加入独立写作小组~珊的作文贴

fengyanhongUID: 2941762

新来的~加我一个
从明天起，做个幸福的人~交作业交作业交作业...
大家狠批啊，感谢！
前进前进前进——>1.30

fengyanhongUID: 2941762

2010.11.30
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Being creative, rather than planning carefully, will come up with best solution to a problem?
改过一遍拼写之后
Innovation, as many people think, contributes a lot to the solution in varied unknown fields. Meanwhile well-arranged plans also have been used in many big companies for problem solving. In my point of view, discussing which means is the best one that generates perfect solutions is of little practical value. It is meaningful to combine these two methods, which have both advantages and disadvantages when applying solitarily, to make better solutions.

Creativeness is the most important, if not the only, key to the world of unknown, though it is impossible to predict when the key will come into being. In the field of science, countless breakthroughs were, are, and will be made through innovated ideas, for being creative will enlarge the realm within which people can search for the possible answers. However, no one can predict when and who will come up with the creative ideas. In a world where the efficiency is highly emphasized, no one would expect to rely on being creative to solve problems in time. What is worse, problems today are always integrated and highly intertwined with each other, and hardly be solved by the thought of individual alone. Thus, no creative idea can assure to solve every problem that contributes to an integrated one.

Well-arranged plans, on the other hand, is possible to solve problems related to the fields people have already possess a lot of experience, and it may come up with the solutions, if were not the perfect ones, but the acceptable ones within a period of set time. Take software developing enterprise as an example, everyday they confront with varied demands of their customers. The demands are unique in appearance while have common in reality. So that they sum up the experience they get from each case, break the problems into smaller parts, and at last generate plan models to guide them solving each sub-problem step by step. Plans keep them efficient and prevent them from making mistakes. However, the experience upon which one can make their plan may go out of date or may confine people to a narrow familiar area, so it is likely to mislead people on the long run.

As a conclusion, being creative may help you overcome one specific difficulty, and careful plan will help your link the group of solved and unsolved problem together to eventually assure you an acceptable solution. When binding these two methods together, that is to say having a carefully plan and being creative while you carrying on the plan, your solution will be a better one.

fengyanhongUID: 2941762

2010.12.2
Should an effective leader make others have been part of decision making?
终于没有超时~~篇幅短了点 很珍视大家的建议
Leader is the most significant person in a group, for he is the one making the crucial decision. However, all the party members as a part of the group also play an important role in achieving the ultimate aim. Thus, their opinions should be included in decision making process, though admittedly the leader is the only one who is able to make the final decision.

Group members' ideas are creative and varied. When combining all their opinions together, leaders could come up with a comprehensive decision. This year I enjoy the popular TV series 24 hours, season eight. It is fascinating, for the unexpected problems have always been solved immediately by the efforts of the whole CTU members. The leader Hasting made several bad decisions, because he refused to listen to his assistant Chole's advices. Always, he follows his rule of solving problem, while in the crucial moment, things were out of control. If one person should be responsible for all the good as well as the bad outcome of his decision, he may be afraid to make decision that is of great risk. Yet, his fellows may give him the better ideas to help him review the whole situation without fearing the undesirable outcome.  

However, though group member's suggestions are of value to some extent, the leader should be decisive enough to make the final plan himself. For one thing, part of the members’ ideas may be biased, because they take too much their own interests into consideration. The leader should be well aware of that. For another, it is the leader that gets hold of the whole situation and understands which is the most important and crucial point of the decision. So the leaders, though could rely on their fellows to some degree, should balance the advantages and disadvantages in his own clear mind.

As a conclusion, I contend that an effective leader should take into account of his fellows' opinions in decision making, whereas the final decision should be draw out by himself. Thus, a comprehensive and unbiased resolution will be made.

fengyanhongUID: 2941762

12.4作业
Some people think children should study and play, other people think children should help with household chores.
写得好费劲啊这次，简直是挤牙膏 期待建议
The phase of being a child is important in one's life, because the experience one get during this period will have a significant effect on the rest time of life. Whether a child should spend more time on studying and playing, or help with the family has caught people's attention. Admittedly, a person sooner or later should learn to do the housework and shoulder the family burden, in the high time of the enlightening phase, kids should study and play.

When considering the study, young people tend to be quicker than the elders to learn. Besides, the elders will have huge pressure when studying with the energetic young men. As researches showed that people's ability to quickly and accurately remember things will gradually lose when ageing. What is more, one's willing to accept new concept is varied according to age. In a word, to avoid of being ignorant and regretting for the past when you are old, one should make good use of the time and grab the opportunity to study when he was a child.

When it comes to the play, lots of people would like to compare the whole life of a man to a play. Likewise, lots of social rules and standard norms are hided in the simple games the children played, so it is no wonder that playing is the best way for a child to develop both his ability and personality to get prepared when he grow up. Firstly, taking poker game for example, kids’ basic abilities are improved during this game. When a child loses the game for the first time, I am fully convinced that he can not take the failure easily, but I bet that he would learn to afford the defeat several times later. We are social animal, so it is important to learn how to communicate and get along with others, and that is what the games teach a youngster imperceptibly. Secondly, a happy childhood will help a child form lovely personality. I doubt any child doesn’t like playing the game. The pure enjoyment children get from the game symbolizes the happy childhood.

Children can help with housework if they like to, but it is not a necessity, especially for children in financially comfortable families. Though children can develop the sense of responsibility in this way, shouldering too much responsibility in an early age will make them premature.  

As a conclusion, children should play and study rather than help with family chores. For one thing, studying and playing equip children with more knowledge; improve their abilities; shape their personalities. All these are vital for children to adapt to the uncertain future. For another, help with the housework is not a necessity in this high period.

ilovevickyUID: 2937658

今天考试，所以考完才来帮你改。。。
Leader is the most significant person in a group, for he is the one making the crucial decision. However, all the party members as a part of the group also play an important role in achieving the ultimate aim. Thus, their opinions should be included in decision making process, though admittedly the leader is the only one who is able to make the final decision.# q. p1 A7 w- u4 U

# o  ^$ @1 z& R" @0 SGroup members' ideas are creative and varied. When combining all their opinions together, leaders could come up with a comprehensive decision. This year I enjoy the popular TV series 24 hours, season eight. It is fascinating, for the unexpected problems have always been solved immediately by the efforts of the whole CTU members. The leader Hasting made several bad decisions, because he refused to listen to his assistant Chole's advices. Always, he follows his rule of solving problem, while in the crucial moment, things were out of control. If one person should be responsible for all the good as well as the bad outcome of his decision, he may be afraid to make decision that is of great risk. Yet, his fellows may give him the better ideas to help him review the whole situation without fearing the undesirable outcome.  语言灰常好，羡慕啊~~~如果写好例子再总结一下就更好了。
% ?1 F" ^; U7 I  ?' b0 F7 Y4 Z; [4 r( K' I
However, though group member's suggestions are of value to some extent, the leader should be decisive enough to make the final plan himself. For one thing, part of the members’ ideas may be biased, because they take too much their own interests into consideration. The leader should be well aware of that. For another, it is the leader that gets hold of the whole situation and understands which is the most important and crucial point of the decision. So the leaders, though could rely on their fellows to some degree, should balance the advantages and disadvantages in his own clear mind.4 我知L( W+ c8 I. `0 k9 c6 f5 N


我知道你的意思是让组员参与进来，但是最后拍板的仍然是领导。感觉你是中立的观点。就是说你把decision making 分割成两个：过程和结论。组员只是参加过程，而领导下结论。有点思辨的感觉哎。可是我个人觉得你还可以想想别的写法，你说呢？

As a conclusion, I contend that an effective leader should take into account of his fellows' opinions in decision making, whereas the final decision should be draw out by himself. Thus, a comprehensive and unbiased resolution will be made. 哦就这样结尾了？我还意犹未尽的说。我个人觉得你的角度还可以再多元化一点。感觉中间两段不够给力。我个人觉得你的语言么有问题，但是你的结构需要好好构思

yhailunUID: 2603669

哈哈 我来晚了~~
For 2010.11.30
Innovation, as many people think, contributes a lot to the solution in varied unknown fields. Meanwhile well-arranged plans also have been used in many big companies (有点怪，company应该不是主打吧？这里应该讲的泛一点。且如果你是想结合二者，则说company单采用well-arranged plans不妥)[有点怪，company应该不是主打吧？这里应该讲的泛一点。且如果你是想结合二者，则说company单采用well-arranged plans不妥]for problem solving. In my point of view, discussing which means is the best(better) one that generates perfect solutions is of little practical value. It is meaningful to combine these two methods, which have both advantages and disadvantages when applying solitarily(applied singly, solitarily倾向于描述人的孤独状态), to make better solutions.' _0 K6 i9 \% {3 T9 T! i6 b7 z, P0 w5 ?, k5 m' q; iCreativeness(creativity) is the most important, if not the only, key to the world of unknown, though it is impossible to predict when the key will come into being. In the field of science, countless breakthroughs were, are, and will be made through innovated(innovative) ideas, for being creative will enlarge the realm within which people can search for the possible answers. However, no one can predict when and who will come up with the creative ideas. In a world where the efficiency is highly emphasized, no one would expect to rely on being creative to solve problems in time. What is worse, problems today are always integrated and highly intertwined with each other, and hardly be solved by the thought of (an) individual alone. Thus, no creative idea can assure to solve every problem that contributes to an integrated one.( R3 X9 A8 Y- D& ]( O9 R" p6 y' ^  g2 j0 f( F. hWell-arranged plans, on the other hand, is possible to solve problems related to the fields people have already possess a lot of experience, and it may come up with the solutions, if were not the perfect ones, but the acceptable ones within a period of set time.(这句我不是很懂。如果有点强调or转折在里面，且作为主旨句，下文是否该plans不perfect但acceptable？)[这句我不是很懂。如果有点强调or转折在里面，且作为主旨句，下文是否该plans不perfect但acceptable？] Take software developing enterprise as an example, everyday they confront with varied demands of their customers. The demands are unique in appearance while have common in reality. So that they sum up the experience they get from each case,break the problems into smaller parts, and at last generate plan models to guide them solving each sub-problem step by step.(你的例子讲人家怎么plan的，却偏离了对plans优点的突出。) [你的例子讲人家怎么plan的，却偏离了对plans优点的突出。]Plans keep them efficient and prevent them from making mistakes. However, the experience (你成功的把plan酱油成了experience。。。但其实差蛮远的。只看开头结尾，显得不和谐吧……？)[你成功的把plan酱油成了experience。。。但其实差蛮远的。只看开头结尾，显得不和谐吧……？]upon which one can make their plan may go out of date or may confine people to a narrow familiar area, so it is likely to mislead people on the long run.( r4 X1 a( O5 a0 r6 E( C; D; A6 i6 l% a. `8 g7 }8 R! U, sAs a conclusion, being creative may help you overcome one specific difficulty, and careful plan will help your(you) link the group of solved and unsolved problem together(逻辑有点跳) [逻辑有点跳]to eventually assure you an acceptable solution. When binding these two methods together, that is to say having a carefully plan and being creative while you carrying on the plan, your solution will be a better one.(这样你的重头戏只有两段咯？要是字数不过我觉得这段bind可以扩成中间段，论证如何通过bind达到极致啥的。)
xmc811(棂无影)同学好像语法上的小问题看的很细心啊，我就基于他的改啦~~
语法句法上没有感觉重复的，这样很好。不过你喜欢用很长的句子，我建议尤其是在分论点的时候要慎重。分论点给的简洁有力点好。文风总体而言比较朴实，而且没有限于模板化噢，很好啦！
逻辑上感觉连接的有一点点，两段都有这种感觉，不知道是不是我的问题……
+U~

yhailunUID: 2603669

Leader is the most significant person in a group, for he is the one making the crucial decision. However, all the party members as a part of the group also play an important role in achieving the ultimate aim. Thus, their opinions should be included in decision making process, though admittedly the leader is the only one who is able to make the final decision.
Group members' ideas are creative and varied. When combining all their opinions together, leaders could come up with a comprehensive decision.[这里的comprehensive decision和下文group帮助leader不fearing不大一致。](这里的comprehensive decision和下文group帮助leader不fearing不大一致。) This year I enjoy the popular TV series 24 hours, season eight. It is fascinating, for the unexpected problems have always been solved immediately by the efforts of the whole CTU members. The leader Hasting made several bad decisions, because he refused to listen to his assistant Chole's advice. Always, he follows(时态) his rule of solving problem(s), while in the crucial moment, things were out of control. If one person should be responsible for all the good as well as the bad outcome of his decision, he may be afraid to make decision that is of great risk.[像这样的，应该仅用于支撑例子，于主旨无益，可花少点笔墨。](像这样的，应该仅用于支撑例子，于主旨无益，可花少点笔墨。) Yet, his fellows may give him the(删去) better ideas to help him review the whole situation without fearing the undesirable outcome. [似乎太多篇幅讲这个例子了。尽管最后Yet说了group的功效，但如果把你的观点独立于example效果会更好一点~] (似乎太多篇幅讲这个例子了。尽管最后Yet说了group的功效，但如果把你的观点独立于example效果会更好一点~)9 X: q- X- G4 B. z5 _" g8 a* L% O/ O: r& C& Z1 C# QHowever, though group member's suggestions are of value to some extent, the leader should be decisive enough to make the final plan himself. For one thing, part of the members’ ideas may be biased, because they take too much their own interests into consideration. The leader should be well aware of that. For another, it is the leader that gets hold of the whole situation and understands which is the most important and crucial point of the decision. So the leaders, though could rely on their fellows to some degree, should balance the advantages and disadvantages in his own clear mind.
As a conclusion[这里又把正反方都说了下，感觉像是平衡观点的用法。我觉得你是有自己的逻辑，但可考虑最后重点突出你的选择。], I contend that an effective leader should take into account of his fellows' opinions in decision making, whereas the final decision should be draw out by himself. Thus, a comprehensive and unbiased resolution will be made.(这里又把正反方都说了下，感觉像是平衡观点的用法。我觉得你是有自己的逻辑，但可考虑最后重点突出你的选择。)

似乎分论点不大明晰，因为你是支持正方观点，但只写了一段，反方观点也写的多些。两篇主体段都只有两段，可以考虑扩充成3段。
还有一个问题，也可能不是很重要，你的两篇文章逻辑上跳的比较多，会讲着讲着偏离段首中心句。因为好像国外人的语言上主旨放在段首的比较多，所以最好下文能围绕于此。
文风上，撇开跳跃性角度，每句话还是很有内容的，不错啊~可以考虑换一些表达方式如反问，强调、排比句等，会显得花哨些，呵呵~
就这个题，可以用（正，正，反）的写法：
Group很creative；论述+例子
Group很diversity；论述+例子
However，Leader在听取的同时也要有自己的主见。
例子重点突出一些，可以有意识的分类收集下你喜欢的小例子。

S酱UID: 2883188

Some people think children should study and play, other people think children should help with household chores.

The phase of being a child is important in one's life, because the experience one get（gets） during this period will have a significant effect on the rest time of life. Whether a child should spend more time on(in or on study and play) studying and playing, or help(helping) with the family has caught people's attention. Admittedly, a person sooner or later should learn to do the housework and shoulder the family burden, in the high time of the enlightening phase, kids should study and play.

When considering the study, young people tend to be quicker than the elders to learn(表达别扭). Besides, the elders will have huge pressure when studying with the energetic young men（觉得不是很严密，因为elder的定义不明晰，多少岁是young多少岁是old？）. As researches showed that people's ability to quickly and accurately remember things will gradually lose when ageing（觉得说reduce比较好）. What is more, one's willing to accept new concept is varied according to age. In a word, to avoid of being ignorant and regretting for the past when you are old, one should make good use of the time and grab the opportunity to study when he was a child. （这里可以举例子或者详细说，现在泛泛谈young和old没有什么说服力）

When it comes to the play, lots of people would like to compare the whole life of a man to a play（这句不懂）. Likewise, lots of social rules and standard norms are hided in the simple games the children played, so it is no wonder that playing is the best way for a child to develop both his ability and personality to get prepared when he grow up. Firstly, taking poker game for example, kids’ basic abilities are improved during this game. When a child loses the game for the first time, I am fully convinced that he can not take the failure easily, but I bet that he would learn to afford the defeat several times later. We are social animal, so it is important to learn how to communicate and get along with others, and that is what the games teach a youngster imperceptibly. Secondly, a happy childhood will help a child form lovely personality. I doubt any child doesn’t like playing the game. The pure enjoyment children get from the game symbolizes the happy childhood.（这段的例子很好，很细节比较有说服力，但是语言还需要注意，很多地方不是很地道）$ n7 E( @- ~& Y4 m6 v8 ?

Children can help with housework if they like to, but it is not a necessity, especially for children in financially comfortable families. Though children can develop the sense of responsibility in this way, shouldering too much responsibility in an early age will make them premature.  （让步段太短了）

As a conclusion, children should play and study rather than help（helping） with family chores. For one thing, studying and playing equip children with more knowledge;（逗号） improve their abilities;（这个符号不能这么用－ －逗号＋and） shape（shaping） their personalities. All these are vital for children to adapt to the uncertain future. For another, help with the housework is not a necessity in this high period.（觉得这段和上段结合结合好了，最后一段一句话都行不用说这么多）

因为4号作文居然只有你自己写了，于是没办法分组呢～路过帮顶了
你的用语和句子需要加强，目前chinglish有点严重，还有动词的使用，貌似是语法上面的问题

hycqyUID: 2819662

加油啊

fengyanhongUID: 2941762

感谢楼上所有朋友啊 路过没事的也多给评评 感谢大家！
12.7 12.8 Is it easier to be successful in the past than it is today
听取上一篇S酱指点，结尾很短，嘿嘿,也是时间不够用了，最后大家都留几分钟做检查啊？
修改过一次之后。
As a human being in contemporary era, I optimistically convinced that it is easier to be successful now than the past.Admittedly, it is also true that our predecessors had already solved a great deal of problems and left the relatively more difficult ones to us, so some people may argue it shouldn't be easier to success now. However, after having a reasonable analysis of their concerns, I still believed that we are more close to the ultimate truth than ever before.

Some people may think that the problems left by our ancestors are those difficult ones, so they can't be solved easily. However, I want to highlight that our ancestor not only left problems but also had solved lots of them. More importantly, by learning how they solve the problem, we gain the methodology of dealing with the difficulty. Newton once said that if I had seen further it was by standing on the shoulders of the Giants. Now, we are standing one the shoulders of numerous Giants, so it makes no sense that the possibility of success should decrease.

Some people may further argue that one should have a firm grasp of much more different branches of knowledge than ever before  to be successful now; accordingly the path to the peak is more arduous. Nevertheless, those people overlook the reality that it is through the combination of various branches of knowledge that we have created much more fields to research. That is to say, more possibilities are created. Furthermore, merely through the combination of newly formed fields, can one make a difference to the world. The success of Facebook is the best illustration to this point, for it combines the thriving Internet technology with the traditional study of social intercourse.

In addition, we are now equipped with efficient tools to facilitate our success unprecedentedly. With the help of computers, we can calculate more quickly; with the internet, communication becomes more convenient; with the exploit of new energy we move faster. Thus, it is obvious that our pace towards success has been accelerated.

In conclusion, we have more chance to success now, because the ranges of fields waiting for us to explore have been enlarged, and we are more advanced both theoretically and technologically.

topics_jasonUID: 2859308

As a human being in contemporary era, I optimistically convinced that it is easier to be successful now than the past.这句话跟论点相反，同意过去更容易 It is also true that our predecessors had already solved a great deal of problems and left the relatively more difficult ones to us, so some people may argue it is notshouldn't be easier to success now. However, after having a reasonable analysis of their concerns, I still believed that we are more close to the ultimate truth than ever before.
. H+ b# I+ Q4 Q9 o/ u- C
2 t7 W; _! b# V; \Some people may think that the problems left by our ancestors are those difficult ones这句话需要精炼跟第一段重复了, so they can't be solved easily. However, I want to highlight that our ancestor not only left problems but also had solved lots of them. More importantly, by learning how they solve the problems, we gain the methodology of dealing with the difficulty. Newton once said if I had seen further 这句话的翻译是这样么？是否需要加引号？前面if ，有点别扭。it was by standing one the shoulders of the Giants. Now, we are standing one one shoulder还加s么？the shoulders of numerous Giants, so it makes no sense that 这句话按照chinglish翻译是成功的可能性降低时没有意义的，跟前面不搭。the possibility of success should decrease.
4 e% [  L* R6 S, g
( V9 Q6 @: c0 g' m- f3 RSome people may further argue that that后面跟从句，加了逗号且句意不完整，感觉想表达，现在的成功，一个人…。to be successful now, one should have a firm grasp of much more different branches of knowledge than ever before; accordingly这个accordingly用的不太对。还不如拆开两句说 the path to the peak is more arduous. Nevertheless, theythey指的谁？people？ overlook the reality that it is through the combination of various branches of knowledge that we have created much more fields to research.这句话太长了，不理解。 That is to say,这种说法不常见。 more possibilities可能性？opportunity是不是好点或者chances？ are created. Furthermore, merely through the combination of newly formed fields, 这句倒装有点牵强can one make a difference to the world and stand himself out . stand `out (from sb/sth) be much better than sb/sth 远远超过某人[某事物]:. 这里缺一个过渡The success of Facebook is the best illustration, for it combines the thriving Internet technology with the traditional study of social intercourse.这段侧重点没看出，可能是学科交叉融合会创造更多机会？有点散，重点不明显。
# Q0 R' U- ^1 z4 Z: p: P! D2 Q( G" i& j, z
In addition, we are now equipped with efficient tools to facilitate our success unprecedentedly. With the help of computers, we can calculate quicker这是个形容词，前面是个动词; with the internet, communication becomes more convenient; with the exploit of new energy we move faster. Thus, it is obvious that our pace空间加速？ towards success has been accelerated.9 o( v8 N) M% q/ I# |  m8 t; c
* w, |/ A: a! g4 T/ ?  J- |( m/ \
In conclusion, we have more chance to success now, because the ranges of unknown fields这句话不给力，未知领域扩大跟能否成功没什么必然关系。 have been enlarged, and we are more advanced both 逻辑和实际跟你表达的主旨也没关系logically and practically.


建议：积累素材，少用长句，时态一致。

quote：
感谢给帮我改的很细，很感谢。  以至于我那个比较弱的错误 physicians和physicist...

关于例子的问题，基本也是杜撰，之前写的文章几乎全是说理，自己看了都想吐。 所以改变了策略，咱也不是牛人，超强的英语驾驭能力没有，只能靠一些例子取胜了，否则一个T的判卷老师一天看几千篇，他也得吐了，目的只有一个，让他看自己文章的2分钟内稍微轻松一点，就能高分。 至于积累，万金由式的东西，自己也很词穷，首先外国人名都写不全，主要就那么几个人，不过积累几个万金由很有必要。

关于论点方面，我基本选择一边驳倒，不给反方任何结合和机会，顶多用一个 absolutely，there is no denying...之类的写烂的句型放在段落里。 我这篇文章是因为有点特殊，因为我觉得本身这句话就是一个bullshit，开始也想立几个反面靶子让自己射，但发现自己没办法拿这个bullshit的东西理论。 其实仔细在考虑下这个论题，把重点放在前半句，easier  而不要放在后面比较可能会好点。 我这样写也是为了说明没有什么easier不easier的。

最后一段的 in addition 的论点，我也很无奈，总得写点什么，升华？为了凑字而已。

tony9个的那个我也看了，貌似是口语，感觉没什么帮助。建议看450另外还有一个叫seventeen的人总结的素材，貌似也没啥用，但最起码外国人名能记下来...呵呵。

感谢 ag。我在群里的ID是BAZINGA 需要帮助请留言。

fengyanhongUID: 2941762

12.13Do you agree or disagree? A job with more vacation time but a low salary is better than a job with a high salary but less vacation time.
希望有人批改，期待分组
Some people would like to take a lucrative job at the expense of losing the long vacation time, while others may think that it is more important to have vacation in their life, because they do not consider job as the most meaningful thing. As far as I'm concerned, the problem whether to take a higher salary job without the long time vacation or vice versa is much depend on the person' interest ,altitude towards job and the reality he confronted with. Either choice is reasonable.

In some people's eyes, the job is where their most interests rest, so much so that they do not value long time vacation,and they would rather consider the wealth they accumulated through their work is a significant symbol of their social status. If they are permitted to take along time holiday, it is highly possible that they has a feeling of lost and do not even know how to spend their spare time. In the movie Up in the Air, the hero is the proper example of this kind of people. He travelled in much of his working time to give speech, to help the company fire their stuff, and to realize his personal dream. On the one hand,he enjoy his job, taking his every business flight as a milestone in his career; on the other hand, he do not have a family to worry about, thus vacation has less meaning to him. To this kind of people, job is their only focus;it is understandable that they would like to choose a high salary job rather than the other one.

Other people, however, pay much attention to their life and recognize job merely as a part of their life. They take job as a method to earn them a desirable life rather than the way to accumulate money. As a result they would like to expect a more comfortable working environment,several nice people to relate with and more importantly a long time vacation. They focus much of their time to create themselves a colorful life, planning special gift for their beloved, experiencing different life in every corner of the earth, and tasting various food. Only a long time vacation can ensure them to carry out their plan. So to these people, a job with a long vacation time is more suitable.

Besides, people should not only take their interest and altitude into consideration, but also get down to the reality. Some people should shoulder the family burden from an early age, so it is responsible to place the salary to the first consideration. Some people have to take care of their old parents so it is better to have a job with long vacation. For example,my uncle lives too far away form my grandparents, so every year he would ask a month leave, to come to my grandparents’, otherwise they will miss him.

As a conclusion, people should choose their job-----a higher salary one or a long vacation time one-----according to their own situations, considering their altitude and reality.

fengyanhongUID: 2941762

The car has a greater influence on our society than the airplane has.
加入特训队第一篇 大家狠批
As the transportations become much more convenient today, people tend to argue though airplane is more advanced, the cars are still has a greater influence on our society. I agree with the statement for more people located in various places driving cars frequently than taking plane.

The number of people who can afford a car has increased recently. In developed countries it is likely to possess two cars in a family and even in developing countries like China, almost very family have a car. Some dozen years ago, the one who possesses a car in China always be regarded to the upper class. However, now the situation has been totally changed, those who do not have a car are recognized as lower class. That is the first aspect how cars change the people's life and altitude towards others. And if you take a look at the road now, especially in some metropolises of china, road are crowed with the cars and the lane designed for the bicycles has been narrowed to give way to the jammed cars. That is the second aspect how cars change the traffic system designing due to the increasing number of people who uses them. However, though airplane is useful, compare to the cars, not everyone can afford it and the airport is still outside the traffic center of the people's life.

The frequency of people using cars undoubtedly is much higher than the plane, so there is no way the plane can have more influence than the car. For one thing, not all people have the occasion to take plane, because plane are designed to cover long distance travelling, and people do not move from place to a far place every day. For another, not everyone would like to take plane, because some couldn’t afford the airplane tickets especially in developing countries, and taking trains are the considerable alternation for people who want to travel to some place far away and appreciate the beautiful scenery along the way. However, in weekday, commuters may choose cars to work, and in weekend, it is still convenient to drive a car to go shopping, to go to friends' house, and to take kids to park.

Last but not the least, you can drive a car to every place as long as the road will lead you to, while the airport is not own by every city. Still lots of people view airplane as a stranger, whereas cars have rooted in their life.

As a conclusion, the car has a grater influence on the society than the airplane, because they are shared by much more people frequently on all over the word.