- 最后登录
- 2011-10-23
- 在线时间
- 17 小时
- 寄托币
- 337
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2009-3-5
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 7
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 258
- UID
- 2611311

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 337
- 注册时间
- 2009-3-5
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 7
|
发表于 2010-8-31 11:09:18
|显示全部楼层
写超时了很多
8.31
Currently, because of the improvement in people's living standard more attention is invested into not only the certain aspect in life such as diet and traffic, but also to ones that can influent the society more profoundly and further, which involves the inevitable but controversial topics including children's education. A year after another, parents seem always confused that what kind of education is the most suitable for younger children like in five to ten. Basically, the traditional concept of education toward younger boys and girls defines science, language and history required rather than the training of music and art. But nowadays, this model is questioned a lot for a new balance between the traditional content and the arts. As far as I concern, arts should be offered to students in a younger age, even though someone may complain about the heavier burden.
First of all, arts, no matter what the time is, have its unique value. To found this world, not only the science tells us what and why, also the arts explain how. That means, even handing the knowledge of physics and chemistry can we image the basic structure to build a skyscraper, the knowledge of art can contribute to some ideas which helps the building own a splendid appearance.
Furthermore, the enterprise today increasingly need a great-looking office building that help themselves promote the image of consumers rather than claim how their office building is strong enough to survive any natural disaster.
Additionally, even having admitted the value of art, I still advocate the education of music and art should be pushed to a younger age like five to ten. Because children become adults in teens, when they will decide which field he or she tend to be major in, it is just few years after ten. If we offered art courses in five or later, children would somehow pick up the feeling or basic knowledge for most sorts of art. That way, they are able to judge which subject is suitable for themselves and it wouldn't happen again that a graduate student is still not sure about his academic future for he has not learnt enough knowledge in both science and art.
Last but not the least, to learn art and music early has its scientific significance. Seldom can a person understand painting or music as special, which means, in fact the process of creating art or enjoying music involves a large mount of brain activity. Researches tell us, the ability in music reflects one's intelligence, which can be easier developed in a younger age. But somehow, when the golden time of learning art has passed, the opportunity to improve that talent mostly disappears. Also, I believe the outstanding intelligence, if we exert earlier arts education, must also be helpful for kids to learn other subjects like language and literature. We can image, what a pity that an art-gifted child pushes all the energy to science and language and finally never becomes someone.
All in all, I support the idea to set an earlier arts education, as what I said above from the practical and scientific aspects. |
|