- 最后登录
- 2016-11-5
- 在线时间
- 315 小时
- 寄托币
- 295
- 声望
- 73
- 注册时间
- 2015-3-4
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 48
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 217
- UID
- 3599229
 
- 声望
- 73
- 寄托币
- 295
- 注册时间
- 2015-3-4
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 48
|
本帖最后由 ytfteggw 于 2015-7-28 11:30 编辑
7.23 argument 62 121 122 124
Argument 62
The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals.
"In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps, a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacteria population than did the liquid hand soaps currently used in our hospitals. During a subsequent test of UltraClean at our hospital in Workby, that hospital reported significantly fewer cases of patient infection than did any of the other hospitals in our group. Therefore, to prevent serious patient infections, we should supply UltraClean at all hand-washing stations throughout our hospital system.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
感想:
计时 37分钟,这个速度还是不行,下周可以一两天模仿老师,然后一两篇自己想限时写。看一下连想带写要多少时间。
先自己列提纲,再去看老师的范文,再参考一下其他同学如何探索其他的可能性。
我觉得“探索可能性”也要尽量有递进的感觉。
建议你把计时练习和列提纲打腹稿区分开来 后者可以不限时
In the memo, the director recommended supplying UltraClean at all hand-washing stations throughout their hospital system with the belief that it can reduce the number of patient infection cases. To fully evaluate the argument, we need to reexamine the assumption made in the argument about the lab results and why Workby had fewer cases of patient infection and the link between hand-washing and infection.
注意serious infection
about 后面跟why 搭配有问题
hand washing- washing hand
To begin with, it is assumed that the UltraClean would outperform other hand soaps when used in hospitals. The mere fact that a concentrated solution of UltraClean did a better job in reducing bacteria population in a lab study is insufficient to ensure that UltraClean would do the same trick in hospitals. Maybe the concentrated solution of UltraClean have more active ingredient that would kill bacteria, while when applied to make a hand-washing product, the solution have to be diluted. Besides, the lab conditions are totally different from hospital environment. For example, hospitals are exposed to bacteria with people going around whearas the lab conditions are strictly controlled. Therefore, it would be hard to reduce bacteria in hospitals compared with labs. If such is the case, it would be imprudent to claim that UltraClean would be better in bacteria reduction.
第二点有点牵强 或许洗手 和 实验的条件之间的区别 可以讨论一下
段落最后要讨论如果这个假设不成立的话 对于论证本身的影响 Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Another assumption made in the argument is that it is because of the use of UltraClean that Workby have fewer infection cases. However, there are many other factors that have an influence on the patient infection cases. For instance, there could be fewer people who are susceptive to infection that Workby hospital admitted during the subsequent test. Or the Workby hospital might have more awareness of preventing patient from infection and they required their patient to frequently wash their hands. It is also possible that the sanitary conditions in Workby hospital are much better than any hospital in the group. If it turns out that the Workby hospital had fewer infection cases due to factors other than UltraClean, supplying UltraClean at all hand-washing stations may not lead to the desirable results.
it is because of the use of UltraClean that Workby have fewer infection cases.句子结构 其实可以写简单一点吧
the Workby hospital might have more awareness 搭配
they required their patient 指代不明
In addition, it is assumed that the patient infection cases are mainly caused by bacteria in hands,断句 therefore by reducing the hand bacteria, the patient infection cases would decrease. However, there is no guarantee that this is the case. Patients could get infection through many different ways, for example, more visitors, careless nurses etc. Even assuming that the bacteria in hands are to blame for patient infection, it doesn't not follow that UltraClean would kill the bacteria that cause infections. One possibility is that there are such a kind of infection-causing bacteria that can't be washed away in our hands even with the help of UltraClean. In this case, the recommendation would not work out.
注意断句
看到最后也没找到serious 这个词
In conclusion, more efforts should be made to investigate the lab results, the conditions in Workby hospital and the relationship between hand-washing and patient infection before we can decide whether or not the use of UltraClean would reduce the patient infection cases in hospitals.
修改后:
In the memo, the director recommended supplying UltraClean at all hand-washing stations throughout their hospital system with the belief that it can reduce the number of serious patient infection cases. To fully evaluate the argument, we need to reexamine the assumption made in the argument about the lab results and the reason why Workby had fewer cases of patient infection and the link between washing hands and infection.
To begin with, it is assumed that the UltraClean would outperform other hand soaps when used in hospitals. The mere fact that a concentrated solution of UltraClean did a better job in reducing bacteria population in a lab study is insufficient to ensure that UltraClean would do the same trick in hospitals. Maybe the concentrated solution of UltraClean have more active ingredient that would kill bacteria, while when applied to make a hand-washing product, the solution have to be diluted. There is no garantee that the diluted UltraClean solution would be also more effective in reducing bacteria. Then, it would be imprudent to claim that ,by using UltraClean, the number of serious patient infection cases would decrease.
Another assumption made in the argument is that Workby have fewer infection cases due to the use of UltraClean. However, there are many other factors that have an influence on the patient infection cases. For instance, there could be fewer people who are susceptive to infection that Workby hospital admitted during the subsequent test. Or the Workby hospital might be more awareness of preventing patient from infection and nurses in the hospital required their patients to frequently wash their hands. It is also possible that the sanitary conditions in Workby hospital are much better than any hospital in the group. If it turns out that the Workby hospital had fewer infection cases because of factors other than UltraClean, supplying UltraClean at all hand-washing stations may not lead to the desirable results.
In addition, it is assumed that serious patient infection cases are mainly caused by bacteria in hands;therefore by reducing the hand bacteria, serious patient infection cases would decrease. However, there is no guarantee that this is the case. Patients could get infection through many different ways, for example, more visitors, careless nurses etc. Since the argument is foucus on serious patient infection, we need to learn more about the causes of serious infections. Even assuming that the bacteria in hands are to blame for serious patient infection, it doesn't not follow that UltraClean would kill the bacteria that cause serious infection. One possibility is that there are such a kind of serious-infection-causing bacteria that can't be washed away in our hands even with the help of UltraClean. In this case, the recommendation would not work out.
In conclusion, more efforts should be made to investigate the lab results, the conditions in Workby hospital and the relationship between hand-washing and patient infection before we can decide whether or not the use of UltraClean would reduce the patient infection cases in hospitals.
|
|