- 最后登录
- 2024-11-19
- 在线时间
- 26341 小时
- 寄托币
- 8632
- 声望
- 730
- 注册时间
- 2014-3-6
- 阅读权限
- 50
- 帖子
- 4548
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 14374
- UID
- 3505689
- 声望
- 730
- 寄托币
- 8632
- 注册时间
- 2014-3-6
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 4548
|
本帖最后由 cheesechan 于 2015-11-17 19:33 编辑
ulyss 发表于 2015-11-17 10:37
谢谢你的建议!
其实我最开始就很希望能去quantitative finance这类的项目,看了一些项目的课程设置、 ...
1. To stay or not, is a decision before you start you application. The reason is, this is indeed the ultimate goal of education, and thus the choice of school and major depends on this very much.
2. If you are saying, "I want a job in US, but back home is also okay", you will end back in China; if "I must need a job in US, I will die without that", then you have the chances to find one there.
i.e. given that "我自己也没有很强烈的欲望“一定”要留在那边", you will be back China for working after graduation, well.....with at least 99% confident (of course my subject probability measure)
3. If you are not confident that you can handle / get admitted to MFE since the mathematics in quantitative finance, going to economics is not a solution if you want to stay US. It is the mathematics and the coding help you to get the working visa as an international, so if you avoid it, you avoid the STEM way of visa too. Business Analytics may have a slightly lower requirement than quantitative finance (at least they don't have those stochastic calculus and probability measure theory stuffs), so I guess you may consider it together with some statistics master. But again, coding is important. If the role don't require coding, why don't find a local instead?
Afterward, go accounting then; If you are not willing to take that, well........forgot about staying in US.
4. If plan to go back home after graduation, go to a school as famous as possible. Whatever management, economics, finance, or whatever don't matter. Just get a related master, not because of the content that can be applied in work (that's dreaming), but because you don't want your CV to be screen out because of that.
5. Of course, given the educational and career way of though in US, pre-experience master is an exceptional rather than a norm in top US school, especially in business or any soft discipline. Master degree are most for earning funding for the department through expensive tuition. US is not UK/Canada/EU, they don't need a master for doing PhD, and they value MBA way higher than other MS in soft business. There are not much point for a top student to do a business MS instead of working, and thus top business school won't offer that generally.
i.e. it is rather difficult to find a good MS in US that the school is well regarded back in China (in business field) as place are really limited. I don't see any point to limiting oneself to US only in this case. (P.S. I consider school that are well regarded back in APAC and worth investing for a MS in soft business area is less than 20 in US. At least I won't put JHU or Boston or USC or equivalent into the basket since the tuition in US is too expensive. The education there can be nice, and be a valuable experience, but it is a luxury that cannot be justified from an $$ point of view) |
|