- 最后登录
- 2025-4-28
- 在线时间
- 26346 小时
- 寄托币
- 8632
- 声望
- 730
- 注册时间
- 2014-3-6
- 阅读权限
- 50
- 帖子
- 4548
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 14374
- UID
- 3505689
  
- 声望
- 730
- 寄托币
- 8632
- 注册时间
- 2014-3-6
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 4548
|
本帖最后由 cheesechan 于 2015-4-15 20:32 编辑
二本先生 发表于 2015-4-15 20:14 ![]()
嗯嗯,唉唉LZ感叹自己工作一年还是摆脱不了Naive啊,谢谢学长,我再考虑考虑,再问问石溪写推的老师们,谢 ...
let me say it a bit more detailed:
1. if one is going for a PhD in econ in Europe, and want both reputation in private sector and (academic + public) sector, France and Spain should likely be out of consideration.
The main reason is that all the famous business school are stand alone one, i.e. which are seperated out of traditional universities, and thus the econ department don't share the network of them.
e.g. HEC, INSEAD, ESSEC, IE, ESADE, IESE are all famous Business (there), but when People talk about economics, TSE, PSE, CEMFI, UPF, Carlos III are on the list - no overlap.
while in UK, Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland, it is not really the case: LSE, UCL, Oxford, Warwick, Cambridge are all target of BB, Amsterdam and Erasmus Rotterdam also have solid industry reputation in financial industry; in Germany and Switzerland, things are not that much not still simialr, Mannheim are both top tier in econ and business, UZH/HSG are the best in econ/business within country but the other side of them are not weak too......
Italy is not really a case as there are only one school that we will concern about....(EUI is good but in general it is for European only)
2. reputation in Banking......indeed i guess still depends on which department. if one apply to the Economist, some financial / macro stuffs one in Banking, i guess it is like a Team of econ/fina phd.....and thus likely they will share a more similar view as academics......i.e. we all know UPF > TSE in Marco......indeed they might not view things like this, but view your research output instead, but still better faculty are likely to let you have better academic output.... |
|