- 最后登录
- 2024-8-22
- 在线时间
- 12859 小时
- 寄托币
- 112852
- 声望
- 8090
- 注册时间
- 2010-9-11
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 31910
- 精华
- 41
- 积分
- 105460
- UID
- 2903781
- 声望
- 8090
- 寄托币
- 112852
- 注册时间
- 2010-9-11
- 精华
- 41
- 帖子
- 31910
|
本帖最后由 秋雨荆州 于 2013-2-2 21:06 编辑
Some people believe that people should follow their ambitious dreams and goals even they are not realistic, others believe that people should focus on achieving realistic goals.
ID:idealguai
People now tend to refer to various dreams according to the possibility of dreams coming true, that is to say, dreams can be easily divided into two simple extreme categories: realistic ones and unrealistic ones. As life is only once for each individual, how to spend the life-time becomes a primary problem. Should people solely focus on achieving realistic goals or chasing ambitious ones no matter whether they are realistic or not? As far as I am concerned, I strongly support the idea of chasing the ambitious dreams even they are unrealistic because dreams offer us energy to do everything with enthusiasm, those unrealistic but ambitious ones are not realistic at the moment rather than forever, and merely concentrating on realistic ones may kill not only creative ideas but also ambitions which might lead to the suspend of technology progress and social development.
Ambitious dreams provide people with great motive and considerable impetus. Take John Nash, the founder of the theory of Nash equilibrium, for example, he is a famous mathematical genius and devote all his life on the dream of academic achievements which seemed rather unrealistic in his research field decades ago. Thanks to Nash's persistence, the theory of Nash equilibrium became well-accepted ultimately, and it has been and surely will go on playing an important role in numerous areas in both theory and application. What's more, as it is true for all scientific research areas, without those persistent dreams and seemingly crazy ideas, there would never be so much cutting-edge technology and all kinds of modern electronic products. Chasing the dream makes people full of limitless energy and great passion and drives them to be successful.
In addition, the definition of unrealistic is restricted by social development. Goals unrealistic now, to a large extent, might be realistic in the foreseeable future and this true fact should attract full attention. For example, for those living decades ago, it was totally impossible to command the cell phone just by sound; computers with no keyboards were incredible as well, not to mention the idea of operating computers and cell phone by fingers on the screen. However, we can simply realize all of them by iphone 4S and similar smart electronic goods today. Dreams may be unrealistic for a short period of time but, to a large extent, be realistic in the near future. Whether dreams are realistic or not should not be the obstruction that affect aspiring individuals.
Finally but not the least, merely focusing on realistic dreams may impose restrictions on creative mind which is an critical prerequisite factor of technology progress and social development. As human brain possesses unlimited potential, without the drive of ambitious but unrealistic dreams, one day may come when the pace of human society development dramatically slow down.
In short, thanks to the ambitions of those beautiful minds like that of Nash, aspiring people, full of motivation, can exert themselves to realize great dreams leading to both scientific and social development
优文简析:
Development:
相比大众一点的三方面找理由,这篇文章的优点是三个段落论证很流畅。
1. Unrealistic dreams prompts techs and science.
2. Unrealistic dreams turns realistic in foreseeable future.
3. Merely focus on realistic dreams poses restriction on human creativity.
当一个题目拿出来的时候,往往大部分人能找到1、3两点,不过第二点相对比较隐蔽,作者的转化很到位。矛盾的两方面得到了转换,连接了两者,于是realistic和unrealistic之间有了逻辑上的关联,这时候抛出第三点,也不用再大书特书,点到为止就够了。
Organization:
说说本文另一个特点,就是第一段引介写得特别长。原因是作者把下面将要提及的三点先做出提要了。
这么写这么几个好处:
在建设每段内容之后,可以有个依据;相当于找到了三个圆心,剩下的只要规整地画好圆就行了。
另外,文章的结构也比较完整,事先把自己的东西抛出来,给人更深的印象。
不过这么操作也有相当的难度,一个是语言一定要够精简,能用最少的话表达好意思,防止累赘;另一个是要想的够快,能够把点想全并快速串起来。如果说论点只是三个分割没很多联系的论点,我觉得用这种开头只是罗列论点,更容易显得累赘。
还有一处值得一说,例证用的很好,而且论证扩散起来很广阔的感觉。这种情况下最常见的就是跑题,思路一奔跑起来难免刹不住车~
不过这篇文章在第二第三段的末尾,均做了收束。这点比较值得大家借鉴,而且请注意,这个收束可以简单地做总结陈词,然而仔细读这两句结尾,其实相较段首句子,内容上还是有略微的上升的,不过不要走得太远~
Language:
很赞就对了 |
|