issue26 [color=#1b00ff]pp3模考的~~字数适宜~~嘿嘿~~~来掐我啊！

lovebrianUID: 157127

------题目------
Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society's past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes. In such situations, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that contemporary needs can be served.
------正文------
With the pace of modernization, more buildings would be built as a result more places are needed.  Consequently, there is a debate concerning that whether the old buildings should be superceded by the new ones.  As far as I am concerned, people ought to consider the actual situation case-by-case to decide which one should be given precedence.

On the one hand, a considerable amount of the ancient buildings maintain great significant value that the new ones would never to gain the same, therefore, people should try our best to prevent these historical treasure form being destroyed in order to let their beauty and historical value pass down.  Especially in such countries that has a long and complicated history, for example China.  As is known to all, the Beijing City is famous for its colorful and long history upon which many old and famous buildings could be standing in the city even today.  The most famous, Forbidden City, has become an appealing and attracting building today especially for tourism.  The Forbidden City is not only the protecting project of China government, but also, it has gained an indispensable position in the hearts of us Chinese people, in our nation.  Such an old building is never a mere construction, but a symbol of the confidence, reputation, and honor of China.  Thus, probably there are and will be no other new ones could replace it.  To some extent, human beings should take good care of these weighty buildings since they are not only buildings at all.

On the other hand, some new projects with a definitive and considerable purpose toward people could be given precedence when facing some buildings though old but without value.  For instant, surely many old houses are left here today in that many have not be destroyed or replaced for being neglected but do cost lots of areas.  To illustrate this point, we can take a look at my hometown.  My city has a long history and therefore many old houses still stand there.  And many people are living in such old and even dangerous buildings.  A significant plan is made by the government that they would like to widen the streets and build a new square in the very place where most of the old houses lie.  This plan is sustained by us citizens immediately in that all the projects are quite important and desiring, moreover, people living in the old ones could move into new buildings or get relative money if they like.  So to speak, to make people more convenient, to make the city more beautiful, to make the place more significant, the old ones of little value have no choice but give their way to the new ones.  

Accordingly, it is not a simple case to say yes or no to answer the question that whether the new ones must be given precedence.  Best method to handle this problem for the government is to do considerate and full-viewed work.  That is to evaluate the true value both of the ancient buildings and the new ones, then make a comparison between the two, thus make a decision.  It is also necessary for government to consider the views of the public with an eye to avoiding the partial decision only reflecting the interest of the government or the profits.  Or the government may do something declining their reputation in the society.

To sum up, people must pay attention to the old cherished treasure being handed down by our wise ancestors and at the same time make a proper and right decision toward the destiny of the old but little value ones due to that the ground could be better used for modern purposes.（641限时）

casablancaUID: 160003

很清晰啊，向前辈学习！！
只是不知道第三段最后的college怎么来的？

lovebrianUID: 157127

最初由 casablanca 发布
[B]很清晰啊，向前辈学习！！
只是不知道第三段最后的college怎么来的？ [/B]

突然想把现代的冬冬给具体化一下~~~那句话是后来补上的~~完全可以不要~~~哈哈 我看着也别扭 :cool:

:D 偶不是什么前辈阿~~偶是菜鸟

casablancaUID: 160003

吼吼，至少也是我们菜鸟中的前辈咯！
问一下，如果现在一小时大概写到600字，21号考试
应该什么时候限时嘞？

lovebrianUID: 157127

最初由 casablanca 发布
[B]吼吼，至少也是我们菜鸟中的前辈咯！
问一下，如果现在一小时大概写到600字，21号考试
应该什么时候限时嘞？ [/B]

尽早！争取提高单位时间的数量和质量~~~

sniper613UID: 147372

好，满足你的欲望。一会来掐你

发呆的小熊UID: 139071

------题目------
Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society's past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes. In such situations, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that contemporary needs can be served.
------正文------
With the pace of modernization, more buildings would be built as a result thatmore places residencesare needed. Consequently, there is a debate concerning that whether the old buildings should be superceded by the new ones. As far as I am concerned, people ought to consider the actual situation case-by-case to decide which one should be given precedence.

On the one hand, a considerable amount of the ancient buildings maintain great significant value that the new ones would never to gain the same, therefore, people should try our best to prevent these historical treasuretreasures formfrom being destroyed in order to letpass their beauty and historical value pass删去 down. Especially in such countries that has a long and complicated history, for example China病句吧！. As is known to all, the Beijing City is famous for its colorful and long history upon which many old and famous buildings could be standing in the city even today这一句不太好. The most famous, Forbidden City, has become an appealing and attracting building today especially for tourism. The Forbidden City is not only the protecting project of China government, but also, it has gained an indispensable position in the hearts of us Chinese people, in our nation多余了. Such an old building is never a mere construction, but a symbol of the confidence, reputation, and honor of China前两个词是不是用得太夸张啦？故宫没有那么大的代表性吧. Thus, probably there are and will be no other new ones could replace it. To some extent, human beings should take good care of these weighty这么用成吗？我再查查 buildings since they are not only buildings at all.这段总感觉是点到了一些点，但展开得不好，最终好像都在重复一句话：这些老建筑不只是建筑。那是什么？这一点应该多费些笔墨，比如强调其美学价值、代表一些历史上重要事件或者重要人物的价值，或者其不可复制性等等，甚至可以从反面讲一讲有些城市比如北京在无知地破坏了一些珍贵的建筑之后追悔莫及等等都可以吧

On the other hand, some new projects with a definitive and considerable purpose toward people could be given precedence when facing some buildings though old but without value. For instant, surely many old houses are left here today in that这一句不是太明白 many have not be destroyed or replaced for being neglected but do cost lots of areas. To illustrate this point, we can take a look at my hometown. My city has a long history and therefore这层递进关系也不是很对 many old houses still stand there. And many people are living in such old and even dangerous buildings. A significant plan is made by the government that they would like to widen the streets and build a new square in the very place where most of the old houses lie. This plan is sustained by us citizens immediately in that all the projects are quite important and desiring, moreover, people living in the old ones could move into new buildings or get relative money if they like. So to speak, to make people more convenient, to make the city more beautiful, to make the place more significant, the old ones of little value have no choice but give their way to the new ones. Otherwise, it is undesirable that some ugly and useless buildings take lots of area but the government has no place to build a college最后一句太突兀了。这一段话不少，但也总觉得没有点到地方。可以多说说改善现代人们生活质量的重要性，争迫性等等。你家乡城市的那个例子很好，但没有说好，我的感觉.

Accordingly, it is not a simple case to say yes or no to answer the question that whether the new ones must be given precedence. Best method to handle this problem for the government is to do considerate and full-viewed work. That is to evaluate the true value both of the ancient buildings and the new ones, then make a comparison between the two, thus make a decision. It is also necessary for government to consider the views of the public with an eye to avoiding the partial decision only reflecting这个词太中国化了吧！represent是不是好一些？ the interest of the government or the profits. Or the government may do something declining their reputation in the society.

To sum up, people must pay attention to the old cherished treasure being handed down by our wise ancestors and at the same time make a proper and right decision toward the destiny of the old but little value ones due to that the ground could be better used for modern purposes.（641限时）
呵呵，胡说八道了很多，其实我知道限时的难处，我刚也限了一篇，惨不忍睹呀！
这道题目我要写的话就写反对意见，往狠里写，呵呵。想盖新楼？俺奏是不同意！俺当钉子户！

lovebrianUID: 157127

最初由 发呆的小熊 发布------题目------
Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society's past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes. In such situations, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that contemporary needs can be served.
------正文------
With the pace of modernization, more buildings would be built as a result thatmore places residencesare needed. Consequently, there is a debate concerning that whether the old buildings should be superceded by the new ones. As far as I am concerned, people ought to consider the actual situation case-by-case to decide which one should be given precedence.

On the one hand, a considerable amount of the ancient buildings maintain great significant value that the new ones would never to gain the same, therefore, people should try our best to prevent these historical treasuretreasures formfrom being destroyed in order to letpass their beauty and historical value pass删去 down. Especially in such countries that has a long and complicated history, for example China病句吧！超级病句. As is known to all, the Beijing City is famous for its colorful and long history upon which many old and famous buildings could be standing in the city even today这一句不太好. The most famous, Forbidden City, has become an appealing and attracting building today especially for tourism. The Forbidden City is not only the protecting project of China government, but also, it has gained an indispensable position in the hearts of us Chinese people, in our nation多余了. Such an old building is never a mere construction, but a symbol of the confidence, reputation, and honor of China前两个词是不是用得太夸张啦？故宫没有那么大的代表性吧有没有，是写出来的~~~唬老外阿. Thus, probably there are and will be no other new ones could replace it. To some extent, human beings should take good care of these weighty这么用成吗？我再查查 buildings since they are not only buildings at all.这段总感觉是点到了一些点，但展开得不好，最终好像都在重复一句话：这些老建筑不只是建筑。那是什么？这一点应该多费些笔墨，比如强调其美学价值、代表一些历史上重要事件或者重要人物的价值，或者其不可复制性等等，甚至可以从反面讲一讲有些城市比如北京在无知地破坏了一些珍贵的建筑之后追悔莫及等等都可以吧明白你的意思了，反例没想举~~正在尝试多说点论证，例子短点

On the other hand, some new projects with a definitive and considerable purpose toward people could be given precedence when facing some buildings though old but without value. For instant, surely many old houses are left here today in that这一句不是太明白 many have not be destroyed or replaced for being neglected but do cost lots of areas. To illustrate this point, we can take a look at my hometown. My city has a long history and therefore这层递进关系也不是很对 many old houses still stand there. And many people are living in such old and even dangerous buildings. A significant plan is made by the government that they would like to widen the streets and build a new square in the very place where most of the old houses lie. This plan is sustained by us citizens immediately in that all the projects are quite important and desiring, moreover, people living in the old ones could move into new buildings or get relative money if they like. So to speak, to make people more convenient, to make the city more beautiful, to make the place more significant, the old ones of little value have no choice but give their way to the new ones. Otherwise, it is undesirable that some ugly and useless buildings take lots of area but the government has no place to build a college最后一句太突兀了。这一段话不少，但也总觉得没有点到地方。可以多说说改善现代人们生活质量的重要性，争迫性等等。你家乡城市的那个例子很好，但没有说好，我的感觉.最后一句山了吧~~那是我最后加上的~~~~~

Accordingly, it is not a simple case to say yes or no to answer the question that whether the new ones must be given precedence. Best method to handle this problem for the government is to do considerate and full-viewed work. That is to evaluate the true value both of the ancient buildings and the new ones, then make a comparison between the two, thus make a decision. It is also necessary for government to consider the views of the public with an eye to avoiding the partial decision only reflecting这个词太中国化了吧！反映和代表，不是一个意思吧？represent是不是好一些？ the interest of the government or the profits. Or the government may do something declining their reputation in the society.

To sum up, people must pay attention to the old cherished treasure being handed down by our wise ancestors and at the same time make a proper and right decision toward the destiny of the old but little value ones due to that the ground could be better used for modern purposes.（641限时）
呵呵，胡说八道了很多，其实我知道限时的难处，我刚也限了一篇，惨不忍睹呀！
这道题目我要写的话就写反对意见，往狠里写，呵呵。想盖新楼？俺奏是不同意！俺当钉子户！你这样写很容易出彩~~~但是也很容易偏激~~~给人分析部全面地感觉~~

呵呵~~批得很不错啦！！嘿嘿
多谢

sniper613UID: 147372

Issue26
Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society's past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes. In such situations, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that contemporary needs can be served.
------正文------
With the pace of modernization, more buildings would be built (断句，and)as a result more places are needed. Consequently, there is a debate concerning that whether the old buildings should be superseded by the new ones. As far as I am concerned, people ought to consider the actual situation case-by-case（又是盗版！版权拿来！呵呵~~~~） to decide which one should be given precedence.

On the one hand, a considerable amount of the ancient buildings maintain great significant value that the new ones would never to gain the same, （断句！）therefore, people should try our（their） best to prevent these historical treasure form(?!偶也经常打错的字) being destroyed in order to let their beauty and historical value pass down. Especially in such countries that has a long and complicated history, for example China.（不完整的句子） As is known to all, the Beijing City is famous for its colorful and long history upon which many old and famous buildings could be standing in the city even today. The most famous（著名什么嘛！）,（Purple） Forbidden City, has become an appealing and attracting（重复！） building today especially for tourism. The Forbidden City is not only the protecting project of China government, but also, it has gained an indispensable position in the hearts of us Chinese people, in our nation（应该说说在联合国的地位）. Such an old building is never a mere construction, but a symbol of the confidence, reputation, and honor of China. Thus, probably there are and will be no other new ones could replace it. To some extent, human beings should take good care of these weighty buildings since they are not only buildings at all. （since后面的句子什么意思？加个weighty干嘛？）

On the other hand, some new projects with a definitive and considerable purpose toward people could be given precedence when facing some buildings though old but without value. For instant, surely many old houses are left here today in that many have not be destroyed or replaced for being neglected but do cost lots of areas. To illustrate this point, we can take a look at my hometown（济南？很一般嘛，不算老啊，题外话哈~~）. My city has a long history and therefore many old houses still stand there. And many people are living in such old （and 多余） even dangerous buildings. A significant plan is made by the government that they（谁？） would like to widen the streets and build a new square in the very place where most of the old houses lie. This plan is sustained by us citizens immediately in that all the projects are quite important and desiring, moreover, people living in the old ones could move into new buildings or get relative money if they like. So to speak, to make people more convenient, to make the city more beautiful, to make the place more significant（好像前面用了n次了，useful行吗？）, the old ones of little value have no choice but give their way to the new ones. Otherwise, it is undesirable that some ugly and useless buildings take lots of area but the government has no place to build a college（莫名其妙！来个大学干嘛？嫌CUMT小啊！呵呵~~）.

Accordingly, it is not a simple case to say yes or no to answer the question that whether the new ones must be given precedence. Best method to handle this problem for the government is to do considerate and full-viewed work. That is to evaluate the true value both of the ancient buildings and the new ones, then make a comparison between the two, thus make a decision. It is also necessary for government to consider the views of the public with an eye to avoiding the partial decision only reflecting the interest of the government or the profits. Or the government may do something declining their reputation in the society.

To sum up, people must pay attention to the old cherished treasure being handed down by our wise ancestors and at the same time make a proper and right decision toward the destiny of the old but little value ones due to that the ground could be better used for modern purposes.（641限时）

可以，意思很清楚。

PS：顺便问一个问题，因为你是学生物的，哪一个物种是人类出现后，因自然原因灭绝了的？

lovebrianUID: 157127

最初由 sniper613 发布
With the pace of modernization, more buildings would be built (断句，and)as a result more places are needed. Consequently, there is a debate concerning that whether the old buildings should be superseded by the new ones. As far as I am concerned, people ought to consider the actual situation case-by-case（又是盗版！版权拿来！呵呵~~~~）5555 那你杀了我吧！哈哈~~ :eek: to decide which one should be given precedence.

On the one hand, a considerable amount of the ancient buildings maintain great significant value that the new ones would never to gain the same, （断句！）therefore, people should try our（their） best to prevent these historical treasure form(?!偶也经常打错的字) 我晕~~word也查不出来的错being destroyed in order to let their beauty and historical value pass down. Especially in such countries that has a long and complicated history, for example China.（不完整的句子）大病句阿 As is known to all, the Beijing City is famous for its colorful and long history upon which many old and famous buildings could be standing in the city even today. The most famous（著名什么嘛！）倒~,（Purple） Forbidden City, has become an appealing and attracting（重复！）俺故意这么用的~~555 building today especially for tourism. The Forbidden City is not only the protecting project of China government, but also, it has gained an indispensable position in the hearts of us Chinese people, in our nation（应该说说在联合国的地位）想来着~~~忘了写了. Such an old building is never a mere construction, but a symbol of the confidence, reputation, and honor of China. Thus, probably there are and will be no other new ones could replace it. To some extent, human beings should take good care of these weighty buildings since they are not only buildings at all. （since后面的句子什么意思？加个weighty干嘛？）汗！……

On the other hand, some new projects with a definitive and considerable purpose toward people could be given precedence when facing some buildings though old but without value. For instant, surely many old houses are left here today in that many have not be destroyed or replaced for being neglected but do cost lots of areas. To illustrate this point, we can take a look at my hometown（济南？很一般嘛，不算老啊，题外话哈~~） :D . My city has a long history and therefore many old houses still stand there. And many people are living in such old （and 多余） even dangerous buildings. A significant plan is made by the government that they（谁？） would like to widen the streets and build a new square in the very place where most of the old houses lie. This plan is sustained by us citizens immediately in that all the projects are quite important and desiring, moreover, people living in the old ones could move into new buildings or get relative money if they like. So to speak, to make people more convenient, to make the city more beautiful, to make the place more significant（好像前面用了n次了，useful行吗？）我一限时就这样了！ :mad: , the old ones of little value have no choice but give their way to the new ones. Otherwise, it is undesirable that some ugly and useless buildings take lots of area but the government has no place to build a college（莫名其妙！来个大学干嘛？嫌CUMT小啊！呵呵~~）.我删了吧

Accordingly, it is not a simple case to say yes or no to answer the question that whether the new ones must be given precedence. Best method to handle this problem for the government is to do considerate and full-viewed work. That is to evaluate the true value both of the ancient buildings and the new ones, then make a comparison between the two, thus make a decision. It is also necessary for government to consider the views of the public with an eye to avoiding the partial decision only reflecting the interest of the government or the profits. Or the government may do something declining their reputation in the society.

To sum up, people must pay attention to the old cherished treasure being handed down by our wise ancestors and at the same time make a proper and right decision toward the destiny of the old but little value ones due to that the ground could be better used for modern purposes.（641限时）

可以，意思很清楚。

PS：顺便问一个问题，因为你是学生物的，哪一个物种是人类出现后，因自然原因灭绝了的？太多了~~我认为大部分都是自然灭绝的~~尤其是微生物等

sniper613UID: 147372

给个具体的名字好不好？
The most famous（著名什么嘛！）倒~,（Purple） Forbidden City, has become an appealing and attracting（重复！）俺故意这么用的~~555 building today especially for tourism.
你的Forbidden City是被看成插入语，所以famous后面少一个主语

sniper613UID: 147372

我是说物种的具体名字

lovebrianUID: 157127

最初由 sniper613 发布
[B]给个具体的名字好不好？
The most famous（著名什么嘛！）倒~,（Purple） Forbidden City, has become an appealing and attracting（重复！）俺故意这么用的~~555 buildi..

以下省略...... [/B]

我知道啊~~，省略了~~前面句子的名词重复，我就把这里省略了~~~~~sigh~~~不知道是不是语病啊 :eek:

lovebrianUID: 157127

最初由 sniper613 发布
[B]我是说物种的具体名字 [/B]

澳洲袋狼  据我所知，好像不是人类造成的！


我去洗澡了`~回来说

sniper613UID: 147372

袋狼是澳洲绝种动物，它看起来像狼又像袋鼠，腹部有个育儿袋，在绝迹前，澳洲、新几内亚、塔斯马尼亚岛都能看到，由于会攻击羊群，人类才展开捕杀，并在五十年内，将它猎捕殆尽，最后一只袋狼在动物园死于一九三六年，澳洲官方在一九八六年正式宣布袋狼绝迹。