【新G-first小组大帖】

cjlingyuanUID：2876233

删除了

cjlingyuanUID：2876233

第1次作业（5月25）：
1. As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
（原因推结果类）
第2次作业（5月27）：
2.To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
（为目的给建议类）
第3次作业（5月29）：
3.Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
第4次作业（5月31）：
4.Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
第5次作业（6月2）：
Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive. Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.

yogurt4UID：198389

占位

小颜UID：2875106

那个。。。有没有传新的issue题库上来吖？我找不到。。。

kamiaaaUID：2703810

０定金（托福）替кao 【QQ1677265905】【QQ1439324494】--(出成绩后付款,１００%无风险）
Dear TOEFL Test Takers,
Are you already tired of preparing for TOEFL?
Why don’t you just pass the test and improve your English after you end up in the US which is the same to you?
Here we have.....
业务流程:
A,您将需要提供您的预计最晚考试时间,分数要求,考 点偏好,以及本人护照和身份证上的头像照片。我们将精 心为您挑选枪手,并把枪手照片传给您,待您确认是否愿 意该枪手受理此单以及具体考试时间。
B,确认订单后,您需要将报名费用充入您本人的NEEA 账户,并且报名。
C,您将需向我们提供您的NEEA账户和密码。此号码由 您本人,本公司,以及枪手三方暂时共同持有(“暂时”的 更多详情请见“E”)。向我们交付账户和密码表示订单正 式生成,无特殊情况不可推改签。在三方必须共同持有账 户时您若更改密码后果自负。
D,枪手考试并且等待成绩。教育部公布成绩的时间周期 为两周,但根据大量经验表明,在考后的第八个工作日通 常会提前出结果。
E,I 分数达到您所要求标准,便是流程最后一步,付款 结账。结账后您的账户密码可以随意修改。II 极少数替考分数未达到要求的订单对于任何公司, 个人都是客观存在并且无法避免的。若本公司在分数上没 有达到您的要求,您可以免费使用未达到要求的成绩,或 者我们可以免费为您重考,因此生成的报名费和可能生成 的证件费,差旅费一律由我公司承担。
  付款方式可以从见分后支付宝转账和见分后 银行转账两项中任选。
   0定金替кao----我们的团队均由专业的托福кao试枪手为您服务，分数保证90+，100+，110+，专业操作，值得信赖To have more details, please reach us via: http://toeflanswer.info/toeflanswer.info/man_ha_dun_tuo_fu_zhu_kao.html(本网站服务器在美国,有时候受到gov影响,打开较慢,请各位考生稍等几秒)
【QQ1677265905】  【QQ1439324494】

yuanli.peiUID：3085432

哈，今天提交作业 我是3号 ada

第一次作业
题目
1. As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
提纲：
1. 机器不能代替人思考
2. 先进的技术创造了更多的思考的机会。

正文：
The twenty-first century is marked by rapid development of advance technology. In such situation, the speaker claims that as people becoming increasingly relying on technologies to solve problems, human’s ability of thinking will surely deteriorate. In my opinion, however, new technology only brings convenience to people and they cannot think for human. Instead of deteriorating human’s ability of thinking，technologies might free people’s thinking.  

First，if we think about the nature of problems that we technology helps us to solve, we will understand how the possibility of thinking has been enlarged rather than diminished. A lenient example lies in the usage of computer, which is probably the most prevalent machine people faced in daily life. It is indisputable that we are relying more on word processers such as Micro Office to record messages rather than using papers. But it is clear that novels and articles come from the minds of writers, not the word processers. Computer is a tool for representing the outcome of thinking, not a thinking subject. This is the same with printing machine, telephone, and so forth. In fact, advanced technologies only make our life more comfortable. They did not take our place to think; needless to say deteriorate human’s ability to think.

Moreover, people’s increasing reliance on technology also creates an unprecedented demand for learning. Nowadays, a great deal of advanced machines is designed so complicated that people cannot control them without attend training to master certain professional knowledge. One of the most productive cotton factories in my city, for instance, requires the employees to attend training courses twice every month ever since they introduced a new spinning machine, a large, complicated albeit productive machine. If you think about it, even a washing machine nowadays calls for special study to its instruction in order to apprehend the function of each button set on it. Moreover, the development of advanced technology actually calls for more creative thinking. Clearly, the demand for thinking resulting from the increasing usage of technology in the present is virtually greater than the past. Hence, rather than deteriorate human’s thinking ability, technologies might enhance human’s thinking abilities by creating larger demand for people to exercise their minds.

In short, from what we have discussed above, we can easily draw the conclusion that the increased reliance on new technology will only bring comfortable environment for people to solve problems. They do not take human’s place to think or decrease the demand for thinking. Rather, advanced technologies have created many chances for people to think and exercise their mind, thus enhancing human’s thinking abilities instead of deteriorating them.

kamiaaaUID：2703810

０定金（托福）替кao 【QQ1677265905】【QQ1439324494】--(出成绩后付款,１００%无风险）
Dear TOEFL Test Takers,
Are you already tired of preparing for TOEFL?
Why don’t you just pass the test and improve your English after you end up in the US which is the same to you?
Here we have.....
业务流程:
A,您将需要提供您的预计最晚考试时间,分数要求,考 点偏好,以及本人护照和身份证上的头像照片。我们将精 心为您挑选枪手,并把枪手照片传给您,待您确认是否愿 意该枪手受理此单以及具体考试时间。
B,确认订单后,您需要将报名费用充入您本人的NEEA 账户,并且报名。
C,您将需向我们提供您的NEEA账户和密码。此号码由 您本人,本公司,以及枪手三方暂时共同持有(“暂时”的 更多详情请见“E”)。向我们交付账户和密码表示订单正 式生成,无特殊情况不可推改签。在三方必须共同持有账 户时您若更改密码后果自负。
D,枪手考试并且等待成绩。教育部公布成绩的时间周期 为两周,但根据大量经验表明,在考后的第八个工作日通 常会提前出结果。
E,I 分数达到您所要求标准,便是流程最后一步,付款 结账。结账后您的账户密码可以随意修改。II 极少数替考分数未达到要求的订单对于任何公司, 个人都是客观存在并且无法避免的。若本公司在分数上没 有达到您的要求,您可以免费使用未达到要求的成绩,或 者我们可以免费为您重考,因此生成的报名费和可能生成 的证件费,差旅费一律由我公司承担。
  付款方式可以从见分后支付宝转账和见分后 银行转账两项中任选。
   0定金替кao----我们的团队均由专业的托福кao试枪手为您服务，分数保证90+，100+，110+，专业操作，值得信赖To have more details, please reach us via: http://toeflanswer.info/toeflanswer.info/man_ha_dun_tuo_fu_zhu_kao.html(本网站服务器在美国,有时候受到gov影响,打开较慢,请各位考生稍等几秒)
【QQ1677265905】  【QQ1439324494】

kid_gaoyuanUID：3085409

写了一个小时１０分钟

学号　１
递交次数　１

有点多下次改正

As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
（原因推结果类）

outline :
        disagree
        reason:  Technology is not the only source of the problem
                   Repairing and using needs basic ideas of technology. Exemplify normal use of computer in our society.
                   Developing that is driven by humans' desire needs people to think even more . Exemplify Programming
                  
                  
        I do not agree with the statement that “As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate”. In all likelihood, people tend to think that technology will cause essential problems that are noticed in our daily life including people  become more lazy about considering make contribution to the society and  people do not need to study so much to understand the method of dealing with complicated machines . Under this circumstance,  if a person still upholds the idea of  that technology can lead the progression of humans' ability , the person would be  thought by the normal people as the ignorance and naivety of knowing our nature. Nevertheless, I still think that the statement has its confusions that must be clarified .
        First of all , the principle that I hold for this idea is that for identifying the reason of this problem, people should,however, consider whether it is a problem caused by increasing the significance of the role of modern technicals  or a problem of influence of the original nature of human which has been existing on this world for so long time . The technology is only a small factor of initiating the problem that we have in our societies  nowadays . And such kind of factor is driven by the deeper catalysis which is , as we may see  also in the marketing field, the desire of increasing the living standard . So for providing the an acceptable analysis and solution, people should find a way of controlling the system , and especially for constraining the desire . On the contrary , if we ignore the importance of caring this backhanded factor we will be only enjoying the laziness and do not think about any thing.
        Simultaneously,  my opinion came from the fact that although the technologies are ready-made for most of the population in the world, we still need to consider the utilize of it . As a consequence , we must learn new things and train ourselves to do them . If we take account of using the computer, the whole system including files system, interruptions and  networking is ,actually, not a simple thing at all so that we indeed need to specify the way of mastering it. And it finally will be the assistant of ours. Moreover, the more technology we want to use can require more energy of studying therefore this virtually proved that technology has its supportive side on this sophisticated issue .
        Aside from the previous provisos listed above , the argument also has another drawback on the answer of a question that how does the technology come to the world. As we all know that the engineers are responsible for providing complexed systems which is the output of so many years cooperation and splendid wisdom . In this case , the more complicated the systems are, the more thinking is needed in the projects. Accordingly, if people want to increase the productivity and enjoying the leisureliness of their own , they need to study more first in order to find new road of making increment in engineering . After all ,Even more thinking would be required if they hope to do research for systems. For example, the algorithms of   programming are like one of this kind of activities which we cannot conclude a result easily but inversely we should perform massive researches.
        To sum up, the statement has demand to be reconsidered carefully and to be examined by researches.  Being open-minded to technology is important and by developing the trustful technologies, we will gain a bright future that will give us optimism.

cjlingyuanUID：2876233

学号：5
第一次作业：As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
提纲：不同意
1.从历史发展的过程来看，技术在不断的进步，人类思考问题的能力是在不断提高，从来都没有退后。
2.技术能够帮人类解决一些操作层面上的东西，但是真正的想法都是来自人类，人类的思维能力不可能被取代，也不会因为技术的使用而衰退。
3.让步，技术在某一些方面确实让人类减少了认识的能力。如
4.但是，我们必须清楚哪些是技术帮我们解决的，哪些是技术不能为我们解决的。
正文：
Nowadays, people use a lot of new technology to help us to do a variety of work and to keep us away from tedious repeated work. Some people just feel relieved to let the work done automatically, but some of us worry about human’s thinking ability will deteriorate as the author stated. Having some concerns is a good thing, but I could not agree with the author’s view. Since all these machines and equipments based on advanced ideas all come from the intelligent people around us, without humankind these technology could never appeared, so how could it possible that using of technique will decrease our thinking ability.
Judging from the process of historical development, technology is improving all the time, and so does the ability of human thinking. When humans were still primitives, people took advantage of stones and sticks as their tools to assist for finding food and protecting race. In the industrial age, we used the machines to assist to produce, and it improved production efficiency a lot. Now in information age, we could use computers to help us do a lot of work, and the realization of informatization already freed a lot of individuals from heavy work. From the stones and sticks to computers, the technology surely improved a lot, and also surely no one can say present human’s thinking ability is worse than our ancestors. We humankind actually improved a lot too.
Technology can help mankind to solve some actual problems, but the real thoughts are from human. The thinking ability of human could not be in recession, we actually think many of the more difficult problems than before. An example to illustrating is the way we dealing with data. We used the abacus to calculate for a long time, and now computer take place of it. We rely on computer to deal with various data for us, and without of it we may feel lost. Even though we seem couldn’t leave the computer, we should know that our ability is still there. Based on the basic work done by the computer, we would do some more important things. We used the result of data analysis, and then make our own decision. The computer could not make this for us.
Admittedly, in some aspect a person’s quick reaction will be reduced because long time to use these alternatives of advanced equipments. For example, the use of GPS systems will, to some extent, deteriorate someone’s abilities of sense of direction. But we must tell the difference, sense of direction is not a kind of thinking ability, rather is the basis for human to think. Since we could use exterior source more convenient, we should use it to make our think more powerful.
From the aforementioned analyses, thinking ability is a far more high-level thing. In contrast, technology is only a tool to help us think effectively. People rely on technology to increase their ability, not deteriorate it.

cjlingyuanUID：2876233

序号	题号	原因推结果
1	1	1. As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
2	4	4. Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
3	18	18. The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
4	44	44. Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
5	49	49. Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own. Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
6	58	58. Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline; students cannot be motivated by school or college alone.
7	64	64. The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
8	70	70. Claim: Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's major field of study. Reason: Acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated.
9	87	87. Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future. Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
10	89	89. Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system. Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
11	105	105.Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.
12	112	112. Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated.
13	120	120. Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation must be the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists. Reason: Great achievements by a nation's rulers, artists, or scientists will ensure表示充分 a good life for the majority of that nation's people.
14	133	133. Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. Reason: The world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past.
15	134	134. Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.

cjlingyuanUID：2876233

语法和内容的问题基本上很好，就没怎么改。
主要是逻辑方面，我提出了一些疑问，也是我自己的疑问。
As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
（原因推结果类）
outline :
disagree
reason: Technology is not the only source of the problem
Repairing and using needs basic ideas of technology. Exemplify normal use of computer in our society.
Developing that is driven by humans' desire needs people to think even [url=]more .[/url][l1] Exemplify Programming

I do not agree with the statement that “As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate”. In all likelihood, people tend to think that technology will cause essential problems that are noticed in our daily life including people become lazier about considering make contribution to the society and people do not need to study so much to understand the method of dealing with complicated machines. Under this circumstance, if a person still upholds the idea of that technology can lead the progression of humans' ability, the person would be thought by the normal people as the ignorance and naivety of knowing our nature. Nevertheless, I still think that the statement has its confusions that must be clarified.
First of all, the principle that I hold for this idea is that for identifying the reason of this problem, people should, however, consider whether it is a problem caused by increasing the significance of the role of modern technicals or a problem of influence of the original nature of human which has been existing on this world for so long time. The technology is only a small factor of initiating the problem that we have in our societies nowadays. And such kind of factor is driven by the deeper catalysis which is, as we may see also in the marketing field, the desire of increasing the living standard. So for providing an acceptable analysis and solution, people should find a way of controlling the system, and especially for constraining the desire. On the contrary, if we ignore the importance of caring this backhanded factor we will be only enjoying the laziness and do not think about anything.
Simultaneously, my opinion came from the fact that although the technologies are ready-made for most of the population in the world, we still need to consider the utilizing of it. As a consequence, we must learn new things and train ourselves to do them. If we take account of using the computer, the whole system including files system, interruptions and networking is, actually, not a simple thing at all so that we indeed need to specify the way of mastering it. And it finally will be the assistant of ours. Moreover, the more technology we want to use can require more energy of studying therefore this virtually proved that technology has its supportive side on this sophisticated issue.
Aside from the previous provisos listed above, the argument also has another drawback on the answer of a question that how does technology comes to the world. As we all know that the engineers are responsible for providing complexed systems which is the output of so many years’ cooperation and splendid wisdom. In this case, the more complicated the systems are, the more thinking is needed in the projects. Accordingly, if people want to increase the productivity and enjoying the leisureliness of their own, they need to study more first in order to find new road of making increment in engineering. After all, Even more thinking would be required if they hope to do research for systems. For example, the algorithms of programming are like one of this kind of activities which we cannot conclude a result easily but inversely we should perform massive researches.
To sum up, the statement has demand to be reconsidered carefully and to be examined by researches. Being open-minded to technology is important and by developing the trustful technologies, we will gain a bright future that will give us optimism.
我总结你的全文思路，不知道对不对。
第一段承认确实有依赖技术而变懒的现象，但是并不同意文章的观点
第二段说技术并不唯一的原因，真正背后的原因是人们提高生活水平的欲望
第三段是你不同意是因为即便现在有很多现成技术，人们还是需要努力学习去运用这些技术
第四段是文章的观点忽略了技术是怎么来的这样一个事实，以编程算法为例，其实技术越高明，对人的思考能力要求越高。
第五段，总结

整体来看，每一段的观点和语言表达都很好。但是我感觉第二段和后面3、4段很不搭配。因为第二段的感觉是你承认人的能力减低了，但是技术不是唯一的原因，背后真正的原因是the desire of increasing the living standard。第二段为什么要这样写，我没明白。第三段和第四段很好，一个是虽然有技术，人类还是需要学习运用这些技术；另一个是技术来源于人类，技术越高，对人的能力要求越高，都能很好的支持观点：人的能力并没有衰退。

另一方面，也是我自己的一个巨大的疑问：写issue和argu的区别到底在哪？
我在看你的作文时反复看了OG范文，想这个问题。我感觉issue就是需要明确自己的观点（同意、不同意、中立分析什么时候同意什么时候不同意），至于对作者逻辑的批判是为了辅助支持自己的观点，可以说但不能花大篇幅去论证作者的逻辑错误。而argu就是全文论证作者的逻辑，且基本上没有例子。但是issue需要有大量合适的例子。
所以感觉你的例子少了点。

我自己也实在困惑，不知道这样批改对不对，有空讨论一下吧。嘿嘿

cjlingyuanUID：2876233

kid_gaoyuanUID：3085409

学号　１
递交次数　２
agree
        outline:
        1 the most important is the culture . Big cities are the big component of it
        2 it contains economic sign and politic characters
        3 but one thing need to point out is only study major may cause confusion


I agree with the statement that “to understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities”. In all likelihood, people tend to think that the only way to know the main characteristics of a city is to study the major cities in the society without considering any historical or accent political issues. Under this circumstance, if one person gives an adverse opinion , he may cause some conflicts during the discussion .  Nevertheless, my point of view is that for getting into a society which has sufficient agency distributed in its field we need to be more careful to consider the details while we study the major cities of the society.
        First of all, the principle that I hold for my idea is that the most significant property of a society is actually the culture which has been developing in the that society for centuries or even longer . In this case the form of its characteristics remain in the history , art , politic views , science ,religions and so on . So the big cities which have a considerable amount of area is not a neglectable component of the society and ,inversely, it is a essential entity that needs to be studied .  On the contrary , if we ignore the importance of knowing it , we may miss plenty of useful materials that can be used to identify the influence of the society especially the modern influence of the society.
        Simultaneously, my idea comes from the fact that the majors cities have not only  the quantitative reason ,like population, to be considered but also the qualitative reasons to be consider. As a consequence, we should focus on the politics and economy in the major cities which normally are the backhanded force of changing the society itself. If we take account of one modern Chinese city Shanghai , we may find that it is a striking example of leading power of China nowadays . As we may know that China which was like a closure 20 years ago has now developed so many industries based on marketing economy , we can see the change of China through this new city and conclude at least an assumption that for providing more productivity ,China may change its structure of communism . And this is the influence driven by the major city. Moreover , it also can be shown ,in some degree , Shanghai also has its economic soundness which can incites and help the inner area of china.
        Aside from the two provisos listed above , the argument of mine considers the absolute expression in the statement. As people may only focus on the major cities , they may have a tendency to just ignore the villages even small cities .  Accordingly, they may miss the old but essential part of the society including philosophy , traditions and particularly the arts. China can be perfectly exemplified also for this case . Cause China changed a lot during past 10 years , old things including merit and demerits are destructed officially but they are remained in the small cities which , unlike Shanghai , kept plenty of agency from past 5000 years.
        To sum up , the big cities are absolutely the entrance of knowing a society but the study from small places cannot be ignored  easily. We should consider the balance between these two facts so that we can find a method to perform analysis like this.

cjlingyuanUID：2876233

13# kid_gaoyuan

你写的是关于“丑闻”的这篇啊。

kid_gaoyuanUID：3085409

阿　抱歉阿　没看到你编辑了发题目的帖子，　我晚点把它改过来。