【Daily Writting 作文特训小组】carl作业

秋雨荆州UID：2903781

timicao 发表于 2012-6-21 11:39
美好的一天，又来贴作文了，大家来拍啊。写的慢伤不起啊，这篇写了将近一个半小时。。。
When a new techn ...

timicaoUID：3131283

6.22作业贴
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's more important for the government to build new housing than preserve old and historical building.  Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Do you agree or disagree?


When it comes to the question whether it is more important for a goverment to build new housing then preserve its the historical building, there are a host of different ideas held by different people in various fields. Some people may claim that building new building is of more significant then preserving these old buildings. However, as far as I am concerned that preserve old building is also deserve our attention and maybe play a even more remarkable role then buiding new houses does in this modern society.
Addimittedly, with the remitting increasing of population, a lot of new houses is needed to meet this growing trend. And they also maitain that old buiding just contibute nothing positive to the development of a nation. So they suggest we should tear all these old building down so that we can build more new houses.
Even though the historical building can not promote the development rate of a nation, they need to be preserved since they maintain great value in culture sustaining and history recognition. The historic building is a symbol of a country's culture and history. So destorying the historical building partly means abandoning the cuntral and history of a nation. Though you might say history can be written down and cuntral can be passed by, these reserved architecture are vivid and concrete . The history building has not only values of culture and history, but a statue through which we can distinguish our country with others. In this rapidly changing society caused by globalization, if a coutry destroying all its historical building, at last, it will lose all its distinction, then can it still be a unique country.
The historical building also has something to do with education. First,it can serve as a reminder of our history. A typical example is us, the young generation, who have not gone through the history of that period related to the historical building, can have a vivid knowledge through visiting the historical building since history book is abstract and sometimes makes us boring. Also the historical building has some aesthetic beauties through which we can learn a sense of charming. For instance, if Beijing has put all these old architectures down, where can we still enjoy these unique palaces and temples, how can our next generation to appreciate these wonderful wonders.

Fom what discussed above, I can safely draw the conclusion that the advantages of preserving the historical buliding far outweigh these slightly merits of building new houses.

timicaoUID：3131283

6--21作业贴
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:the car has had greater effect
To society than the airplane has to.

The rapidly development of economic and modern society has sparked a lot of inventions which make us wealthy and ameliorate a great deal of our living standards. Car and plane are just two of millions of inventions, which contribute a lot to our modern lives. When it comes to the question does car play a more significant role to society than plane, there must be a host of different ideas held by different people in various fields. As for me, I can not agree more with this issue.

Firs of all, car is easy accessible than plane. Nowadays, car has became a indispensable mean of transportation, and we may use it almost everyday, wether driving it you own or take a taxi. For instance, we can drive car to walk; we can drive car to travel; we can also drive car to relax. Unlike the car, we can not depend on plane to do all of these things since plane is less accessible than car is. Nowadays with our living standard's improving we can afford a car, while few people can afford to own a plane. Meanwhile, cars are just everywhere crowed on the streets, while plane may not so widely appear. For example, if we need to take a car, just wave your hand or make a call. That is so simple and easy. However, taking a plane is just not so simple. We have to book a ticket in advance and undergo a complicated procedures before we get in a plane.

In addition, the car not only provides remarkably convenience to our life, but makes our daily life more comfortable and enjoyable. A apt illustration involves the traveling. When we travel by car, we can enjoy the beauties all along our way to the destination which bring a great feast to our eyes and, at the same time, it can reduce our tired and relax our mind. But if your choose plane as your mean, how can you know countless beauties just exist in the road, which may attract you more and impress you deeper than the destination alone.

Admittedly, when you go abroad or want to a place where car can not reach, then you can and you have to turn to planes since plane is capable of getting these palces. Moreover, plane can save us a lot of time especially when you are in a harry. But we all know, plane can become a must only on these conditions. Car have alreadly penetrated into our every daily life. For example, short distance tour you can only count on car because plane is unavailable.

Just as listed above, it is car that has many merit and influences almost in every aspect, so I reckon compared with plane the car has more effect on the society.

zypxfklUID：3212200

楼主过目

meanttobeUID：3152632

楼主你也是7，14考么？

timicaoUID：3131283

meanttobe 发表于 2012-6-22 19:12
楼主你也是7，14考么？

7--15