- 最后登录
- 2009-10-9
- 在线时间
- 3 小时
- 寄托币
- 519
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2003-5-22
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 378
- UID
- 135321
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 519
- 注册时间
- 2003-5-22
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
发表于 2003-8-31 23:16:13
|显示全部楼层
170 "The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but the general welfare of all its people." 7
Does the surest indicator of a great nation is the not the achievements of its elites, say the political leaders, artists, or scientists, etc. but the general welfare of its people, as the speaker asserts?(feier 你的问句我觉得怪怪的说…What is the surest indicator of a great nation? Is it the general welfare of all its people but the achievements of its elites say the….as the speaker asserts? 个人意见啰) Insofar as I think, the two facets are not mutually exclusive, what the achievements of the elites means is just the welfare of the people.
How to define the greatness of a nation? Undoubtedly, the achievements of its politicians, artists, and scientists can best determine whether a nation is progress or retrograde and at what degree it arrives. When people trace back the important historical improvement or comment on today's the development of a nation, they often resort to those who are representative and prompting ones for the reason that the roles they played are irreplaceable in such processes. For instance, many outstanding scientists in Industry Revolution were regarded as the main strength that brought the (不要the)today’s ever-growing scientific and technological advances. And the artists in the Renaissance, such as Vince, Michelangelo etc., were the forerunners of some artistic schools, many of their artworks were today’s classics that constitute the important part of cultural legacies through which a nation defines its cultural identity. Still, who makes China marching on an ever-growing road? The first man that emerges in people's mind is Deng Xiaoping, the designer and the operator of the market economy and opening-up policies. By the same token, when talking about the today’s advanced economic situations that American achieved, the contributions of Clinton and Bush can not(cannot喔…扣分:)) be denied.
However, the speaker fails to define the “general welfare” and mistakenly think(plus s) that the achievements of elites have nothing to do with people’s well-being. Actually, the achievements of the elites can not be separated with the welfare of their people, or else, what they did can not be called(how about respected?) as achievements at all. The former Soviet Union is just an apt case in point. The rulers of that time blindly developed overwhelming military strength which made their nation’s martial level arrive at the top throughout the world. Nonetheless, most of their citizens live in an inferior life, and even can not address the basic survival problems, does this so-called contribution was worth commending and therefore called as achievements? Definitely not. Otherwise, on no account do scientists make great achievements when they invent nuclear weapons which are applied to destroy people themselves and when they clone people themselves by using of the genetic technology.
Actually, the responsibilities of those elites should aim at improving the welfare of all the people in a nation. Only shouldering these duties can what they do can be defined as achievements, which will be the surest indicator of the greatness of a nation. For the rulers or the politicians, they should improve people's living standards, safeguard the nation's integrity and people's safety, in a word, they should make their nation more stable, peace, and prosperous; With respect to artists, they should exert their creativity and imagination to make more classic artworks in order to reflect the inner connotations and impulse of a society and ultimately improve people’s spiritual life and bring with them entertainment; When it comes to scientists, what they should is to make the research results conduce to people’s study, life, and work while avoid the potential negative impacts their research may produce. If so, the greatness, stability and the prosperity of nation is only the expected thing.
In summary, the surest indicator of a great nation is the achievements of its elites, and is boiled down to the welfare of its people. The two things are organic whole, general welfare is the end goal and primary purpose of individual achievements. (感觉第三段也需要类似这句来作为清楚的T.S.)Without considering the well-being of people, what elites do can not be labeled as achievements.
feier加油啊…放轻松…一定可以的….
祝好运 :D |
|