TPO阅读求解

huaimingyunUID: 2943676

这道阅读题目我有点想不明白，请各位大侠多多指教：
Freud describes people as steam engines in order to make the point that people
 ADeliberately build up their aggression to make themselves stronger
 BUsually release aggression in explosive ways
 CMust vent their aggression to prevent it from building up
 DTypically lose their aggression if they do not express it
参考段落：
The Psychodynamic Approach. Theorists adopting the psychodynamic approach hold that inner conflicts are crucial for understanding human behavior, including aggression. Sigmund Freud, for example, believed that aggressive impulses are inevitable reactions to the frustrations of daily life. Children normally desire to vent aggressive impulses on other people, including their parents, because even the most attentive parents cannot gratify all of their demands immediately. ■Yet children, also fearing their parents' punishment and the loss of parental love, come to repress most aggressive impulses. ■The Freudian perspective, in a sense: sees us as "steam engines." ■By holding in rather than venting "steam," we set the stage for future explosions. ■Pent-up aggressive impulses demand outlets. They may be expressed toward parents in indirect ways such as destroying furniture, or they may be expressed toward strangers later in life.
答案是C，我选的是B，逻辑上理解不了，感觉考试时自己还是会选择B 呢

lihan96163UID: 2810524

你可以这么想： B没有说全 release aggression in explosive ways文章是包含的  但是"steam engines."这个例子是统领下文的  下文的意思是先hold in 再释放，注意pent up这个词 被压制 ，就暗含了一定要释放来防止进一步积累的意思吧？  我做这个提示就直接类比的蒸汽机的原理，嘻嘻 用了点专业知识去辅助分析


希望可以帮到你

huaimingyunUID: 2943676

谢谢你的解答，很有帮助，我仔细读了下确实有C的感觉了，不过就怕考试时头晕，类似的题目还是做错。 2# lihan96163

huaimingyunUID: 2943676

如果可以，能帮我看下这道题吗？我也没有明白呢
Which of the following statements about the availability of water in the Mayan homeland is supported by paragraph 3?
 AThe construction of wells was an uncommon practice in both the north and the south because it was too difficult to dig through the karst.
 BIn most areas in the north and the south, rainwater was absorbed directly into the porous karst.
 CThe water table was an important resource for agriculture in both the north and the south of the Yucatan Peninsula.
 DThe lack of surface water in both the north and the south was probably due to the fact that most of it was quickly used up for agricultural purposes.
参考段落：
Although southern Maya areas received more rainfall than northern areas, problems of water were paradoxically more severe in the wet south. While that made things hard for ancient Maya living in the south, it has also made things hard for modern archaeologists who have difficulty understanding why ancient droughts caused bigger problems in the wet south than in the dry north. The likely explanation is the an area of underground freshwater underlies the Yucatan Peninsula, but surface elevation increases from north to south, so that as one moves south the land surface lies increasingly higher above the water table. In the northern peninsula the elevation is sufficiently low that the ancient Maya were able to reach the water table at deep sinkholes, the Maya would have been able to get down to the water table by digging wells up to 75 feet (22 meters) deep. But much of the south lies too high above the water table for cenotes or well to karst, a porous sponge-like limestone terrain where rain straight into the ground and where little or no surface water remains available.
题目答案是B，我选的是C，有没有遇到同样问题的同学呀？求分析
另外，你也在准备吗？什么时候考呀？ 1# huaimingyun

lihan96163UID: 2810524

4# huaimingyun 做这道题时我是这么分析的
But much of the south lies too high above the water table for cenotes or well to karst, a porous sponge-like limestone terrain where rain straight into the ground and where little or no surface water remains available.

这句话是对比的作用  与它形成对比的是对比的是in the south， the land surface lies increasingly higher above the water table. 说的是对这样对比的进一步阐释，也就是造成了or cenotes or well to karst的难易程度，你没有选Ｂ的原因一定是只看到在south 提到了karst？而文中应用同一标准对两个地方进行对比，其实是同一事物的不同方面,一个是不容易到达karst，另一个就肯定是容易到达了karst了。因为是同一事物，所以省略未再提及。

也可用排除法看，这道题很好用。C中的mportant resource for agriculture 这段中根本没有提及过，即使跨段有提，因为题目有段落限制也不要自己主观加上。
我一般是这么用排除法的：对于文章根本没有提及的概念，除非有很大把握，一般是不会选的。因为托福的阅读考的是翻译，不用深入理解，自己想反而出错，这点认识很重要！
希望可以帮到你

话说我周六就要考啦！！就是明天！！二战要100+！
来寄托看看题 也自己分析下思路！ ^_^   
加油加油，你也加油！！

huaimingyunUID: 2943676

恩，是的，我有时候就觉得imply,infer之类的应该就是再深入点，看来是没有必要啊。谢谢你的解释，加油哈，我觉得你没问题的，我比你晚两周，考完给我讲点经验哈。好运啦 5# lihan96163

lihan96163UID: 2810524

6# huaimingyun ^_^  谢谢 一起加油  好运！