- 最后登录
- 2023-4-26
- 在线时间
- 1375 小时
- 寄托币
- 190070
- 声望
- 10000465
- 注册时间
- 2002-6-8
- 阅读权限
- 255
- 帖子
- 1132
- 精华
- 65
- 积分
- 10006467
- UID
- 30358
   
- 声望
- 10000465
- 寄托币
- 190070
- 注册时间
- 2002-6-8
- 精华
- 65
- 帖子
- 1132
|
91”Most people think that their deeply held values are the result of rational choice, but reason often has little to do with the way people form values.”
Nowadays there increasingly arises much concern about whether reason plays a role in people forming values or not. As the assertion presented by speaker that most people think that their deeply held values are the result of rational choice, but reason often has little to do with the way people form values. Nevertheless, in my opinion, the deeply believed values are the result of rational choice by people as well as their ancestors.
First of all, in the face of different values, people tend to choose one by considering thoroughly and reasonably. One popular example involves people’s rational choice toward the 9.11 terrorism. Whenthe Taliban government proposed and spread the value of terrorism by attacking the Pentagon building, the Americans as well as all other peace-lovers stood out to excoriate the terrorisms with their cold-blooded and brutal terrors. Undeniably, most people chose (这个错误不应该啊)peace rather than terrorism by reasonable thought. Accordingly, it is via people’ rational, logical, and prudential choice that determine to accept or reject the values newly emerged.
Some may argue that most of people’ deeply held values are chiefly instilled by education, and are profoundly influenced by their own culture. This specious argument demonstrates that people’ values are primarily determined by culture rather than their own choice. Nevertheless, where did these values deprive? Why are they cherished and selected to preserve? The only answer(用“有且仅有一个答案”如何。呵呵) is that all these deeply held values are the reasonable choice by not only our ancestors, but also our modern people. Just take a look into America history, one need look no further to find that without Washington’s rational choice of independence and democracy, or Lincoln’s reasonable choice of equality, or Martin Luther King’s wise choice against racial discrimination, these value as freedom, democracy, and equality would not be so deeply rooted in American’s mind. Consequently, the values that are commonly taken over world such as peace, democracy, love, cooperation and so on, are the very choice of our ancestors and are passed down from a generation to generation.(如果有可能考虑某些盛行的错误的思想如何?)
Some other people in favor of speaker’s assertion may claim that there are also many values determined by the external forces, such as laws, which are beyond people’s free choice. I concede that indeed, every country has carried out a series of various laws for its citizens to abide by in order to assure the stability of society. However, if only one remembered the failure of Prohibition during the 1930s, and more recently, failed federal legislation to regulate access to adult material via the Internet, as well as the innumerable rules and regulations under continuous amending in order to adapt the updated situations, may he or she clearly realize that it is also people’s reasonable consideration to decision which law is feasible to carry out, which law should be edited, and even which law should be abandoned. In short, once people sensibly chose such valuable values (考虑一下换表达)as peace, democracy apart from violence and anarchy, a series of systematic and reasonable laws are another desirable rational choice of people, including the values embodied in the laws.
In sum, from the full discussion offered above, we may draw the persuasive conclusion that people’ deeply held values are actually the result of their rational choice, no matter the values imparted by education and preserved by culture, or the values apparently determined by laws, as a matter of fact, all these values are the richness of our entire human legacy chosen, preserved and passed down by one generation to another.
IVY的例子总是不错,忽然让我想到了HAPPYMAN,呵呵。
写得不错。不过还是有一点没有懂,你第三段是在论证他是自己的选择吗?是不是和论点有差异啊。如果是我理解错了,希望你讲一下。如果不是,那这个问题就比较严重了。 |
|