后考啦~

ichebanUID: 2754372

TOPIC: ISSUE153 - "Students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study. They should question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively."

Should we bring skepticism to everything we taught with instead of accepting passively? From my perspective, I agree with the assertion to some extent, however, prior to question what we are told we should develop a foundation of knowledge and have an in-depth thought of ourselves and do our uttermost to seek for the answers.

First and foremost, it is undeniable that skepticism plays an important role in our study, not to mention the significant functions of boosting the development of our daily lives nowadays. Look back on the history, we never fail to be fascinated by the skepticism that preeminent giants held, which created a lot of treasure for our human beings. Copernicus put forward heliocentric theory, which has toppled over the prevailing geocentric theory; relativity theory of Einstein shows the deficiency of the classic mechanics; Galileo, regarded as the "father of modern science", brought with a denial to the theory of velocity of Aristotle, who dominated the authoritative view. From these examples, the significance of skepticism manifest and it is this spirit can our society have a progress on a continual way.

Moreover, students are the hope of the future and the pillars of society, among whom will eventually become scientists, engineers, doctors, lawyers, scholars and even the president. Only accepting what others tell us without questioning is detrimental to our development of future and at last pose a threat to the society for the reason that no one can possess new ideas and opinions, in other words, the society lose the soul of innovation and cease to proceed. A myriad of examples inform us one without critical thinking can not have splendid achievement. At present still exist many unknowns in our lives require us to seek out. Suppose a professor if only handles knowledge that his or her teacher tells him or her, when facing a problem that has no definite and correct answer, he or she may feel confused and with a freezing mind regarding what to do, and unable to walk for longer in his or her profession without original thinking.

However beneficial skepticism might be, too much emphasize on it will obscure the drawbacks it might bring about. There are two major reasons. Firstly, over skepticism might be counterproductive in educating teenagers, sometimes can cultivate an atmosphere of self-righteousness and what is worse, it may be lead to a distrust in others whenever every time, this can conduct to a discord in society. Secondly, before one doubts others, he or she should first develop a foundation of knowledge and have an in-depth study on it, otherwise without thinking after learning a person is likely to become one simply knows to question but actually have not much ability to solve.

In sum, I agree with skepticism will benefit the students and society in a long run; however without critical thinking and over skepticism is both detrimental to education, thus critical thinking should develop in a foundation of solid knowledge.

请有空的高手们帮忙看看逻辑和结构和语言咯~~在此谢过了~~

lingli_xiaoaiUID: 172506

我有点好奇。。为啥我这两天看到的153文章 连TS都是几乎一样的内容。。当然语言不完全一样
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=1133757&highlight=
但是student will becomes。。。。这句话都一样
前面都用亚里斯多德 爱因斯坦 伽利略的例子 虽然在不同的地方。

楼主不要误会。。我想知道这个论据安排顺序，或者要讨论的点有什么参考的凭据么。。我看那个人的第一篇的时候就觉得好像在哪里看过。

ichebanUID: 2754372

2# lingli_xiaoai 惨了~~！这样岂不是很容易判雷同……students 那个是在作文大讲堂上看到的……亚里士多德那些例子是之前就准备好了的……思路有参考一下别人的提纲。但语言都是自己的~~那请问下这篇文章有什么问题吗？还有还有哦~~你的科学杂志分享好棒哦~~

lingli_xiaoaiUID: 172506

2# lingli_xiaoai 惨了~~！这样岂不是很容易判雷同……students 那个是在作文大讲堂上看到的……亚里士多德那些例子是之前就准备好了的……思路有参考一下别人的提纲。但语言都是自己的~~那请问下这篇文章有什么问题 ...
icheban 发表于 2010-8-7 13:06

原来是xdf出的材料。。这就是雷同的来源阿。。。
诚恳建议，这种特简单的思路，千万别写在TS上。。那本书都出了很多年了。。。你这样写 不是往枪口上撞么。
你可以用这样的思路，但是不要用一样的句子，类似的都不要用。
我就在gter这么小的地方，连续两天看到这样的TS，你说rater呢。。不要冒险阿。

这篇文章本身讨论没有什么太大的问题，你现在看看那个人的文章，把你那段TS跟别人一看就是差不多来源的给换了。

科学美国人是本好书。。经常看的话 对你将来到美国也有好处，对笔试阅读也有好处，完了以后，其实本身也满好看的，至少比经济学家好看多了。。慢慢看吧。。

ichebanUID: 2754372

4# lingli_xiaoai 感谢前辈指导~！

-.-UID: 2762228

请问什么是ts啊？

ichebanUID: 2754372

7# -.- topic sentence是也~~

-.-UID: 2762228

7# -.-  topic sentence是也~~
icheban 发表于 2010-8-7 14:12

囧。。想了半天没想到这个上面。。

ts是指文章的还是指段落的呢？

ichebanUID: 2754372

ts是指文章的还是指段落的呢？
-.- 发表于 2010-8-7 17:28

应该是都有的~~还有哦~交流一下吧，用伽利略啊，哥白尼这些老例子会不会不好啊？

-.-UID: 2762228

应该是都有的~~还有哦~交流一下吧，用伽利略啊，哥白尼这些老例子会不会不好啊？
icheban 发表于 2010-8-7 19:38

不知道额。。这个会不会雷同呢。。同观点同例子。。

ichebanUID: 2754372

10# -.- 可是又要改例子吖？我只比较熟悉这仨人啊~哎

UrielTengUID: 2873403

9# icheban


至今不知道伽利略、哥白尼的英文名的含泪飘过~~~

ichebanUID: 2754372

12# UrielTeng 兄弟~甭哭！我想你还有很多时间~到时候就都知道了。我！快赴考场啦~