关于新G ARGU79的疑问。。。。

小乐乐娘子UID: 3135273

题目内容：
“Since those issues of Newsbeat magazine that featured political news on their front cover were the poorest-selling issues over the past three years, the publisher of Newsbeat has recommended that the magazine curtail its emphasis on politics to focus more exclusively on economics and personal finance. She points to a recent survey of readers of general interest magazines that indicates greater reader interest in economic issues than in political ones. Newsbeat's editor, however, opposes the proposed shift in editorial policy, pointing out that very few magazines offer extensive political coverage anymore.”

Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

文中publisher和editor的意见相悖，题目要求评判recommendation，但是我就糊涂了。。这个recommendation是指publisher的还是指editor的？
如果是指publisher的，那么editor的观点是应该反驳。。？还是应该怎么着呢 。。？

fangziboy01UID: 3006756

我也迷惑呢，不知道后面加这一句话意图是什么，求解答，帮顶

liuyan_adamsUID: 2656072

同问！

liuyan_adamsUID: 2656072

最后一句very few magazines offer extensive political coverage anymore.什么意思？搞不懂……求解释……

nothintoloseUID: 2993399

个人看法
这题的recommendation是publisher的建议，也就是要单独多报道经济相关新闻
至于editor的意见，可以作为攻击的论据之一

phoebeyhxjUID: 3094634

同问 到底攻击谁呢

dkzmqUID: 3116032

木有好心人解答一下么？我们到底要argue什么呢

athshgwUID: 2959616

我也迷惑ing

咖啡盐UID: 2973669

here's my point of view

https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1295060-1-1.html

zwyf25UID: 3171366

9# 咖啡盐

版主你好，我觉得这类题目在新G中还是占到一定比重的，74题也是这样。

我觉得应该关注一下INSTRUCTION
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

很明显这个题目出现了两个观点，且各自有理由（74题也是这样）。
版主的一句话很对，ARGUMENT最终还是要得出结论的，可这不代表我们一定要表现出支持或否定谁。
以往的题目只有一个观点，那我们攻击了半天自然最后的结论就是你是有问题的，想要判断你对不对，你需要BALABALA。。。
现在文中有了两个观点，我们当然是要都攻击，结论就是你俩都有问题，想要决定谁对需要BALABALA。。。

毕竟，ARGUMENT是要你分析文中的结论、建议是否合理，我们是通过找逻辑漏洞来评估它的结论、建议出现了怎样的问题，而不在于你支持什么观点。

个人意见，恳请赐教，10月份就要考了，没底啊呵呵。