关于issue文章两种不同展开思路的分析&讨论

galaxysongUID: 152834

I don't think it worthy to give examples immediately after a definition. On logics and reasoning does the key value of "beating the bush" structure depend. Of course, smooth articulation is of no less importance than reasoning is. It will be better to say "Before addressing the issue, ...."  before your first definition.

YevgrafUID: 154550

to syd:

问题只是很多抽象的题既难以精确定义又难以找到例子。
比如issue224: Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified. 正在讨论的。
给censorship下一个定义是绝对必要的。但是还要举一个和本质上不是定义的例子，个人认为不容易。
再如issue35,就是你开始提出的那道，对belief的定义举例子（就按照你那个定义），同样觉得有些困难。
而且支持定义的例子必须比支持分论点的例子更精确，因为例子的每个特征都需要和定义符合。
总之感觉在语言表达能力不强的情况下比较抽象的题确实难写（废话的说）

imongUID: 140258

楼上的：看看这个，老外280里面story teller那道题的第一个body

One reason why I agree with the speaker's fundamental claim lies in the distinction between the role of historian and the roles of archivist and journalist. By "archivist" I refer generally to any person whose task is to document and preserve evidence of past events. And by "journalist" I mean any person whose task is to record, by writing, film, or some other media, factual events as they occur--for the purpose of creating evidence of those events. It is not the proper function of either the journalist or the archivist to tell a story. Rather, it is their function to provide evidence to the historian, who then pieces together the evidence to construct history, as the speaker suggests. In other words, unless we grant to the historian a license to "construct" history by interpreting evidence, we relegate the historian to the role of mere archivist or journalist.

也可以说人家是举例子，但是我觉得，说“contrast”“comparison”更合适一些。不一定非要局限于example，比较狠的文章也可以通篇没例子的说。只要你的reasoning有道理，直接从common sense来，我觉得没问题。

sydUID: 151948

TO GALAXYSONG：
这个“BEFORE ADDRESING THE ISSUE。。”很有用，谢谢。BUT 打外围 可不是那个 “BEAT ABOUT THE BUSH ”哦，是和题目间接相关的，“BEAT 。。。”是指说和题目毫不沾边的话，在FAMILY ALBUM USA 里提到过的。
TO IMONG：
我看了一下ETS 的例文，其实有几篇也是“打外围”或者类似的，看来这么写是有“官方认同”的
TO Yevgraf：
对我的打外围提纲的1 论点我是准备这么论述（还没有正式写，过几天把行为类的提纲列完了就写它，然后贴出来 :D ）
1，信仰是个人的行为的最高准则，是个体判断事物的标准，态度和方式方法的综合。
Poeple conduct their beheaviors in the society according to their different believes,which are regarded as personal ways of thinking and indivisual policies.It is through judging if the things happened and problems arosed are subject to the belief that one possesses that he or she makes the final decision.Different believes lead to different chioses and consequences.Larry eliison ,founder of the the leading database company Oracle,entered 3 different universities without graduation or diploma,he simply holds the belief that diploma has nothing to do with the process of discovering the real worthy and original technology ,in contrast ,he developed his core competence in the database industry by his self-guided learning.Form this point the effct that belief takes in poeple's life is quite clear.

so猫UID: 148633

我觉得 打外围的话 最后回到中心很重要
要不然就绝对走题 就怕好多人写的头脑发昏就回不来
至于分开说 我觉得也不错 好多倾向于正不好反不好折中最好的题目可以这样写
呵呵~~~

imongUID: 140258

可能有点啰嗦了，不过我想我还是得提醒一下：不管是打外围还是什么，顺序安排有时候是不能够颠倒的——例如作铺垫（也就是大家说的打外围？）的东西绝对不能在倒数第二段写，否则写一个跑一个。原来似乎还有过不少人这样干。