02
Gist: this article attempts to explain a question that why canon lawyer association failed to effectively implement their disciplinary action standard to their erring members. Two possible reasons are presented, and the first one is only short discussed and got quitted soon, and then the second reason is discussed more detailed. Specifically, two considerations are embraced . The first one is the comparison between England civil court and E courts. There are more cases for opposing legal professionals. Furthermore, there were many complaints from the church authorities for the failure of taking the moral standards for legal professions. But finally, the author points out the paradox exists because criticism should conduce to the solidarity of the canon lawyers and which can induce their moral standards.
P1 introduce background and posits the problem of this article. TS the 2nd sentence.
P2 Two interpretations are presented for the problem posed in the first paragraph.
P3 and P4 negate the first interpretation and analyze the 2nd one in detail.
P5 criticizes the above interpretation by indicating its paradox parts.
Attitude, as far as I concern, the author don't agree that the lawyers are lack of disciplinary action but only for the members in the canon lawyer guild.
然后看了解析以后发现自己,错的离谱了……
03 status of birds
this article firstly states that aggressive action is positive related to bird’s status, though, due to aggressive action is highly related with more injuries, so birds would not exactly be aggressive all the time but to project a certain signal to warn others. The theory of darker throat tries to explain this phenomenon, however, it is problematic since the experiment data fails to support this theory’s conclusion. Then another theory is introduced afterward, and the author seems to support this one very much, that is the theory about breast strip width. Finally, a simulate experiment is presented to further bolster this theory.
Gist: breast strip width theory can effectively applied to the phenomenon those birds usually not necessary to act aggressive truly but to show a signal of aggressive to attain their social status.
P1 background. Introduces the phenomenon of possessing attributes to maintain bird’s status. TS: line 10-14 P2 1st theory to explain the problem posed in para1. P3 Negates the theory in 2nd para and gives reasons for it. P4 Alternative theory is posed here. P5 further evidence for this new theory.
Attitude: support the 2nd theory but is suspicious for the 1st one.