Luna6408 Daily Writing....^o^

Luna6408UID: 3140002

每日写作，从今天开始了......

Luna6408UID: 3140002

7-29独立------It is often not a good thing to move to a new city or a new country because of the lost of old friends.

One of the most important relationships between individuals is the friendship within friends. Have you ever missed the old friends living far away, which would also help you recall the happy times in your childhood. In my point of view, however, it is still worth moving to a new place under some circumstances.

Admittedly, there is no one would deny the fact that no one could live in society without friends. There are many kinds of friendships in our social life, such as between parents and children, teachers and students, contemporary friends, coworkers, and sometimes we could even make friends with people who older than us more than twenty years. At the very beginning, especially in the rapid developing modern society, nobody is capable to do everything perfectly. So we do need friends, the ones that we could learn from, we could share with , we could confide the secrets from the bottom of our hearts. Judging from this aspect, it is clearly for us to see that friends have already played an essential role in our lives and could cast great impacts on us.

However, in most cases when we need to move to a new place doesn’t mean that it is not a good thing and we will lose our old friends. Once we had come to this world, our destination demines we should carry out our ineluctable responsibilities: to pursue our dreams, to take care of our parents, to support our own family. In the sharp competitive society, if we want to find our own place in this world, many times not only we could, but we also have to move to a place which still strange to ourselves in order to looking for more opportunities of work and study. Only through this, we could better to realize our responsibilities and make our dreams come into true. There are many examples could be easily to reach. Each year, there are tens of thousands of students come from every countries to the United States for higher education. Not just only because of many top universities like MIT, Harford, Yale here, but also because through enhancing their intelligences, they could serve their countries better, earn more money to do many other things in their future life. From this, we could see that leaving from hometown could not be easily said that is a bad thing.

Moreover, the reason I think we will not lose our old friends when moving to other place and sometimes even a better choice is that we could not always stay with our old friends for 24hours per day. Obviously when we were living at our hometown is the same. There are two idioms in Chinese could express this clearly: All good things come to an end and a hedge between keeps friendship green. It means as real good friends, nothing would make them forget the other one, although they have to move to a new place and could not be surrounded by old friends. On other hand, human beings are gregarious animals, if not hermits, they could finally to find certain people as new friends and get chances to see the completely new place and many interesting stuff which they haven’t seen before. All of these could widen their knowledge horizon and making their lives more colorful. People could have more friends while not forgetting the other ones.

Further, it is probably that the speaker forget about our highly developed technologies. With the great inventions in these centuries, cell phone, email, and instant communication tools like MSN, ICQ have greatly shorten the distances among people, and make the whole world more and more becoming “a global village”.  Therefore, it is not a big problem to talk with your friends who live thousands of kilometers far away any more. Take my best friend Monica as an instance, right now she is a student study at A&M. Although I live in China a small city, we talk to each other frequently through computers and we could see each other via webcam. It is so convenient as we feel both us still live in the same dorm as we used to in the high school.

To sum up, we could not ignore the fact that we would lose some interaction with our old friends some time, however, it is incredible to say that it is not a good thing to move to a new place when having our own responsibility, meeting new friends and with high developing communication tools talking to old friends.

Luna6408UID: 3140002

7-29 TPO17综合-----
In this lecture, the speaker focuses on urban development providing better and larger habitats, using various crops promoting productivity, and designing genetic pest-resist crops could maintain the population of birds, which are challenging the contents stated in the reading passage.

To begin with, the lecturer claims that due to extensive settlements, although the population of some species of birds in deed shrinked,  while others are actually increased. This rejects the point in the reading passage that because of the need to meet the expansion of human population, most suitable places for bird living are now encroaching by human, which led to the decreasing of the population of birds. From the lecturer, however, she points out the fact that some species birds may not adapted to the changes, but some other types of birds could increase the number by the larger and better habitats, like more wild animals could be seen when they are praying the increasing population of rodents and pigeons.

In addition, the lecturer goes on to discuss the issue that it is not convincing to say that the growing agricultural activities may destruct the birds' habitats, which also conflict with the point supporting by the writer that the size of population of birds would be continue smaller by means of converting wilderness areas for agricultural use. In accordance with the lecturer, right now in America, they use various crops, which could increase the productivity per field, to avoid utilizing wild areas for farming.

Furthermore, the lecturer also oppose to the writer's expectation by emphasizing that birds eating insects would not being killed. On the contrary to the same problem, the writer in the passage points that by widely using chemical pesticides, the insects would be toxic and water would be polluted, then birds would died for eating these poisoned stuff. The lecturer shows, however, the writer fall to see the trends of developing new, less toxic pesticide and designing genetic pest-resist crops, both of which would effectively reduce the number of poisoned pests.

To sum up, all of the evidence of the lecturer illustrates that she disagree with the points mentioned in the reading material.

Luna6408UID: 3140002

7-30独立-----A teacher who is serious and strict is more efficient than a teacher who uses humor and who is easygoing.

“A good teacher is like a candle, it consumes itself and light the way for others”.
Accompanying with the increasing attention on education, there is a controversial topic among people in these decades. That is what kind of teachers could be more efficient and more effective, the easygoing ones or the strict ones? In my point of view, however, both of them are important and each side has their own advantages and shortness under some certain circumstances.

Admittedly, there is no one would deny the fact that teachers do have great impacts on each individual’s life. And actually, there are many kinds of teachers in our lives, like our parents who nursing us, teachers who teaching us in the class, and many others who help us learn something we did not know before. Especially in the rapid developing society, each single one does not have the ability and time to recognize the world in person. How could we effectively gather all the information, from whom we could looking help for are always confused by many people? Teacher is absolutely the key to these questions. They may use their accumulated experience to help us achieve the success that we are longing for.
Judging from this, we could see that it is essential to choose the teacher who suits us best.

However, should we pay more attention to the one while ignore the other, the answer is obviously no. For one thing, teacher who has a good temper is very vital in our lives and study. For example, in China, students usually have a great burden of responsibility. In study, if the teacher could use a humorous way such as metaphor to illustrate a complicated phenomenon or explains some events in history, it will be a great help and an easy way for the students to understand. And the students could take a break under high pressure in high school when all the people are looking for high graduation rates.
Sometimes students are willing to confide to the friendly teacher and want to make friends with them. In this way, it also could help students release the pressure from work and study and then greatly improve the efficiency of study.

For the other thing, the strict and serious teachers are playing an in dependable role in many cases. There are many examples are not difficult to reach. Take a seven years old child as an example. It is a big change when he join the primary school from kindergarten, all of the surroundings are completely new, including new teachers,
new friends , and more important is that he have to work as a student, which means he could not play frivolously as usual. Most of time, it is useless to talk to an unenlightened child. However, they should be told to follow the rules of class and they might be punished once break them. Only disciplined by a strict teacher, the seven years old boy then could deeply impressed, and it will be better to construct the knowledge better for him in the future. Could you deny that such a teacher is not necessary in our study? And their value is also immeasurable.

To sum up, we could not neglect that easygoing teachers might lose disciplines and serious teachers might make some students feel depressed and even nervous some time. But generally speaking, most of the both sides’ teachers could indeed help students efficient and effectively study, in accordance with the best adaption of the students.

Luna6408UID: 3140002

7-30TPO-18综合

In this lecture, the professor contradicts the statements made in the passage. She is of the view that the three ways to address the decline of Torreya would not provide any satisfied solution. The reasons are as follows.

First of all, the lecturer points out that reestablishing Torreya in the same location in unlikely to be successful. Because global climate had a great impact on the coolest and wettest areas, therefore the relative small area of microclimate were strongly influenced by the changes of climate of surrounding large regions. It could be global warming which has been increasing
the temperatures of overall the areas or the trends crossed northern Florida have drained. Either way makes the same location fail to provide the necessary microclimate in which Torreya could survive.

Second, the professor continues to oppose to the second solution that relocating Torreya to the place far from where Torreya currently grows is also unconvincing. She takes locating black locus trees to a new enviroment as an example. After people did this, the black locus trees spread so quickly and killed many species of local trees and plants. Most of these trees and plants were then endangered and becoming extinct. The professor then concludes that the result of emigrating Torreya to a new area is unpredictable.

Finally, the lecturer persuades us that the last point supported by the writer in the reading passage is unreliable. Since the population of Torreya that can be captained in research center is limited, so they probably could not resist disease there. Because only by a large population, then Torreya could devise a genetic system to against disease. Wild areas could provide the conditions necessarily needed by Torreya, while research centers are not able to help Torreya resist disease and survive in long term.

To sum up, the lecturer disagrees with the points mentioned in the reading material. These solutions are not effective ways to deal with the problem that causing the decrease of Torreya.

wilsonchen2011UID: 3137568

3# Luna6408

wilsonchen2011UID: 3137568

2# Luna6408

师走99UID: 2857041

7.29的独立
太晚了，不好意思啊~

theflyfishUID: 2101420

改好了

liuqianru2UID: 3112323

In this lecture, the professor contradicts the statements made in the passage. She is of the view that the three ways to address the decline of Torreya would not provide any satisfied solution. The reasons are as follows.4 T1 y7 X- a) y5 }( u4 l# A

First of all, the lecturer points out that reestablishing Torreya in the same location in unlikely to be successful. Because global climate had a great impact on the coolest and wettest areas, (coolest and wettest area就在microclimate里，不是属于large region的)therefore the relative small area of microclimate were strongly influenced by the changes of climate of surrounding large regions. It could be global warming which has been increasing
the temperatures of overall the areas or the trends crossed northern Florida have drained.（主谓不搭，trends drained?） Either way(说both比较好，而且用way比较奇怪) makes the same location fail to provide the necessary microclimate in which Torreya could survive.( f% J$ n* v; w/ `6 e* c, b

Second, the professor continues to oppose to the second solution that relocating Torreya to the place far from where Torreya currently grows is also unconvincing.（句子不对啊，oppose to solution..is unconvincing.建议：去掉is also unconvincing 或oppose to改为states）She takes locating black locus trees to a new environment as an example. After people did this, the black locus trees spread so quickly and killed many species of local trees and plants. Most of these trees and plants were then endangered (本身就endanger,不用then)and becoming extinct. The professor then concludes that the result of emigrating Torreya to a new area is unpredictable., \5 F( ~+ |8 w1 Z8 C+ |

Finally, the lecturer persuades us that the last point supported by the writer in the reading passage is unreliable. Since the population of Torreya that can be captained in research center is limited, so they probably could not resist disease there. Because only by a large population, then Torreya could devise(设计？) a genetic system to against disease. Wild areas could provide the conditions necessarily needed by Torreya, while research centers are not able to help Torreya resist disease and survive in long term.

To sum up, the lecturer disagrees with the points mentioned in the reading material. These solutions are not effective ways to deal with the problem that causing （cause）the decrease of Torreya.

april0515UID: 2997208

4# Luna6408
改好啦~~~ April 改 Luna6408 独立 7.30.doc (43.5 KB, 下载次数: 11)

2011-7-31 12:19:46 上传

下载次数: 11

  欢迎来改我的作文~