寄托天下
查看: 1890|回复: 7

[未归类] ISSUE提纲1.31 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
202
注册时间
2007-8-26
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2011-2-7 01:14:43 |显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 couson 于 2011-2-7 01:18 编辑

ISSUE提纲1.31
116,197,208,184,212,235,25


116.全球化的影响(因果类)
"With the growth of global networks in such areas as economics and communication, there is no doubt that every aspect of society—including education, politics, the arts, and the sciences—will benefit greatly from international influences."
随着全球网络的增长如经济和通讯整个社会的各方各面包括教育、政治、艺术和科学都从中获益非浅
Tips: 因为” the growth of global networks in such areas as economics and communication”所以” there is no doubt that every aspect of society—including education, politics, the arts, and the sciences—will benefit greatly from international influences.
1.(原因成立)经济和信息通讯的全球化是不争事实
     a)国际分工更细, 每个国家的经济都离不开别国. 波音飞机,日本(尾翼),意大利(复合材料),美国(设计,组装),法国(起落架)
     b)信息的交流更快了, 国家,领域作出决策的速度更快了
2.(推不出结论)未必所有国家都从经济和信息通讯的全球化中获益.
     a)发达国家获益更多, 发展速度加快
     b)欠发达地区基础差, 抓不住发展机会, 差距会更加大
3.(继续反对)未必所有领域都能从经济和信息通讯全球化中获益
     a)文化教育的沟通更方便, 政治对话的气氛会好转
     b)更加不确定的因素,全球化金融危机, 国际恐怖主义

197.(国与国的安定)事实类
"The material progress and well-being of one country are necessarily connected to the material progress and well-being of all other countries."
一个国家的生活质量提高和社会的安定是和其他所有国家的生活质量提高和社会安定密不可分的。
1.(让步)经济全球化让各国经济呈现出一荣俱荣,一损俱损
     a)WTO的促进trade
     b)美国次贷危机, 波及全球
     c)欧美市场的繁荣, 让亚洲等国的制造业也繁荣
2.(反对)经济全球化并非使所有国家同等受益
     a)发达国家收益较多, 并加速发展
     b)经济处于转型,总体比较落后的国家
3.(反对)国家大小也影响一国经济与经济全球化的关系
     a)大国经济体系比较完全,能够对生产自我消化
     b)小国为了从经济全球化中受益, 往往接入较深, 相应受国际化影响较大

行为***************************************************************************
208.(个人外观与社会价值)因果类
"The way people look, dress, and act reveals their attitudes and interests. You can tell much about a society's ideas and values by observing the appearance and behavior of its people."
人们的眼神、衣着和行动表现了他们的态度和兴趣。你可以通过观察人们的外表和行为来获知这个社会的想法和价值
Tips:前面一句是原因,后面一句是结果
1.(让步)通过观察人们的举止和外表有时可以判断出他们的思想和价值观.
     a)法国人french随街可见的热吻说明浪漫romantic, 德国人german在制造机械上的精益求精说明他们的严谨preciseness, 阿拉伯arabian女人戴面纱veil,说明女人地位高, 中国尊老爱幼respect the old and love the young说明 民族ethnic观念, 传统,美国人相对其他随意,说明他们更开
2.(原因不成立)但是,人们的外表, 衣着, 行为举止不一定反应这个人的态度和兴趣,
     a)人总是有两面性,会尝试掩盖自己的感情和倾向feelings and tendencies。社会复杂了,不被看透see through是最好的,高速的信息让人趋向统一作为百万富翁millionaire未必奢华luxury,衣冠楚楚未必是真君子, 官员的外表,言行举止都差不多,
3.(成立也推不出结果)这样会鼓励了更多人使用这种浅显的方式去看待他人,不准确,很肤浅
     a)一个社会的思想和价值未必通过这个社会人们的外表, 衣着, 行为举止反映出来. 交谈,合作, 相处
     b)即便人们的眼神, 衣着,行为举止能反映出一个社会的细想和价值, 作为观察者, 他能够把握其中的准确意义吗?

184.(理论与实际)事实类
"It is a grave mistake to theorize before one has data."
在没有数据之前就下结论是大忌
1.(让步)有了较为完备,详细的资料做基础, 人们的理论概括更接近于真实
     a)孟德尔豌豆试验, 基于大量关于豌豆形状数据, 终于发现遗传规律Pea plants The inheritance of traits Mendels Laws of Inheritance 现代的genetic engineering也是建立在此基础上的
2.(反对)很难确定什么时候数据算是够了
     a)数量上来讲是没有穷尽,
     b)需要时时概括
3.(反对)有些学科的资料收集极为困难
     a)即使有也是零星的,系统性,准确性也比较差,天体物理
     b)只能运用理论推测和想象力 魏格纳大陆漂移学说

212.(目标与过程)事实类
"If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable."
只要一个目标是值得去实现的那么任何努力都是有理由的。
1.(让步)如果一个目标有价值的,那么应该去为之努力
2.(反对)有时人类无法确定自己采取的手段会导致什么样的后果
     a)人类理性的有限性, 问题的复杂性, 虽然人们有时能清楚地指导自己想要什么,但是他们无法知道他们所要才去的实现目的的手段会导致什么样的后果,
     b)有可能, 手段最终造成了相反而与原始目标相冲突. 比如旅游业破坏了环境
3.(反对)人们会对我们盲目自信
     a)缺乏彻底而真诚的谦卑, 人类并不知晓他们的所作所为是否迈向毁灭的第一步,当他们执着一念, 甚至狂热时,所谓有价值的目标实际可能更会导致毁灭

235.(忠诚的好坏)定义类
"Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue. But loyaltywhether to one's friends, to one's school or place of employment, or to any institutionis all too often a destructive rather than a positive force."
大多数人都被教育成认为忠诚是一种美德。但是忠诚,不管是对一个人的朋友、一所学校、受雇的公司或者其他任何机构,经常是一件坏事而不是一件好事
1.(让步)没有原则的忠诚常使一个组织或者群体出现集体疯狂
     a)沙文主义
     b)纳粹德国
2.(反对)不能一概地说,忠诚是一种破坏力量
     a)增加组织的凝聚力, 人是社会性动物, 没有忠诚就没有组织, 可能就没有社会
     b)对维系友谊, 民族繁衍生息, 保持信仰,坚持信念有帮助
     c)国家民族团结御敌, 对普遍价值(平等,自由,生命尊严)的忠诚推动人性进步,员工对公司的忠诚促进生产效率提高
3.()关键在于我们如何理解忠诚
     a)需要一个健全的个体价值和信念做基础, 就是积极的力量
     b)反之很容易变成破坏的力量

25.(复杂与简单)事实类
"Anyone can make things bigger and more complex. What requires real effort and courage is to move in the opposite directionin other words, to make things as simple as possible."
每个人都能把事情搞大搞复杂。而真正需要努力的却是相反的—-------即要把事情越简单化越好
提纲
1.(让步)善于将问题简单化, 更有利于人们对问题的理解
     a)将问题简单化的过程, 不仅需要对问题本质透彻的认识, 还需要高超的概括与抽象思维能力
2.(反对)并非每个人都能把问题搞得大而复杂,
     a)为了研究真理, 人们不得不研究问题的方方面面和细枝末节, 因而问题显得大而复杂, 但是如果没有相当的理论, 经验, 及对问题的敏感, 未必人人都能把我问题的方方面面和细枝末节, 抓住问题大的理论背景和复杂细节
3.(反对)题目暗含有这样的判断: 简单的问题更接近与真理, 因而更有价值
     a)实际上问题的简单于复杂通问题本身是否真理是不相干的.
7-嵩嵩@3.2

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
5
寄托币
550
注册时间
2010-7-31
精华
0
帖子
3
发表于 2011-2-7 11:53:05 |显示全部楼层
25. "Anyone can make things bigger and more complex. What requires real effort and courage is to move in the opposite direction--in other words, to make things as simple as possible."
任何人都可以把事情简单复杂化,但是需要真正努力和勇气的恰恰相反,也就是说应该把事情变得尽可能的简单。


POV: AGREE

1、任何的事情都是可以被复杂化的,我们只需要假如很多干扰的因素,加上很多条件等等。就像是一句句子,可以被无线的扩充。

2、把一件复杂的事情变得简单需要努力和勇气,因为把一件事情变得简单,必须分析其症结(sticking point),把很多外界的不必要的因素去掉,这是需要完全的努力的。而在事情简单化之后,所呈现的真相可能是非常直接非常犀利的,甚至是会让人觉得受到伤害的。接受这样的直接的真相,需要一定的勇气。(divorce, government)

3、努力让事情变得简单是有勇气的体现,所以我们应该做的是努力让所有事情变得简单。

SUM UP: 任何事情都可以变得复杂,但是让事情变得简单对人的要求很高,这需要持久的努力和莫大的勇气。
你要静候 再静候 @3.1AW6G

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
5
寄托币
550
注册时间
2010-7-31
精华
0
帖子
3
发表于 2011-2-7 11:53:21 |显示全部楼层
116 "With the growth of global networks in such areas as economics and communication, there is no doubt that every aspect of society -- including education, politics, the arts, and the sciences -- will benefit greatly from international influences."
随着经济和通讯等领域的全球化,毫无疑问,社会的方方面面,包括教育、政治、艺术和科学,都将从这种国际化影响中获益非浅。

POV: PARTLY AGREE

1、教育领域的全球化可以让全世界人民无论在哪里都可以享受到最新的教育资源,同时有一个更好的信息平台。(Yale opening course; correspondence course)

2、政治上,各国高层领导可以通过电视会议等方式进行交流,可以促进全球经济的发展,共享很多信息。(vedio and teleconference, military operation play through networds)

3、艺术领域可以使各国艺术家更好的交流,艺术思想更好的传达。(movies shown around world, art exhibition, youtube)

4、科学领域可以加强科学家的交流,可以在第一时间公布最新研究成果。(IEEE international conference)

5、但是,不可否认的是,全球化虽然会带来很多好处,国际化的进程中依旧有很多问题。

SUM UP: 我们要努力解决现今存在的问题,以便更好的国际化,从而服务于教育政治艺术和科学等各个领域。
你要静候 再静候 @3.1AW6G

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
5
寄托币
550
注册时间
2010-7-31
精华
0
帖子
3
发表于 2011-2-7 11:53:40 |显示全部楼层
212 "If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable." [05/26; 06/4]
如果一个目标是值得的,那么追求目标的任何手段都是正当的。

POV: Disagree

1、人活着是为了体现自己的人生价值的,所以要做对自己、对社会、对国家有利的事情,这才是正确的存在方式。

2、如果他的手段是不合理不善良的,那么即便他达到了目标,也不不正当的。这是有违达到人生价值的初衷的,这样的追求目标就是去了起最初的意义。

3、一个目标的事先与否不仅取决于最终是否达到,还取决于达到目的的过程是否可取,如果过程是不正当的,那么即便达到目标也并不是真正意义上的达到。

SUM UP: 实现一个目标本身就是自身的提高,通过正当的手段应该是前提。
你要静候 再静候 @3.1AW6G

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
5
寄托币
550
注册时间
2010-7-31
精华
0
帖子
3
发表于 2011-2-7 11:53:51 |显示全部楼层
235."Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue. But loyalty—whether to one's friends, to one's school or place of employment, or to any institution—is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force." [05/26; 06/4]
大多数人被教育说忠诚是一种美德。但是,忠诚-无论对于朋友、学校、受雇公司或任何机构来说,经常都是一种有害而非积极的力量。

POV: DISAGREE

1、忠诚是一种美德。
你要静候 再静候 @3.1AW6G

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
5
寄托币
550
注册时间
2010-7-31
精华
0
帖子
3
发表于 2011-2-7 11:54:02 |显示全部楼层
88 "Technologies not only influence but actually determine social customs and ethics." [05/30; 06/3]
科学技术不但影响而且决定了社会风俗和道德规范。

POV: DISAGREE

1、科技影响了社会风俗和道德规范。科技的出发点在于创造更美好的生活,所以更有利于生活的科技被发明出来的时候,会影响与部分人的风俗习惯(US. car),同样,对道德规范也有所影响,让人们了解了更多伦理上的事情(electron microscope, Cloning)

2、但是科技不能决定社会风俗和道德习惯。因为这是由人的主观的社会认知而产生的,科技对这种认知的改变有影响,但是这种影响不起决定作用。起决定作用的还是人的价值观。

SUM UP: 科学技术的发展固然是好的,其对社会风俗和道德规范起到了影响作用,同时,企业收到社&道的制约。


TOPIC: ISSUE88 - "Technologies not only influence but actually determine social customs and ethics."
WORDS: 456          TIME: 00:59:21          DATE: 1/31/2011 8:16:15 PM

When we refer to technologies, we usually think of the great social changes in especially the social customs and ethics. Admittedly, as the speaker holds that technologies influence the social customs and ethics, it can never determine anything whenever the past, the present, or the future. What determines social customs and ethics could only be people's sense of worth.

At first, it must be admitted that thanks to the technological development, the lifestyle of the society has changed a lot. This exactly agreed with the pursuance of technologies that to bring a better life to the society, and made people feel enjoyable. The invention of electricity must be the greatest marvel which saved people from the endless darkness. Yet people still work in the day time but not in the night for that their habits and customs makes them day-worker. We should say that after the invention of cars, the U.S. people come crazy about cars and the U.S. is so-called country on the wheel. But there are still a number of people who prefer take other transportations such as bus, train, ship, and bike. A few years ago, the cloning technology had been discussed through the newspaper, the internet, the television and some other media like that. It is about a ethical issue that whether to clone human beings or not. Eventually, the technologies lost out to the ethics and the plan had run aground.

Technologies do have influences to social customs and ethics yet what they have are only influences and that could never be the determinant. No matter the intentions of electricity, cars or the cloning, their contributions of the society can only be influence and improvement. And, unfortunately, the technologies are decided by the social customs and ethics, which are determined to people's value of worth. For instance, when people found out that the physical quality is better in the day than night, although there are electricity that could supply the light, they wouldn't. The social customs told them what the better are. So does the cloning case. The existing ethics let people quarrel with whatever is contrary to ethics. People's social customs and ethics were formed thousands of years age, by the time they have the value of worth. The used the value of worth to judge things and decide what to do. If the things were common, it became the social customs and ethics. Therefore, technologies could not determine social customs and ethics anytime.

As a conclusion, it will always be good that the technology has developed, and influence the society customs and ethics deeply, nevertheless, it has been determined by the inner value of worth. And owing to that, the technology could be taken into use correctly and reasonably.
你要静候 再静候 @3.1AW6G

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
5
寄托币
550
注册时间
2010-7-31
精华
0
帖子
3
发表于 2011-2-7 11:54:16 |显示全部楼层
184 "It is a grave mistake to theorize before one has data." [05/17; 06/1]
在没有证据之前就得出理论,是重大错误。

POV: DISAGREE

1、(诚然)有些理论是从data中推导出来的(Kepler third law)

2、(但是)不是所有的理论都是可以先有数据支持的,尤其在quantum physics, theoretical physics等(special theory of relativity, the big bang theory, Schr odinger cat is a macroscopic distinguishing quantum superposed state. )

3、data对理论只能起到支持作用,并不能够代表理论本身。一个理论的价值在于他本身,而不在于他的研究过程。

SUM UP: 从是否有data来判定一个理论是非常不明智不合理的,我们应该理性的去理解一个理论。



TOPIC: ISSUE184 - "It is a grave mistake to theorize before one has data."
WORDS: 566          TIME: 00:51:17          DATE: 2/7/2011 10:52:26 AM

With the science and technology development, the more and more theories have came out. Some of them are the conclusion of a mass data and experiences, while some of them are only a theory. We, almost people around the world have an acceptable attitude towards the both ways the theories built. That is to say, just against the speaker's assertion, it has never been a mistaken to theorize before one has data.

Admittedly, data are the best support to the theories. With the data, the theories could become easily understand, greatly proved, and strongly supported. A theory without data is just like a car without an instruction book. We know it can work but we have no ideas where it could work, and how would it be when it works. But when there are some data given, everything would be solved. We know its faction, its speed, its good and short aspects and we can control it even though there are some unwilling accidents happened. For instance, Kepler has found the third law of the celestial movement just after had having a lot of researching and studying of the huge amount of data. The Third Law has profoundly influence in the astronomy study. Thus, anyone could not neglect the importance of data.

But never the importance could be the only and must factor. It would never be a grave mistake to theorize before one has data, though data always play a remarkable role during the researching and study of any theories. What data is could only be the support, the core of a theory should always be the theory itself, which could never been shake and changed with data. When we were reminded of some prominent events in the history, we might find it true. Stephen Hawking devotes his whole life in discovering the original of the space and had the big bang theory years ago. The big bang theory was a fantastically theory with no real data except the supporting of the other facts in physics, even if the big bang theory is true. But there is no reflection that would influent the theory and the acceptation of the theory, or even the theory itself. Therefore, the consideration of theorizing without data prove before to be a mistake was completely mistaken.

However, as we have stated, if the theory is the soul, the data would be the physical body which has meat, blood, skeleton in it. The only soul is unreal and cannot be understand and accepted rapidly and easily. When it has its body, it becomes real so that we can see it, feel it, touch it, even talk to it; we can get how it work for real and how it been put into practice; we can compare it with some other similar theories; we can figure out what's the difference of these theories; we can point out the misunderstandings. That's just like the car with a skillful driver, a stage with a excellent actor, a patient with an experience doctor, everything would be solved smoothly and technically.

To prove the theories with enough data is the best way to set up a theory and to theorize. However, there is still something we don't have reality ways to explain and to prove; the data always comes after a theory had been given. Therefore, data are not the only and must method before theorize.
你要静候 再静候 @3.1AW6G

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
5
寄托币
550
注册时间
2010-7-31
精华
0
帖子
3
发表于 2011-2-7 11:54:33 |显示全部楼层
197 "The material progress and well-being of one country are necessarily connected to the material progress and well-being of all other countries." [05/16; 06/0]
一个国家的生活质量提高和社会的安定是和其他所有国家的生活质量提高和社会安定密不可分的。

POV: DISAGREE

1、一个国家的物质进步是和其他国家有关系的(Marco Polo <IlMilione>, the silk way), 但是这种关系并不是必须的(the former China)

2、一个国家的社会安定和其他国家也是有关系的(World War II),但是这种关系也并不是必须的(the upheaval in Cario, the Iraq war).

3、世界是一体的,虽然可能不收其他国家影响,但是会导致全球的整体发展变慢。(Great Depression)

SUM UP: 一个国家的生活质量提高和社会的安定与其他所有国家的生活质量提高和社会安定是有一点关系的,这更关系到国际物质进步和国际安全,所以每个国家都应该努力提高自己的物质、社会发展,共同创建一个和谐的美好社会。
你要静候 再静候 @3.1AW6G

使用道具 举报

RE: ISSUE提纲1.31 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
ISSUE提纲1.31
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1230047-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部