【daily writing】 飞龙在天写作贴

毛小龙UID: 3283088

TPO23
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays, it was no rarely to see
that we have the choice that whether we should work quickly and risk making mistakes or work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. The world is changing in drastic speed, and we have more and more work to do, requiring more and more efficient. Everyone might make mistakes and we never make sure everything is all right. And we need to collaborate to look over each other to avoid one's person big mistakes. So I certainly agree with the statement that working quickly and risk making mistakes is much more important after considering the following factors.

The decisive factor is that to work quickly and risk making mistakes apparently benefits for people to do work more efficiently and more creatively. That means if we work quickly and risk making mistakes, we will dare to make creative ideas, and at the same time we will also try as many as possible, both of which absolutely contribute to great and creative works. As we know, many great work
in the human history came from the thought of risking making
mistakes, for example, Edison who work efficiently and risk making mistakes have eventually invent the bulb after thousands of failures .So we can draw conclusion that to work quickly and risk making mistakes is considerably important.

Besides, it is one part of collaboration of group works. With the rapid development of society and increasing drastic competition, we would find that to work quickly and risk making mistakes is necessary and crucial to compete for one position. Moreover, in group works, we cooperate with each other and make correction and gain improvement each one, but it will be catastrophic to let others wait our works. Imagine when we do work with our patterns,
we
would certainly prefer to work efficiently and risking mistakes rather than much better work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.


In conclusion, despite the fact that work slowly and make sure that everything is correct may have some minor advantages ,such as need less correction, when take the view to scan the whole picture, to work quickly and risk making mistakes is absolutely much more efficient ,more creative and of course, more important.

idealibtUID: 2667256

3.28.doc (37.5 KB, 下载次数: 7)

2012-3-29 19:42:07 上传

下载次数: 7

综合的等你消息

修改稿纯属个人意见，供参考

毛小龙UID: 3283088

Tpo23树的灭绝


The lecture shows that the reason for declining the yellow cedar is unknown and debates the three main hypotheses given in the reading passage.

The first hypothesis attributes the decline to  the insect parasite, specifically the cedar bark beetle, The professor, in contrast, points that the tree is more resistant for the beetle than another tree and the other tree have not been damaged, how could this tree for killed by the yellow cedars. So it’s not a reasonable cause.

Another hypothesis in the reading material is that brow bears maybe the reason for the yellow cedar decline, but the listening presents a conflicting fact that there are no bears in the island and the population of yellow trees growing in the island is also declined. So the hypothesis could not explain the fact.

Finally, the professor states that the trees living in warm high equitation is more damaged than those living in cold low equitation, which challenges the third hypothesis which says that the sensitive frozen root caused by climate change is to be blamed for the decline. Therefore the hypothesis cannot be reasonable.

In general, the professor casts doubt the three hypotheses given by the reading passage and explain the reasons in detail.

坏绿的眼睛UID: 3138294

棕色是困惑  紫色是精彩  红色是添加修改删除

+ ]  y0 H' ?6 X) @! g
Nowadays 这个词最好别在开头用 太多中国学生拿它开头了= =, it was no rarely to see that we have the choice that whether we should work quickly and risk making mistakes or work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. The world is changing in drastic speed, and we have more and more work to do, requiring more and more efficient. Everyone might make mistakes and we never make sure everything is all right. And we need to collaborate 提到合作的用意是什么？ to look over each other to avoid one's person big mistakes. So I certainly agree with 不知道能不能这样用 the statement that working quickly and risk making mistakes is much more important after considering the following factors.

: w  I' Z: }8 D  P
. d( ^& S6 O; h# O/ Q: a9 D
The decisive factor is that to work quickly and risk making mistakes apparently benefits for people to do work more efficiently and more creatively. That means if we work quickly and risk making mistakes, we will dare to make creative ideas, and at the same time we will also try as many as possible, both of which absolutely contribute to great and creative works. As we know, many great work6 U% e7 e7 m1 e& J- L% V in the human history came from the thought of risking makingmistakes, for example, Edison who work efficiently and risk making mistakes have eventually invent the bulb after thousands of failures .So we can draw conclusion that to work quickly and risk making mistakes is considerably important.你这个例子特别特别好！

% J! @4 G; `% J. q+ N' I: l
Besides, it is one part of collaboration of group works. With the rapid development of society and increasing drastic competition, we would find that to work quickly and risk making mistakes is necessary and crucial to compete for one position. Moreover, in group works, we cooperate with each other and make correction and gain improvement each one, but it will be catastrophic to let others wait our works. Imagine when we do work with our patterns,we7 [  H5 o3 ^2 y, u! ]) ~ would certainly prefer to work efficiently and risking mistakes rather than much better 这。。样用可以吗 我语法不是很好 不确定 work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.还是那句话~要多换几种说法 别让考官觉得你词汇量少= =" Z5 l* o8 D( _, j3 h, s  P

  D+ D0 \* {  z4 v6 b; c. {
In conclusion, despite the fact that work slowly and make sure that everything is correct may have some minor advantages ,such as need less correction, when take the view to scan the whole picture,又学到一句 呵呵 to work quickly and risk making mistakes觉得你可以多换几种说法 is absolutely much more efficient ,more creative and of course, more important.

秋雨荆州UID: 2903781

已改 3# 毛小龙

坏绿的眼睛UID: 3138294

Tpo23树的灭绝; b  L, C. T( m5 z
棕色是困惑  紫色是精彩  红色是添加修改删除

The lecture shows that the reasonS for declining of the yellow cedar is unknown？？？教授没说unknown吧？。。应该只是没有提到 不能直接就说Unknown吧？ and debates the three main hypotheses 用假设合适吗？given in the reading passage. - ~4 b! \. N( B; g
" F- J1 u0 Q! v6 J) u
The first hypothesis attributes the decline to  the insect parasite, specifically the cedar bark beetle,这句好 我就忘记点出听出的例子了 The professor, in contrast, points that the tree is more resistant for the beetle than another tree and the other tree have not been damaged, how could this tree for killed by the yellow cedars. So it’s not a reasonable cause.1 O6 I, O' Y7 B4 m
* M) I* c3 Q& F8 {( }2 a
Another hypothesis in the reading material is that brow bears maybe the reason for the yellow cedar decline,
but 这个应该不是转折的关系吧？？the listening presents a conflicting fact that 这个用法我也很少用 学到了呵呵 there are no bears in the island and the population of yellow trees growing in the island is also declined. So the hypothesis could not explain the fact.. i( W$ ^3 a/ ?8 Q) c0 t6 P3 }; o9 H
# F$ H) p0 r5 M6 G) d% q! y
Finally, the professor states that the trees living in warm high equitation is more damaged than those living in cold low equitation, which challenges the third hypothesis which says that the sensitive frozen root caused by climate change is to be blamed for the decline. Therefore the hypothesis cannot be reasonable.% [! s$ Q# ?) Y6 l+ F$ s9 m' g7 ?# P
. S+ f4 W# A$ o+ b
In general, the professor casts doubt the three hypotheses given by the reading passage and explain the reasons in detail.收尾句很好~


要点都抓住了~写得也很流畅 羡慕哇~~加油

毛小龙UID: 3283088

In the reading passage the writer says that the Ethanol fuel is not a good replacement for 3main reasons, but the professor does not agree with it and refutes the main points in detail.

Firstly, according the passage, the ethanol fuel is also burned into carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse gas which causes the global warming. However, the professor points out that although the ethanol fuel produce the green gas ,but it do not add the amounts of the green gas because that it just remove the gas in the plants which would
also release the gas when it was decayed.

Secondly, the passage asserts that it will certainly reduce the amounts of plants available for food use, which mean more corn which used to be food for animal are used to produce ethanol. The professor points out the fact that the ethanol fuel the part of the corns which cannot be eaten by animals , so there is absolutely no reduction for animal food.

Thirdly, the professor explain that when the ethanol fuel is used more widely and have a larger mounts production, the price will be cut down drastically and then, of course, can compete with the gasoline on price even without the subsidies from the government , which have convert the idea in the passage saying the \ price of the ethanol fuel will never be no competitive.

毛小龙UID: 3283088

上面的综合写作  tpO 22 ____3-29

毛小龙UID: 3283088

tpo 22: 是否同意这个观点： 老师不应该在课上讲社会或者政治观点？？

Teachers, playing a significantly important role on the physical and psychological development of students, are the life guide for the students, especially for young children. However, from my perspective, their social or political views are so private and sensitive that it would be much better for them to keep in their own hearts rather than present it in the classroom. I will demonstrate it as below.

On one hand, social and political views are private views and have little benefits for students. Teachers should pay more attention to the education rather than share private views in the public, especially in the classroom. As we known, teachers are also normal people and the social view may be not positive or suitable for other peoples. So imagine if a negative teacher presents the social view to the students, how a serious influence it will bring to the students. What's more, everyone have the freedom to owe their own social views and respect their own religions.
Therefore, to talk about social views in the classroom is not only to waste time which should be spent on the knowledge teaching
but also to put the negative influence on the freedom of
students' social views.

On the other hand, political views are so sensitive and may also make themselves involved in the trouble. For instance, in some countries, the political problems is prevented from talking in the class, and if a teacher may involve some political problems and send may himself into the prison. And even when it was freedom for teachers to talk about political problems, it may also lead some students who disagree with the opinions of the teacher to hate them. Therefore, it’s absolutely a good choice for teachers themselves to avoid sharing political view.

In conclusion, we can certainly claim that social or political views should not be presented by teachers in the classroom for it brings no advantage for both teachers themselves and students.

毛小龙UID: 3283088

非常感激的你的认真修改和很好的建议，谢谢啦 5# 秋雨荆州