niehanmj的作文帖 daily writing.

qfaithUID: 2657846

5.9  综合已改好  我的上传了 提交晚了 麻烦了 https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=1257246&pid=1775177287&page=3&extra= 30# niehanmj

lavinia7479UID: 3025869

Hi, I am waiting for your independent writing~~~^^

niehanmjUID: 3005699

5.12综合  上传晚了不好意思

tidus_xuanUID: 172013

5.13 综合 改好了

niehanmjUID: 3005699

5.13综合写作 谢谢~

xiangtuoUID: 3047550

In the lecture, the professor contradicts the declaration in the passage that it is beneficial to the damaged forest and the economy to remove dead trees from one area, which is called salvage logging.
To begin with, the speaker says that
removing dead trees does not make the right position for tree growth, rapid(是要表达迅速的意思吗？句子逻辑有点问题哦) removal of dead trees may cause the soil lack of nutrients that are indispensible. This opposes the idea stated in that passage that salvage logging may facilitate the recovery of new trees.

Secondly, in respond to the opinion in the reading text that salvage logging is able to relieve the damages done to the forest and the weaknesses of reproduction of harmful insects, the lecturer argues that decaying wood is not only the habitats of spruce bark beetle, but also provides habitats for birds. Also, he mentioned that the presence of spruce bark beetle is of little damage to the forest.

Lastly, the professor discusses that removing dead trees often requires the assistance of helicopters or other expensive vehicles. What's more, besides the local residents, outer people may have to engage in such activities which will definitely cost a lot of money. All discussed above reject the viewpoint that salvage logging has positive effects in economy.

我还没有做到这篇TPO，所以只能按照独立的来改啦！语言没有问题，每个观点也介绍的很清楚，就只有那句话可能用词有些问题，有小歧义。
如有异议，欢迎联系！~~

tidus_xuanUID: 172013

5.13 综合 改好了

niehanmjUID: 3005699

我的5.14综合写作 TPO4

das_postkarteUID: 3012913

改好了~但是只是改了语法。