- 最后登录
- 2004-4-7
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 173
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2003-12-13
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 48
- UID
- 151415

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 173
- 注册时间
- 2003-12-13
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
sorry, but I am not able to change the font style or color
issue 88
"Technologies not only influence but actually determine social customs and ethics."
Taking a brief glance at history of human existence, it is not difficult to draw the conclusion that technology, defined as the application of science and knowledge,(science is partial of human knowledge) has played an important role in bringing transformation and improvement to society. Moreover, I agree with the above saying in the topic that technology should be regarded as a determinative factor which not only influence but also, and more importantly, determine the social custom and ethics.
Generally speaking, it is the trends of social perspective that technology exercises enormous influence on the custom and ethics of mankind. Before the Industrial Revolutionary occurring in Britain in the eighteenth century, women were not allowed to work or study outside their houses apart from some comparatively enlightened places; yet waves of women went into spinneries to work as cotton spinner in the late decade of that century after the jenny were universally ultimate in the factory around Europe. Due to the development and betterment of the equipment, in the early twenties, the difference of working effectiveness between a man and a woman could be ignored, causing feminism campaign all over the world for sexual equality and personality liberation as well as the traditional attitude toward women. Nowadays in this nation, women rushing for offices can be seen everywhere without surprising and discrimination, the scene of which is very different from that of the early last century we could imagine.(only one example is inefficient to prove “determine”, it is still INFLUENCE, quick conclusion)
However, question can be raised why it is believed that the technology rather than the human beings themselves determine the social custom and ethics. Admittedly, in a short period, the intension of individuals and the needs of the social customs, can determine(indicate) the trends technology will follow. Considering the long eras human history covers, it is the technology that guarantees the basic condition for surviving, (What if the term PRODUCTIVE LABOR? Technology, essentially, is the tool applied to accelerate manufacture.) offer an opportunity to mankind to develop human society, and form variable custom and ethics (The original custom and ethics is formed by technology? What came first in human history?) according to the complicated geographical position and uneven levels of technology. (developed with the ever renewed technologies) Without technology of navigation, most nations at present might still hold the belief that they were the center in the universe(but of science discovery?); of industry, millions of women might never ever get the chance to see the scene out of limited sight from their window(How to explain feminie clan?) of commerce, the concept of global village and the consciousness of racial quality might never exist. One specialist on social science has given a proper comment on the function of technology in society: "Technology, has determined the social system and human ideology in the past time, and it will do in the future."(Tautology, meaningless)
As mentioned in the last paragraph, social custom and ethics greatly influence the development of technology, or even sometimes restrict further technological research and experiments. Human cloning, for instance, is legally abandoned in many countries due to the discordance with the ethnics. Still, the concepts of human cloning as well as the experiments on animals challenge with the traditional social perspectives which assert that nature law can be impossibly changed. Furthermore, no one can tell whether in the future, human cloning will become legal, since the technology of tube pregnancy when first contrived was considered illegal while being accepted by almost all the nations today.(These make sense. You see, through all above I can draw a conclusion that technology and human custom and ethics are interacting, interinfluencing.)
In conclusion, technology can be metaphorized as a flowing river, while the social custom and ethics as the banks, on which preserves human civilization( and cultures). Although banks are seemed to control the direction to which the flow is headed, the river has made them first.(That’s new, but I donnot agree.)
88.Technologies not only influence but also actually determine social customs and ethics.
Social customs as well as ethics are a set of protocols the society set for itself to attain some equilibrium in society. As is well known, that customs and ethics tell us what is right and what is forbidden. But these criterions are merely the results of the previous social conditons and inevitably varied with the present situation. Technology, the source of evoluting propulsion, have been so fast changing people's principles of behavior so that our society almost changes with the days. So we are fully aware of technology's overwhleming impact on people's customs and ethics.(the most important impact is different from determining in degree)
But why does technology change huaman's behaviorial principles? Technology, in one word, enables us to accomplish what was impossible for us in the past. As a result, someting which was the previledge confined to certain groups of people, will not possess this attribute. This will obviously break the harmony of the distribution of social interests. And naturally some will try their best to maitain what they have acquired while some others will strive to gain a favorable position in this very threshold period. That is a situation very much simillar to that of a game. Everyone wants to win but everyone's success depends on the other's, which will inherently gives rise to the concession and compromise between them. Thus certain corrections will be superimposed on the old principles. Only in this way can they avoid the destructive effects of chaotic and irrational competition. An example can best enlighten this point. In antient times, education was only limitted to the aristocrat class, which is due to the social conditions then---It is impossible as well as unecessary for knowledge to be spread among the ordinary people. But with the emergence of new technology, there arose a demand for large quantities of skilled workers. That intrinsic demand was driven by the application of the new technology. Therefore, education became accessive for most people and the aristocrats lost their priviledge.(I don’t think they are perfectly comparable. The principal theory of games is examining the opponent, upon which one’s decision is made. The relationship between the opponents is contradicted or isolated- one would perform an action even at the expense of the other’s lost. But the relationship between technology and social custom and ethics is toward harmony, which may be called inter-adapting. If a figuration is in your intention, I suggest SPRIAL PATTERN.)
We can also deduce from other aspect that technology naturally causes the change of people's customs and ethics. Now that technology bring impossible into reality, some customs, which was upholded by all due to the lack of some resources which abound now, will be desitined to collapse. Hundreds of years ago, most women don't work and concurrently there were not enough jobs suitable for them. With the technology improvement there were more and more tasks which did not necessarily require the worker to be a man. And a cheap female worker may even do a better job than a male in some areas. So the old custom was changed, which is the certainly the consequency of technology progress.
In other sense, technology(along with science, which is previous and has direct influence on mental cognization) innovation enlarges the people's range of knowledge and makes people more conscious of the law of their society. Humans' mental capacity has been being promoted by technology that they are more self-independent than before. Or other, they can use their brains better and is more unaffected by the outer circumstances. Humans are more able to discern what is right and what does not sound.(This is an assertion. How can we say affirmatively that the youngsters who watch TV and play machinery games all the time available are more thoughtful and hence more conscious than those philosophical ancestors who read and debated with each other as a custom while little technology was provided?)Outdated customs and ethics are made more easily subject to hamans' amending.
In summary, technology influences and even changes people's principles of behavior, which will certainly cause people's customs and ethics open to corrections(They have been being open from the very beginning.). On the other hand, technology makes the people understand themselves more deeply and readily to go on an action altering their banal and even harmful customs.(Not all customs are harmful and banal, a definitive subclause may sound more reasonably.) |
|