Argument113,9,酒香,nofeelings

nofeelings811UID: 2388638

Argu113
The following was published by a consumer protection agency.

"Three years ago, So-Low launched a nationwide ad campaign, focusing heavily on sunny regions and distributing free sunglasses there. But although So-Low sunglasses cost less than higher-priced brands, they block a smaller proportion of the Sun's rays, including the type of rays known to damage the eyes even when the person wearing the sunglasses feels no discomfort. A recent study suggests that So-Low sunglasses can actually increase the risk of damage to people's eyes by creating a false sense of security. The study shows a sharp increase in the incidence of vision problems in the sunny regions over the past three years. These findings suggest that anyone concerned about eye damage from the Sun should avoid So-Low brand and instead either pay for higher-priced brands or wear no sunglasses at all."

The conclusion of the consumer protection agency can not agreed by me. Because we can not naively believe the survey; we can not judge one's feeling; we can not change the product in haste.

The survey rendered by agency can not give the strong proof for the disregarding of So-low. Firstly, the makers of the study and the volunteers is unknown, which can not spare the possibility that consumer protection agency make the study intentionally. They may have some issue with the company, so make the illegal survey to play trick to the So-low. Secondly, from the incidence, we really can not get the exact truth, because if the total number is too small, the increasing of the incidence does not count. Accordingly, the So-low may not have caused damages to eyes.

What's more, the author has the presuming that So-low sunglasses create a false sense of safety, which will make people more looking at the sun. However, this conclusion about feeling is not reliable, because we can not say we know how others think or feel. No survey about feelings, no saying about feel. So what about people has this false sense? Will the sun burn them more heavily? The answer is no, people will not look more at the sun just because they feel safe, and the more looking has the little influence to people under the sun, for as long as they are under the sun, their eyes will get hurt, less looking just make the hurt less, but has not relation with the sense of the safety.

Last but not the least, even if the So-low is harmful for the human, it is not convincing to wear expensive glasses or none, because we do not know whether these two ways better or worse than wearing So-low. So-low block a smaller proportion of rays sent by the sun, we can not say that the efficiency of the So-low is low, for the proportion blocked may be the most harmful. This is to say, So-low may prohibits harmful rays same as the high-priced ones, or even more. We can not criticize it only by the proportion.  And even if the bad efforts are the S-low, other products may not be better. As to wearing none, it may be more harmful, because the rays will going into eyes without any hinder.

Author do not do the survey carefully, and objectively judge ones thought, what's more, can not give the evidence that So-low is harmful exactly. All these lead to the bad conclusion. To protect eyes, we should not bother disregarding So-low, for the poor proof of the author.