作文贴~~~IBT写作特训小组作业~~欢迎拍砖

icecontrolUID: 2782559

2010年11月11日 周四：
" \, B0 i2 A4 _7 M* L独立：

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Being creative, rather than planning carefully, will come up with best solution to a problem?

The statement seems to neglect the importance of the planning. In its opinion, even without considering the pros and cons and planning carefully in advance, just being creative would also tackle a puzzle easily. Therefore, I should oppose it with no doubt. In my opinion, actually both of the aspects are the key points in solving a problem so that we can’t ignore either side.
On the one hand, creativity, whose importance can’t be exaggerated, usually brings a novel idea, and helps us find the effective solution, which is really beyond our expectation and usually results in great surprise. A case in point is the design of Eiffel Tower, which was thought to be absolutely impossible at that time, since it was so high and no such architecture had been designed before, even some mathematical professor predicted that it would collapse before it was completed. And there wasn’t any technology that could be referred to, what’s more, the structure as well as other lots of things was the tough problem that should be solved. However, Eiffel, the designer, creatively applied the latticework as the structure and combined the millions of the iron parts by rivets, which could cope with the difficulties easily. In the end, the tower was completed successfully, which is a miracle in the world. Now it is a symbol of the France and brings about lots of benefit by attracting large numbers of the tourists. Actually, it is the creativity that leads to the high technology and the masterpieces. It can be safe to say without creativity, there wouldn’t have so many inventions and miracles and our lives standard wouldn’t have been improved so dramatically.
On the other hand, however, only by the creativity without planning carefully, we can’t get the problem settled properly and effectively either. Once again is the case of Eiffel Tower. If the designer hadn’t planned what to do first and what to second with a variety of the creativities, the tower wouldn’t be completely successfully. Another case is about preparing the examination. We should make a schedule and check what should be done right now and what then, by which we can be more effective. If not, we may be in a mess and just forget something time and again.
To draw a conclusion, both being creative and planning carefully are essential to solve a problem successfully and effectively. In fact, they are interdependent and if we plan without being creative, it is meaningless and we would fall behind and even be washed out, while if without planning carefully, being creative is no more than a ship without a steering in the sea. Therefore, only when we combine the two aspects, can we make a good work.

gaarUID: 2680566

11.11改好了 11.11icecontrol.doc (31.5 KB, 下载次数: 6)

2010-11-12 09:42:54 上传

下载次数: 6

icecontrolUID: 2782559

独立：

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A job with more vacation time is better than a job with high salary but less vacation time.

In terms of job, some people prefer one with more vacation but comparatively low salary while others incline to the opposite one - with less vacation time but higher salary. However, if I am asked which one is better, I am convinced that either has its own advantages and disadvantage and we can’t claim simply which one is better, for it depends on the job-hunter’s expectation and demand.

To begin with, as far as the young people are concerned, such as the graduates, it may be better for them to take a job with higher salary but less vacation time. Because they are young, full of enthusiasm and energy and can engage themselves in all kinds of the tasks in job for a long time without a vacation or with few vacation. In addition, over recent decades the cost of living has been undergoing a rapid increase, the young people should spare no efforts to earn more money and accumulate wealth as soon as possible before it is too late, so that they can afford such as the expensive house, education for their future child and everything related and lead a decent life as well. Moreover, by spending more time on the work, they can gain more experience that is extremely essential for the young people especially the graduates and would have more opportunities to promote and succeed. Therefore, it is a wise decision for the young people to take such job.

But when it comes to the middle-age people or the old people who will retire soon, it should be quite another different case. Since they are not so vigorous and need more time to take a rest and recovery, also it may be better for them to spend more time with their families and pay more attention to their child rather than make the work occupy most of their time. Furthermore, they have some accumulations of money and experience over the past few years for working and don’t need to worry about them as much as the young people to some extent. All of these enable them to take a leisure-style job and at this stage, what they really need is to enjoy the life more, for example having the vacation with their family by the sea. In this sense, it is more reasonable that they choose a job with more vacation time.

Consequently, it can draw a conclusion that whether it is better to have a job with more vacation time or a one with higher salary but less vacation time, it is not definite and depends on different people with different needs. Only when the job meets our requirement can it be a better job.



综合： TPO13

The lecturer obviously disagrees with the points stated in the passage and point out that the benefits of the commercial market of fossil outweigh the disadvantage.

Firstly, instead of less exposure, if the fossils are in commercial market, it will result in more exposure to the public because the public organization like the school and museum can retain it and buy it for the public show.

Secondly, the lecturer argues that the scientists wouldn’t miss out any crucial discoveries about the fossils. Because before the fossils are sold to the commercial collector, they are examined and identified by the scientists carefully.

Furthermore, the lecture claims that if there is any damage caused by the commercial fossil collector, it is because the fossil is still undiscovered. And it is better to have the fossil discovered with unknown the exact location and other small details than the fossil completely undiscovered. Therefore, in this sense the damage can be outweighed by the discovery of the fossil.

windslpUID: 2903140

独立晚点来批,!~~T T。
刚回到家额T T。

cckkll1994UID: 2952719

11.18综合

The lecturer obviously disagrees with the points stated in the passage and point(s) out that the benefits of the commercial market of fossil outweigh the disadvantage.

      Firstly, instead of less exposure, if the fossils are in commercial market（后置的话结构会更匀称）, it will result in more exposure to the public because the public organization like the school and museum can retain it and buy it for the public show.
      Secondly, the lecturer argues that the scientists wouldn’t miss out any crucial discoveries about the fossils. Because before the fossils are sold to the commercial collector, they are examined and identified by the scientists carefully（before they are sold out)."      
       Furthermore, the lecture claims that if there is any damage caused by the commercial fossil collector(s), it is because the fossil is still undiscovered. And it is better to have the fossil discovered with unknown the exact location and other small details than the fossil completely undiscovered. Therefore, in this sense the damage can be outweighed by the discovery of the fossil.


文章写得很不错，我几乎找不出硬伤来
不过有一点要注意一下，综合写作既要写出听力的观点还要写出阅读的观点啊
而我在文章中很难发现阅读中作者观点的影子......（怪不得我说你的文章怎么这么短）