ISSUE84 过去的知识对今天的作用

雨&彩虹UID: 132532

84"In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field."

这个是非问题主要是关于过去的研究成果对今天研究成果的影响问题.

第一 过去的科研成果为今天的研究提供了研究基础,科研方法, 提高了今日研究的效率, 从自然科学,社会科学,甚至是以ORIGINALITY著称的艺术领域都是这样的.人类的知识结构就是这样的螺旋型的上升过程,

第二,  应该关注的是不仅仅本学科的昔日研究成果对今天有极大的接见作用, 随之学科之间的联系性的加强.甚至跨学科的领域都会起到这种作用.

第三.一种研究真正能被称为变革性的,就在于它启发了新一轮的突破,所以针对任何的对教条的盲目遵从,和停滞不前,我们都应该反对.

大概写了点,剩下的自己补充吧

雨&彩虹UID: 132532

In any field of endeavor, we always acclaim over the fruit of certain research effort as a breakthrough from the past achievements within that field and thus concluded that they are revolutionary. It is plausible since no contribution can be legible be categorized as enlightening without confirmed ideas and rigid disciplines being over threw. After all, the structure of human knowledge is spiral-ascending process.

Some people may argue that revolutionary ideas and innovations emerge as a result of overthrowing the established theories and beliefs. Although it reveals truth about the path of how a new idea burgeons to life, they ignore crucial evidence that only by discovering the discrepancies of past theory and drew lessons from the research methodology and underlying assumption did new theories avoid making the same mistakes by turning to a new road aiming at a more fruitful ending. In the respect, we can trace every stream to its original source and every tree to its root. Past achievement has equipped modern people with basic rules and fundamental theories which were used by us conscious or unconsciously. Today, if an astronomer puts forward a new hypothesis, he does not have to go over point by point to substantiate that the earth revolves around sun and the existence of gravity. We are used to make use of the past achievement to nourish our own knowledge and increase efficiency and this can be observed frequently in scholar’s frequent quoting of their predecessors in this field.

It is impossible of any new development to emerge totally independent of past achievement in that field. Historical materials documented centuries equip modern historian with vivid and insightful record of what we cannot possibly perceive today. Physicians pursuing quantum theory should embrace rules theories and principle in classical physics as foundation. Musicians still get inspiration from Bach and Beethoven while writers drew materials from Shakespeare and Dante. If compared as a ladder to the sky, then each step forward acts as one rundle which finally lead to the greatest of human achievement.

In any field, people have to appeal to past experience and theories of predecessors. Someone may argue that, sometimes there are groundbreaking achievements in some area, which totally subvert or overthrow the former ones. But I should argue that no matter how illuminating and revolutionary these achievements may seem to be, a definite subversion is against the process of how a now theory can be put into being. The true development of a new breakthrough should rest in researcher’s keen inquiry into the feasibility of old theories, and during this procedure, some discrepancies ignite their skepticism which propel them to find new ways to better illustrate or supplement this theory and thus the appearance of a new theory.

Another phenomenon we should notice is that in an age where every field seem to interlocking with the other, it is impossible to simply assume that research of today are only influenced by past achievement within this field. 这里可以加上一些跨学科研究的例子.

Thus I agree fundamentally with the arguer’s point of view since he reasonably identity the relationship between the past achievement and today’ advancement. We should bear in mind that no discoveries pop up sporadically and each step is just adding one brick to the diversity of human knowledge and understanding of the whole world.

angeikimUID: 4857

观点：肯定过去的成果

如果完全否定过去的成果在一个所谓的完全空白的基础上面进行再创造几乎是不可能的。这个更意味着大量的人力财力的浪费。有这个时间还不如在前人的成果的基础上进行再创作更实际一些。而且再创造并不意味着非创新，而是另一种意义上的创新。
在这里可以对创新的含义进行扩充，不要仅仅把自己局限到一个很小的范围当中去。
在作文里尤其要注意这个方面，要对自己进行的定义给一个比较广的范围，否则，很不利。

yellowchildrenUID: 134407

题目中说“。。。。。。within that field”，那第二点会不会显得有点偏呢？？？
所以觉得对题目的准确翻译很重要。。。

enso1600UID: 135796

同意楼上的，呵呵

angeikimUID: 4857

题目中是有限制的。。

HYPHEEUID: 137707

我觉得楼主没有偏题，这是种发展的思维，是对原来的ISSUE的必要补充，有些ISSUE可以这样写。不知这种写法对不对？

littleFUID: 139665

写的，真TMD的好！偶算是开眼了，以前看得作文都是个鸟啊！
谢谢楼主！

paisleyUID: 64183

倒。。。表扬也可以干干净净地表扬吗。

littleFUID: 139665

可以，如果，还想听表扬的话：）

雨&彩虹UID: 132532

LITTLEF,呵呵, 你把PAISLEY气倒了我可是不饶你的.

因为我很喜欢她的.

还有不能贬低其他人的东西哦：）写东西都是慢慢的过程, 而且对学理科的尤其不容易的.

如果我写的东西还能对你有一点用处,那么我很高兴的.

littleFUID: 139665

阁下文字理解力还可以：）
不过，偶上面说得是你，不是你喜欢的paisley：）
你的英语应该很牛，我愿意学习你的语法，谋篇，其它可以算了。
因为文如其人，我们还是应该保持各自风格：）
另外，您刚刚投过一个魅力GG地网（只是奇怪难道GTER上有很多人用QQ吊MM或被吊么，不然您那么好心紧张提醒，真令人感动哦！）
现在又在这公布您所喜欢对象加以保护－－－－您放心，偶决不会说她一个字，动她一根汗毛，当然只要她不招我话：）

littleFUID: 139665

“what do u mean? just wanna kill a rival?Do not look at me with such a jealous survillance and Iam young and handsome.I can get sth I want easily yeh! Don"t worry about me.”
这是偶以前收到一个人写给我的，my answer is------------NO PROBLEM：）
我觉得你的文风跟他一样好，可惜他还是student in high school ：）
所以说网络可怕，你的提醒很应该，连高中生都想泡MM：）
还好，他没到手，太小了，呵呵

雨&彩虹UID: 132532

呵呵,还没弄清楚我的性别就说这样的话,不早了点吗

littleFUID: 139665

呵呵，刚才才夸过阁下文字理解力，怎么。。。我说的是“我觉得你的文风跟他一样好”，文风，UNDERSTAND?不是嘛，熟练使用英语如此------------我是查了一个字典才知道jealous survillance 的意思－－－－后面那个单词偶不认地：）水平菜鸟嘛：）