- 最后登录
- 2012-11-12
- 在线时间
- 36 小时
- 寄托币
- 99
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2010-7-19
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 72
- UID
- 2857250

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 99
- 注册时间
- 2010-7-19
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
发表于 2011-3-17 16:16:28
|显示全部楼层
3.14 独立
Teacher should or not talking their social political viewsto student in the class.9 A* e6 b2o- }( D, v) D
Students go to school for taking in moreknowledge as well as what kind ofpeople they should be(shaping their own conception of the world).我的理解,不然语法有错误 However, if teachers should(删) teach everything they are eager to instruct to students,such as sensitive topics, has already caused people’s attention. People helddifferent opinions due to different background. From my perspective, teachersare not supposed to talk their social political views to students in classsince and there are some reasons for my viewpoints.
: U% f6 U2K" {0 e! ], b' l4 W
8 e/ ^6 f9 @! J, R F: Q
When teachers are talking about certain tendersubjects, they are inclined to see those subjects
(这个词在这里什么意思?)through colored lenses. In this case, students might beasked false or extreme views about social or political issues, especially onthe condition that students are not mature enough to tell right from wrong. Howcould we, in this case, ignore the harmful impact on students? A real instancehappened in a small town of the United States. A teacher, whose name is Johg Pong,was willing to being a politician in the past, but finally he was failed forhis ultra words and deeds. Then, he became a teacher in an unknown high schoolfor earning a living. However, he did not purely teachtextbook knowledge. Instead of it, he spreads reactionary thought tostudents frequently in that he was not resign to end up his political life. Atlast, parents came to school to complain about him since those students hethought were infected to possess extreme thought. From it, we can know, certainill-intended teachers would like to regard school as a place to show themselvesin an unfriendly way which is detrimental to students.
(有些词用的很奇怪)例子有点罗嗦
5 T6 f5 L7 [0 d* H7 [' e0 n& ^4 t) |
Parents are hoping(always hope) for goodeducation to make their children be (删) better which isdeveloping good character, being happy and improving communicative competence. (Parents always intend to bring their children to betterschools in order to have their children well educated so that they can developgood character, live happy life and improve communication skills as well. 嗯,我想可以这么改)However, if teachersthrew plentiful time to talk about social and political views, the behavior cantotally against parents’ original intention. How terrible it is? Besides,students have no enough time to absorb knowledge, raise questions and finally,it must influence their performance in academic examination, let alone they canstore enough knowledge for future career and making through preparations forresearching deeper things.
(再加上一个中心句就更好啦)3 y$ {+ H2 c0 c1y; X( I: T
! s. |" S' @! ~; d6 b# k# q! X
Admittedly, teachers are, after all, adultswhose thought is much mature than students. However, in case of listening toteachers blindly, parents should guide their children to consider things from amore accurate and may be(maybe even) different perspective and leave them enough space forforming their own view.s
- p9 `7 S b* h! [" y
To wind up, since students are relativelyreaching less people than adults do, they lack the skill of distinguishingthings. In this way, teachers should not talk their social and political viewsto students in the class. Incidentally, we can not totally deny the behavior onthe grounds that if good parenting represents to students, it will be good forthem to learn to observe things from different perspectives.
真是抱歉,批改的这么晚= =。。。。。 |
|