求ISSUE 108的提纲

sallyzywhappyUID: 3139283

大家集思广益下呢，本人思维有点枯竭，没想到比较深刻的idea。正方两方面的论点都需要哈，拜托了~

108. Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
    批判性的判断在任何领域当中都是没什么用处的，除非判断来自于该领域专家。

fruitkiwiUID: 3132319

1. consider the climate change, if it is come from a business, certainly it is a lie, only when it come from scientist,then people will believe it

2. in science , we trust fact. our politician say" nuclear atom is our survivor", but nobody think it is correct,unless it is proved by experiement of physicst.

暂时到这里，让我再想想。

shinian1987UID: 2797009

Outline:
1): In general, experts are experienced and have a complete knowledge system in their professions. They can understand the problems deeply. They can consider some problems with more comprehensive perspectives.
For example: economic field, water conservation
Normal people often care about their own benefits. We often hear the discussions about the housing price. To normal people, they apparently hope that the lower housing price is better. On the other hand, the real estates hope the housing price can become higher. In fact, in order to set a reasonable housing price, the experts also need to consider other factors, such as the other industries’ benefits.
Some water conservations often make some residents leave their homeland. In their opinion, all the water conservations are not worth. The experts have to balance the lost and benefits.
2): However, some experts’ critical judgments are not always right; sometimes, their decisions even lead to disastrous results.
Foe example: Three Gorges Projects, Beijing Old city reconstruction            
2): What’s more, not all the critical judgments made by the experts are better than the normal people. In the service industry, such as food industry, fashion industry, the normal customers’ opinions are more valuable.

仅供参考