考前第一篇综合写作，我承认我用模板了，但是语法等错误…求狠批

苇叶笛声UID: 2876158

TPO16

Casting doubt the viewpoint of the writer who composes the passage--the viewpoint that the science of archaeology in the United Kingdom is facing serious problems and limitations, the lecturer, nevertheless, hold the opposite point of view concerning that the environment is better for its development after new guidelines have been adopted. To enhance his idea, the speaker then giving three reasons about the new guidelines, with each refuting the writer's argument.



To begin with, the writer gives the argument that many artifacts were lost to construction projects, which is the major objects studied by the archaeology. Ironically, the professor hold the reverse opinion. She points out that the new guide have made it clear that whenever a artifacts is going to be reconstructed, the government and the a archaeologist will exam them and assess whether they have values to be preserved. If their values are identified, special groups consisting of specialists and the constructing company will take the response to protect and restore them. In this way, the first argument of the writer is unwarranted.



Subsequently, the writer tries to persuade us by telling that the financial from the government have decreased a lot, which is harmful to the survival of archaeology. The listening material, nonetheless, highlights its drawbacks by showing that another important resource of funding has been ruled by the new guideline. Once the artifact is thought to be valuable, the construction company will be regulated to provide money for the restore and study of it.  As a result, we can conclude that financial problem will not be the barrier to the development of the subject.



Besides these, the last reason given by the author pales in comparison to that in the lecture. The guideline has formulated that more and more work chances will be provided for archaeologists. And with so many artifacts and valuable objects to be studied, the number of the professional archaeologists has been the highest nowadays.



In a nutshell, as a professor contrasting the opinion of the passage, the speaker successfully rule out the possibilities of problems that will be the obstacles of archaeology.

lighting_upUID: 2861908

这个无非考细节吧。。。感觉第三点没写够啊，我今天写的，记得好像有那个工作举例吧，好比data reporter什么的。。。

苇叶笛声UID: 2876158

3# lighting_up
其实……细节不是问题，我主要是想请高手帮找下文法，表达等的错误，毕竟这模板得用到最终考试中啊~~

苇叶笛声UID: 2876158

2# ifnoword
谢谢提醒啊，27号就要考试，时间短，就不参加了啊~