0689的作文贴 求拍 很拍 往死里拍 用白砖拍 含4.23竹子的预测范围

0689UID: 2843159

说实在的英语不太好 作文水平有限 但是 4 23要考了 求恨拍 拜托 下面是作文 和竹子老师给的范围不知道 是不是有人发过了
1。09.11.07NA
2. 2009.10.31NA   
    3. 2009.10.17NA  
    4. 2009.10.10CN  
    5.2009.9.11NA  
    6.2009.4.3NA  
    7.2009.2.27NA                                         
    8.2010.1.30NA                                       
9.2010.2.13NA                        
    10.2010.3.12NA                    
    11.2010.3.20
作文综合作文
hydroelectric power plants的好处，阅读部分里说他有三个好处
1 Low Cost
2 污染少low pollution
3 对动物危害小the water paths protect wildlife
lecture逐条反驳
1、不省cost。建造DAM前期的费用很大，所以不是LOW COST.
2、二氧化碳照样有。DAM 会使PLANTS DECAY, 这DECAY 会产生很多CO2
3、也不是保护所有鱼类的，对动物危害很大，有些鱼游不上去就死了。
Lecture: disagree
1. Account of the research cost for selecting location and building cost, the cost of
hydroelectric plants is not low
2. Hydroelectric plants produce the same amount of greenhouse gases as fossil fuel
plant do
3. Water paths cannot protect all fishes; an example in England, a kind of fish cannot
use the water path as salmon do
独立写作
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is often not a good thing to
move to a new city or a new country because of the lost of old friends?


The reading and lecture both discuss the hydroelectric in which water power is used to produce electricity. The reading author states that the hydroelectric plant is a benefit to environment and should be spread in the world, while the professor believes hydroelectric also destroys the environment.

The first point the reading passage’s author makes is that the hydroelectric plants are cheaper than others. When it is put to use, it costs
little. However，the professor says that the cost of hydroelectric plants is not low, because building cost and the research cost for selecting location is huge.


Also, according to the reading passage, hydroelectric prower is low pollution, because it don’t burn coal and don’t produce any greenhouse gas. The professor, whereas, holds the opposite lecture that since the dam can make plant decay and the decaying of plant results in CO2. Hydroelectric plants bring out the same amount of greenhouse gas as fossil fuel does.

Finally, the reading reveals that since hydroelectric need to built a lot of water paths, the paths will protect wildlife and provide water source. The professor says that water paths can’t protect all fishes. For example in England, a kind of fish can’t use the water path as salmon do.

In short, the reading passage approves that hydroelectricity is more valueless than others while the professor disagrees with that assertion.



独立写作：
On contemporary society, the friendship is as importance as it was the past. However, when asked about whether you concern about the loss of old fiends if you move to a new city or country, people have a dilemma. According to my personality and experience, I cling to an unshakeable belief that we will not lose real friendly even moving to another place.

Basic to any understanding is that as the technology develops, we may not be afraid of losing friends and may keep in touch with people through high technology, even visit each other several times per year. Taking me for example, I have to move to the Harbin for the reason of studying in the university. At the beginning, it was so worried for me to leave my old friends. But now, by sending massage and MSN, I find they are just like around me. The high technology makes me believe that our friendship will be forever.
Further lending credence to my position is that if we move away from our old friend, we may even become much closer to them. Long distance always decreases quarrel and arguments among friends and makes people forgot their disadvantages and bad habits. “A distance, can there be respect; have to respect, friendship will last forever.” You Jin, a famous author, said. So the distance wouldn’t make us lose the friend, even make the friendship grow.

Additionally, if you move to a new place, it is inevitably that we will make new friends. However, our new friend are unlikely make us forgot old ones, even sometimes new people remind you of your old friend. I can think of no better illustration that the statistic. Experts from the Department of Sociology in Peking University pointed out that the people in China averagely have five closed friends in one place. True friendship will not change no matter how far the distance is between friends.

Therefore, due to the above mentioned reason. I reinforce my stand point that long distance will not decrease real friendship. Although you can’t see each other as often as you want after moving to a new place, we all believe that the old friends will become forever friends.