- -作文贴。

koviUID: 3154928

14# houyulin

不好意思,那天有点事,后来就忘了补上了.

koviUID: 3154928

tpo 15综合!!!!

The reading passage supported that they found three ways of use to decrease the population of cane toads. However, the professor opposed that one by one. In his opinion, he considered they were unsuccessful, even a kind of environmental damage.

To begin with, the lecture suggested they should build up a natural fence to stop the moving of cane toads, which just liked what they used to deal with the over-population of rabbits in Australia. On the contrary, the professor considered the same solution to cane toad would not achieve a success. Since the spread of young cone toads or their eggs was to flow through the streams as well as rivers, they would be taken into unexpected sides easily. That meant, the fence was failed to control the growing region.

On the other side, the lecture claimed that they could encourage more volunteers to help us catch and destroy therm. But the professor pointed out that these untrained volunteers would destroy not only cane toads, but native frogs. The reason is that it was hard to indentify the toads between the frogs especially when they were young.

The last but not least, the reading passage thought a new disease-causing virus would achieve great effects on reducing the number of frogs. Nevertheless, the professor claimed that the virus would make a terrible harm in south of American. He gave us an example, since the reptiles and amphibians collected by the researchers or pet collectors would be brought into America, this virus- carried by these animals would easily kill plenty of toads in America. In this way, it would lead to a terrible damage in its local ecosystem.

boluhahaUID: 3183032

a so good

koviUID: 3154928

10.18独立!!!!!!

20100130NA Do you agree that the government should support the scientific research even there’s no practical use?


  Some people claim that it is necessary for government to invest lots of money to a scientific research without any practical benefits, since it may bring some unexpected advantages to us. However, from my perspective, it is not only a waste of time and money, but also a lie. And I will elaborate my points as following.

  First of all, let us focus on whether these kinds of research are meaningful or worthy for government to support. As we all know, the goal of developing scientific technology is to improve the life of humans. For example, the invention of TV or computers is to satisfy people’s need of entertainment, the invention of electricity is to enable people work or study at night, and the invention of air-conditions is to cool people in a hot summer. In these cases, since each of them has direct practical benefits for human, scientists try to invent them.

  And even though the government decides to support the scientific research without any practical uses, it will still meet lots of difficulties from the public and the society. Such as, the public will not allow the government to spend lots of money on something, which can not bring them practical benefits. Thus, they will try to do some parades or supporting other factions in the next national election in order to prevent this policy.

  Besides, if the government really wants to develop the country, they can do many other things instead of relay on the scientific research, which has not practical values. For example, they can build more schools, improve the equipments of schools, invent latest and powerful weapons to elevate military strength of the country, and research more efficient strain of crops. All of these can engender great influence on the education, military affairs and starvation directly.

  In conclusion, according to what I mentioned above, to spend lots of money on this kind of research is hopeless and meaningless. Thus, the government should make a full use of this money on other sides, which may eventually brings more benefits or hopes to the society.

香草鱼UID: 3125484

10月18日 作文修改
1018 kovi(Kovi).doc (23 KB, 下载次数: 3)

2011-10-19 23:13:00 上传

下载次数: 3

alohasallyUID: 2860276

我本来是修改你的tpo14  好像你写了tpo15，  

The reading passage supported that they found three ways of use to decrease the population of cane toads. However, the professor opposed that one by one. In his opinion, he considered they were unsuccessful, even a kind of environmental damage.9 z/ k+ r1 ]* y. e% v6 J  q
: g# I3 _1 \; ?. N: N" F# a, p+ R
To begin with, the lecture suggested they should build up a natural fence to stop the moving of cane toads, which just liked what they used to deal with the over-population of rabbits in Australia. On the contrary, the professor considered the same solution to cane toad would not achieve a success. 合并一句Since the spread of young cone toads or their eggs was to flow through the streams as well as rivers, they would be taken into unexpected sides easily. That meant 可能有点口语 According to this, the fence was failed to control the growing region. + S: L5 n9 K. p7 B& B! c6 _$ }& i
' T. Z0 N  p/ i8 h7 y- @0 G2 J
On the other side记得老师说这个词组前面要和 on the one side 搭配, the lecture claimed that they could encourage more volunteers to help us catch and destroy therm. But the professor pointed out that these untrained volunteers would destroy not only cane toads, but native frogs. The reason is that it was hard to indentify the toads between the frogs especially when they were young.4 F( s  q, v8 r0 J( W
+ W7 t4 ?+ ^( J: t( ~% m! o$ `- y
The last but not least, the reading passage thought a new disease-causing virus would achieve great effects on reducing the number of frogs. Nevertheless, the professor claimed that the virus would make a terrible harm in south of American. He gave us an example, since the reptiles and amphibians collected by the researchers or pet collectors would be brought into America, this virus- carried by these animals would easily kill plenty of toads in America. In this way, it would lead to a terrible damage in its local ecosystem

结构挺不错了
我的10-18 作文地址是 https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1309617-4-1.html

koviUID: 3154928

- -10.19.综合.tpo16

The professor explained three aspects of new rules, each of which has successfully addressed the problems mentioned in the reading passage concerning lost of valuable artifacts, less of economical support and a steady and suitable enough income.

  First, the professor pointed out the new rule would allow archaeologists to examine the places before the constructions. If these places cause the interest of archeologists or showed valuable, the archaeologists can make a point with local government, such as building around, or excavating firstly. This measure has proven very effective in addressing the first problem mentioned in the reading- artifacts are mainly destroying by construction projects.

  Second, the lecturer explained that according to new rules, the expense, including of doing pre-examinations and doing the research, should be paid by the construction company instead of the government. In this way, it will help archeologists do a research in a larger range than before. As a result of this, the second problem highlighted in the reading passage concerning economical support has been significantly solved.

  The professor's last point concerned the final problem raised in the reading material- it's hard to make a living on taking up archaeology. She argued that British government had provided a lot of paid work, which did not exist before. Besides, it also set up the observation to help people do research, profess scientific manner, and eventually learn to write reports and articles.

jackieydanUID: 3182030

Kivo .木有找到你19號的獨立啊。。。
這是我作文的網址，來批改吧！https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1309557-2-1.html

xiangtuoUID: 3047550

10月20号的独立呢？