- 最后登录
- 2016-11-5
- 在线时间
- 315 小时
- 寄托币
- 295
- 声望
- 73
- 注册时间
- 2015-3-4
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 48
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 217
- UID
- 3599229
 
- 声望
- 73
- 寄托币
- 295
- 注册时间
- 2015-3-4
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 48
|
发表于 2015-7-13 20:53:31
|显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 ytfteggw 于 2015-7-17 15:59 编辑
Issue 15 Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
感受:
1.should 类可以从可行性(隐含的假设)和有利性(产生的后果)来想
2.观点可以开门见山不要铺垫,我每次自己开头铺垫会纠结很久。
3.限时写作,超时了,大概37分钟写完,加上修改typo再读一遍文章估计就40分钟了。。。(老师,我感觉自己每次都写不完,我觉得结尾我一般都来不及写,如果缺少结尾会不会有影响?)
4.发现有比较多的typo(10个左右)
5.感觉英文写作写不好很多时候是中文写作也不行,感觉用中文论证都有点困难。
I strongly disagree that educational institutions are supposed to encourage students to major in those fields that seem to be more likely to lead them to lucrative jobs, because there is no such a field that will guarantee a promising future and those students who choose majors that they are not interested in might find themselves unhappy even with a lot of money. While schools may have more successful alumni, in terms of money they made, it doesn't mean that they would donate more to the schools.
你的主旨句好长 虽然语法没问题但是我不鼓励写这么长的句子 读得很累 所以还是断句的问题
It is ridiculous to say that if one chooses a specific major, a lucrative careers will ensue. There are many factors that contribute to one's success, for example, a booming economy that generates great employment opportunities, a network of useful friends that could help people to get important job interviews, a resourceful mind that impresses others, even a little luck. Although the average salary of students graduating from Finance department is higher than students studying for History or Statistics, it doesn't mean that every finance student would be a success. They need to work hard and equip themselves with abilities that employers value a lot. And students with potentials will shine eventually no matter what major they are in.
同样的 第二句偏长 包含的信息太多 尤其是到最后讲luck的时候
最后两句 They need to work hard and equip themselves with abilities that employers value a lot. And students with potentials will shine eventually no matter what major they are in. 和前面的观点结合不够紧密
尤其是最后一句基本离题了
Another reason why the suggestion is not going to work is that students who are not interested in their seemingly promising field would have no incentive to learn. They would not study hard and their academic performance suffer accordingly. Then, without good GPA, they may not live up to what the job market expected. Even if they do a good job in their field, they would be unhappy about their careers since it is not what they want to do. This would definitely compromises their job satisfaction.
主题句有点问题 你得先说这个建议会导致学生对专业没有兴趣 不要跳到没有兴趣的后果上去了
后面的论述还不错
Some people might argue that by encouraging students to study for majors such as Finance or Computer Science , which are believed to be more lucrative field these days, schools could expected to have more affluent alumni. And with the increasing donation these alumni give, schools can buy more cutting-edge equipment and upgrade the facilities on campus to attract more excellent students. However, there is a gap in the argument that there is no guarantee those alumni would donate more. Chances are high that those who end up with careers they do not enjoy might not give a penny to the school who encourage them to choose the field at the beginning.
could expect
however这句里出现两个there is 这样写不太好
In conclusion, while school might see more wealthy alumni if they encourage students to choose fields with promising jobs, but there is no guarantee that students would definitely end up with a fortune as many other factors are also important to lead to their success and those who study for what they interest in would be more likely to have satisfying careers.
while从句里套if 从句不太好
感觉总的来说你的语言表达还不错 也能按照范文思路来写
但是句子太长是个大问题 虽然你的语法并不错 但是句子写得太长始终不好
修改后:
I strongly disagree that educational institutions are supposed to encourage students to major in those fields that seem to be more likely to lead them to lucrative jobs. First, there is no such a field that will guarantee a promising future; moreover, those students who choose majors that they are not interested in might find themselves unhappy even with a lot of money. While schools may have more successful alumni, in terms of money they made, it doesn't mean that they would donate more to the schools.
It is ridiculous to say that if one chooses a specific major, a lucrative career will ensue. There are many factors that contribute to one's success, for example, a booming economy that generates great employment opportunities, a network of useful friends , a resourceful mind and a little luck. Although the average salary of students graduating from Finance department is higher than students studying History or Statistics, it doesn't mean that every finance student would be a success. To get a well-paid job every graduate needs to work hard and equip themselves with abilities that employers value a lot. In other words, the notion that just by getting a degree in some specific field one would have a lucrative careers in the future is nothing but illusion.
Another reason why the suggestion is not going to work is that some students may end up learning something that they don't like. Without interests and passion in their seemingly promising field, students may have no incentive to learn. They would not study hard and their academic performance suffer accordingly. Then, without good GPA, they may not live up to what the job market expected. Even if they do a good job in their field, they would be unhappy about their careers since it is not what they want to do. This would definitely compromise their job satisfaction and obstructs their long-term success .
Some people might argue that by encouraging students to choose majors such as Finance or Computer Science , which are believed to be more lucrative field these days, schools could expect to have more affluent alumni. And with the increasing donation these alumni give, schools can buy more cutting-edge equipment and upgrade the facilities on campus to attract more excellent students. However, the gap in the argument is that there is no guarantee those alumni would donate more. Chances are high that those who end up with careers they do not enjoy might not give a penny to the school which encourage them to choose the field in the beginning.
In conclusion, while schools might see more wealthy alumni with this policy, there is no guarantee that students would definitely end up with a fortune, because many other factors also play a great role to one's success and those studying for what they interest in would be more likely to have satisfying careers. |
|