晶晶的托福作文贴--真诚感谢大家的帮助

robertxjUID: 2645881

报道~9月30日开始交作业~

robertxjUID: 2645881

2008.10.17NA  Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from travelling in their own country than travelling in a foreign country.

Different culture
Different landscape
Different people

Nowadays, there is a conflict that whether people benefit more from travelling in their own country than travelling in a foreign country. Some people believe that we can acquire more knowledge from travelling in our own country, while others think that we can learn a lot of knowledge that we haven’t seen before around us from travelling in a foreign country. As far as I am concerned, there are stronger reasons for travelling in a foreign country because this leads to knowledge that we have never seen in our own country.

Travelling in a foreign country can supply the new culture and custom for us. Every country has a distinct culture and custom according their specific history. We are curious about a different culture and custom, such as that in Africa some women use their head to carry the heavy jars. Those attract us very much.

The beautiful landscape in a different country also is a reason why I like to have a trip in a foreign country. Some countries have a lot of mountains those are very high. Other countries have plenty of big lakes. I like boating in the lake due to the feeling that the cool breeze from the lake. When you stand in a wonderful mountain, you will know how great the nature is.

The most important reason for travelling in a foreign country is that it promotes the international contact. In our own country, we merely have no chance to keep in touch with a foreigner to realize his mind. However, when we travel to a different country, there is no doubt that we can live among the native people, as a result we can learn much from them.

In conclusion, travelling in a foreign country has already helped us learn much from our foreign friends. If we have a trip in foreign country, we may discover even greater knowledge that will improve our life and promote world peace.

顺水飘扬UID: 2715101

2008.10.17NA  Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from travelling in their own country than travelling in a foreign country.

Different culture
Different landscape
Different people

Nowadays, there is a conflict that whether people benefit more from travelling in their own country than travelling in a foreign country. Some people believe that we can acquire more knowledge from travelling in our own country, while others think that we can learn a lot of knowledge that we haven’t seen before around us from travelling in a foreign country. As far as I am concerned, there are stronger reasons for travelling in a foreign country because this leads to knowledge that we have never seen in our own country.

Travelling in a foreign country can supply the new culture and custom for us. Every country has a distinct culture and custom according their specific history. We are curious about a different culture and custom, such as that in Africa some women use their head to carry the heavy jars. Those attract us very much.

The beautiful landscape in a different country also is（is also） a reason why I like to have a trip in a foreign country. Some countries have a lot of mountains those are very high. Other countries have plenty of big lakes. I like boating in the lake due to the feeling that the cool breeze from the lake. When you stand in a wonderful mountain, you will know how great the nature is.

The most important reason for travelling in a foreign country is that it promotes the international contact. In our own country, we merely have no chance to keep in touch with a foreigner to realize his mind. However, when we travel to a different country, there is no doubt that we can live among the native people, as a result we can learn much from them.

In conclusion, travelling in a foreign country has already helped us learn much from our foreign friends. If we have a trip in foreign country, we may discover even greater knowledge that will improve our life and promote world peace.

文章中最好有一些比较，因为题目中就是两者的比较。你写的只有去foreign country的好处，但没有和own country的比较，体现不出来是benefit more.

比如论据的第一段，最后你可以写写：一些own country的习俗你已经很了解了，比如什么什么，所以再去那些地方就没有什么大的意义。  
论据第二段你可以写写：中国的landscape比较单一（具体单不单一我也不知道。。。），我去过的地方都是一样的landscape，然而我又是一个比较喜欢新鲜事物的人，所以去foreign country travel 我可以benefit more。

chxh2020UID: 2587109

个人意见。可复议，不收费。\(^o^)/~

robertxjUID: 2645881

10.2 独立作文

robertxjUID: 2645881

10.5独立作文

suret.leeUID: 2860252

麻烦改一下我的文章，10.9前最后一次了

第五希云捷UID: 2457467

1005修改
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advertising is the most important cause of unhealthy eating habits

Nowadays, when we watch the television, we are easy to see kind（kinds） of advertisings (advertising是不可数，以下同) that we can’t escape from. Majority （这个有点夸张，应该用a large amount of）of advertisings introduce some unhealthy food to us, such as fried chicken, icecream and so on. Some people claim that advertising is the most significant reason for the unhealthy eating habits. In (From) my point of view, the reason why we tend to eat unhealthy food does not concentrate only one aspect, like the advertising of unhealthy food, but on several fields, such as the increasing pace of life and taste of the unhealthy food.（最后一句应鲜明地说是不是最重要的因素！而不是说还有很多的别的因素。别的因素必然有，但是广告是不是最重要的呢？请表明！）

Admittedly, there is no denying that advertising of unhealthy food has an influence （on）our eating habits to some degree. Watching the advertising is the most common way for us to know some new food. The advertising may introduce how delicious the food is, but won’t tell you how unhealthy it is. Those who watch the advertising must desire to have a try to taste this new food. After several meals, even you don’t like to that taste so much at first, you will adapt it which taste particular. So this kind of food will be a choice for your meal.

However, the increasing pace of life also plays an important role for the unhealthy eating habits. Nowadays, majority （of）people are busy studying, working, and have(having) little time to care (for) their eating. It is hard to imagine that those who have working hard a whole day in the company without any rest will have energy and interest to have a dinner for themselves. They must just want to have a fast food and then have a rest.

Last but not least, the taste of the unhealthy food is much better than the traditional food. Usually the unhealthy food has more oil that makes it taste more delicious. The traditional food, however, has less oil, which leads to taste common. So there is no doubt that some people who don’t care the quality of food will choose the food that is more delicious.

To sum up, at least it seems to me that advertising, the increasing pace of life and taste of the unhealthy food are all closely related to the unhealthy eating habits.
论证的结构不错
有些固定搭配有问题，词语的时态不对
然后感觉文章的段落是头重脚轻，越来越短
后面两段主要的不够长，论证地不充分

robertxjUID: 2645881

Nowadays, there is a conflict that whether teacher could express their social or political views in the classroom. Some people think that the schools have the responsibility to establish the students’ political opinions, while other people believe that the students’ point should be decided by themselves, and shouldn’t be affected by teachers. In my opinion, talking about the individual view of the teachers in the class do harm for the students to some degree.

The most important reason is that the teacher’s opinion about the politic and society will impact the students’ view, which should be decided by themselves without any influence by others. That is because the teachers are respected by their students who will believe anything that the teachers say whether it is right or wrong. Meanwhile, majority of the students have little knowledge of the politic and society. They are just like a white paper that will show whatever you have painted on it. So students will believe whatever the teacher have told them.

What’s more talking about the social and political opinion will occupy the time for teaching. Every course only has limited time every semester. There is no denying that the teachers should tell the academic knowledge to the students first. If they spend time on talking about others, they maybe have to decrease the time for teaching the academic knowledge. If so, the students won’t acquire the knowledge which they should have. That will do harm for the students.

Of course, there are some exceptional situations that talking about the social and political opinion in the class is helpful for the students. For example, in the political course, teacher can express his own view as a reference for the students. And they can discuss the topic together, that will make students know variety of political views, even have a coincidence with their teacher. Indeed, the teachers should not force their students to agree with them.

In general, for teachers, it is not a good idea to talk about the social and political opinion with their students.

robertxjUID: 2645881

Do you agree or disagree, students will not use printed books anymore

各有各的优点
Convenient
Healthy

节约用纸

With the development of the high technology, some new inventions come to our life, such as the e-reader which can replace the traditional book. According to the advantage of the e-readers, some people claim that we should use them to take place of the printed books completely. However, in my opinion, both of them have respective merits. None of them can replace the other one.

Initially, traditional books are more convenient than the e-readers. As you know, due to the high technique, when we use the e-reader, we must bring the battles with us and look for the electricity. Without them, we can’t use the e-reader anymore. On the contrast, traditional books are portable. For example, when we are going to begin a long journey, we just need to put the book in our bag. Then whenever we want to read the book, we can take them out of bag and enjoy it immediately without any confinement.

What’s more, traditional books are more health than e-books. Every electrical product has the problem of radiation which do harm to our eyes. In contrast, the traditional books haven’t such problem. If we have a good habit of reading book, we can read for a long time without any feeling of eyes’ tire. So these are the two aspects that traditional books can outweigh the e-readers.

On the other hand, e-readers don’t need paper to produce the book. Paper is made with wood which is very precious to us. Without them, we can’t breathe the fresh air, and the earth will be warmer. Since the wood is important for us, there is no denying that we must concern the waste of the wood. Every year, a large number of trees are cut to produce paper. If we use the e-reader to replace the traditional book, we can survive plenty of trees.

Summarizing the points above, due to the merits of both e-books and traditional books, we should properly take advantage of them both. We can choose between them, according to the different situations

robertxjUID: 2645881

12.2

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement？Being creative, rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution to a problem.

Needless to say, either being creative or planning carefully is better to solve problem, since they do play an important role for the solution. However, is it necessary to pick up the more significant one between them? Definitely I believe there is little value to do so, due to no appropriate method or specific meaning.

Initially, being creative as you face the difficulty is vital to people, considering that creative method always can solve the problem easily and quickly. Not only will we replace the complex and old method with convenient and new method, but also we can get the inspiration from the new idea. For instance, when I was in primary school, it was difficult for me to recite the English words. Occasionally, I find out that I can remember the spelling of word through their pronunciation, since certain word always has specific sound. This method made me have a good score in the following test. With the inspiration of this method, when I learned the French, I still apply the method which also works well.

Secondly, there is no denying that planning carefully are also important for solve the problem successfully. Those who organize the task well always can solve the problem at the end, since they can solve the problem step by step and finally complete the mission. Take myself as an example. Last year, our teacher assigned a task to us to develop a blog system, which we had never done before. However, we made the design carefully and distributed different task to different people. At last, everyone completed their work, thus our system was done.

Furthermore, there is no meaning to evaluate which option is better, being creative or planning carefully. Firstly, different person have different opinion and reasons, just like different preference in eating, where doesn't exist an unconditional criterion. On the other hand, even we find the better between them, it has no practical effects. Such solution can't do a favor to become more creative or plan more carefully. Then why should we do that?

robertxjUID: 2645881

12。3
Do you agree with the following statement? Children should only study or play and don’t have to do household chores.

What if a child just studies and plays everyday and throw his clothes to his mother who can wash them for him? Even though he can get a high score in the test, absolutely we won’t like this kind of children. This practical case does make a statement, which is also my opinion, that children should help their parents do the housework.

Firstly, through the housework, children can understand their parents’ hardship and love them much more. As you know, there is plenty of housework in a family, such as washing the clothes, cleaning the floor and so on. And all of them need a lot of energy and time. Without the experience by themselves, children won’t know how difficult they are. Take myself as an example. When I was in primary school, I never washed my clothes since I thought they were easy task. As a result, I always don’t care about my clothes and made them dirty everyday. However, after I washed my shoes one time, I found that it was really difficult to clean them. After that, I take more care about my clothes and shoes and knew my parents’ hardship.

Second, doing housework benefits children to improve their practical ability, considering that they can learn how to clean the glass and how to order the room. Further more, just as an old saying, people who can’t make himself clean won’t make career successful. Take my teacher Mr. Zhang as an example. He likes to make the room clean and tidy. Through the housework, he has trained a pair of agile hands which make the digital signal panel easily.

Third, form another respective, doing household chores should not outweigh studying, since the main responsibility for children is to gain the knowledge and process the society in the future. If children only do the housework, they won’t play an important role for the society.
Summarizing the points above, children should balance between housework and study, only by then will they have a wonderful and colorful life.

WoYaoChiJiTuiUID: 2850295

12月3日 独立作文 已改完 请查收

robertxjUID: 2645881

12.4 独立

robertxjUID: 2645881

12.4 综合
The reading suggests that we should replace the intermal-combustion enjine with the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine which have several advantages over the former engine. however, the sperker  rejects such conclusion due to the following reasons.

First, the reading passage asserts that the resources for the fuel-cell engines are easily available. However, the speaker maintains that it is not easy to get the resource for the hydrogen which can't be directly used and must be pure liquid. To get such pure liquid, we need some specific condition, such as very low temperate which asks for high technology. Therefore, the resourse is not easy available.

Moreover, the reading passage claims that the hydrogen-based cells can sovle the pollution problems. However, the speaker poionts out that since we need to purify the resource for the new engine, we must burn the coal or oil to get the heat, which generates large amout of carbon diocide to pollute the enviroment. Hence, we can't conclude that hydrogen-based cells is better than the old engine for the enviroment.

Finally, the reading passage alleges that since the fuel-cell powered car requires half the fuel energy that the intermal-combustion powered car does, people will save more money. However, the speaker refutes such point by stating that the price of the new fuel is much higher, since the new technique is complex, which must take chemical action and use a lot of electricity. In a word, the total price for the new car to go a certain distance is higher than the old one.