issue1 又写超时了，另外，想不出什么例子怎么办，听听大家意见。

鬼谷子UID: 159645

------题目------
We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
------正文------
From people whose views we share we get confidence, encouragement, and psychological satisfaction; from people whose views contradict our own we get new angles, fresh perspectives, and pertinent advices.  But excessive agreements would lead us to the morass of self-complacence; and extreme contradictions would weaken our determination of learning.  Thus we should fully recognize the potential danger of limiting our vision in one of the two sides.  And only through the approach of paying equal attention to both sides could we make further achievements in the process of learning.

Views and ideas from people agree with us may raise our confidence, strengthen our courage, and enhance our psychological satisfaction.  According to common sense and our everyday experience, the propensity to accept the ideas from people who agree with us rather than the opinions from people disagree with us associates strongly with the nature of human beings, for we are social animals and it is the inner instinct of us to seek for approval of others.  Imagine, what would you react if the work accomplished by your arduous efforts receives fierce criticism or not even a glance?  You would lose your strength to march in the long road of learning.  On the contrary, agreements may cause the feeling of being accepted and consented, thus we gain the psychological satisfaction which will impulse us to learn more.  Moreover, customarily, we tend to imitate and share ideas and behaviors from our parents, friends, classmates and so forth, who are in the same group of ours.  By this way we form knowledge of our own.

Not under all circumstances we can learn from people whose views we share.  Only base on the premises that all the views of our assenters are authentic and sincere, however, could we learn useful knowledge from them.  On condition that people consent and even flatter us for certain purposes which have nothing to do with learning, our learning would be hindered instead of motivated.  We would be possessed in the illusive pride and limited in a narrow bound of vision.  Consequently, we can see that the speaker’s assertion is incomplete and oversimplified.

Contradicting views and ideas could aware us of the mistakes and flaws in our work which we can not discover by ourselves, bring us fresh angles and perspectives, and then make our work mature and complete. Thereby through the discussion and competition both we and the people disagree with us could make advancements in our learning.  Debate on the same subject make it possible for human beings to make most of the achievements and advances on fields of science, technology, philosophy and the like.  If we see only on the one side of the coin, we could get only a partial and distorted knowledge and view which might mislead our learning.  

Also, contradiction may cause negative effects under certain conditions, especially when the debate becomes irrational denouncement or personal attack.  Then our confidence would be impaired by the criticisms and our learning inhibited by the stress excessive contradictions brings us.  Disagreements would be detrimental rather than beneficial to our learning under this circumstance.

Bias on each of the two sides is detrimental to our learning for that agreements and disagreements form a organic entity which can not be absolutely divided.  Over reliance on one side is blind and unwise.  Agreements base on no evidence are actually flatters; disagreements without rational reasons are reprimands.  We would be enmeshed in the web of self-contention sewed by ourselves and could not go ahead if we and blinded by the flatters; we would be frozen in the chilly night of darkness created by reprimands and became helpless and hopeless.  We must pay equal attentions on both sides to see the whole picture.

To sum up, ideas of people whose views we share and people whose views contradict our own play their respective role in our learning, and none of them should be neglected. Therefore, balance between both sides is needed.  And only through this way could we achieve the further goal in our process of learning.

唐净非UID: 171709

你的语言功底好厉害啊，写的真漂亮！！
论证也非常严密，不过我觉得出发点稍微低了些，也可能我比较偏好于老外那种往“大”方面写，觉得那样看起来总归让人觉得论述的比较深刻而非只停留在表面，当然纯属个人意见。
提供两例，我自己的提纲是支持作者的观点，从自然科学到社会学举例论证，自然科学举的是物理学界，物理学对同一问题的探讨往往存在非常激烈的争论，在对某一物理现象或实验的解释上，意见相同的可以相互补充使结论更完善，但当推广到在对这一问题讨论的整个发展上，只有不断的争论，不断的修正，不断的打破前人的理论，才能得以真正的前进。
在社会政治方面，在对待某一社会问题上，无论是社会学家还是政治家都会有激烈的争论，而这些争论只要是理性的，这种争论必然是良性的并且有利于社会发展的，民主国家正是基于此才能不断的完善和改进自身的弊端
以上只是个人意见，希望能对你有所帮助

唐净非UID: 171709

有空也帮我改一下吧，多谢了：）

鬼谷子UID: 159645

谢谢了
刚刚我也想到了几个例子
我也觉得我写的大部分都是个人的情况，至于社会，世界等“大”的情况没提到
回去改改

gra cie0213UID: 157500

From people whose views we share we get confidence, encouragement, and psychological satisfaction; from people whose views contradict our own we get new angles, fresh perspectives, and pertinent advices. But excessive agreements would lead us to the morass of self-complacence; and extreme contradictions would weaken our determination of learning. Thus we should fully recognize the potential danger of limiting our vision in one of the two sides. And only through the approach of paying equal attention to both sides could we make further achievements in the process of learning.

Views and ideas from people agree with us may raise our confidence, strengthen our courage, and enhance our psychological satisfaction. According to common sense and our everyday experience, the propensity to accept the ideas from people who agree with us rather than the opinions from people disagree with us associates strongly with the nature of human beings, for we are social animals and it is the inner instinct of us to seek for approval of others. Imagine, what would you react if the work accomplished by your arduous efforts receives fierce criticism or not even a glance? You would lose your strength to march in the long road of learning. On the contrary, agreements may cause the feeling of being accepted and consented, thus we gain the psychological satisfaction which will impulse us to learn more. Moreover, customarily, we tend to imitate and share ideas and behaviors from our parents, friends, classmates and so forth, who are in the same group of ours. By this way we form knowledge of our own.

Not under all circumstances we can can we learn from people whose views we share. Only base on the premises that all the views of our assenters are authentic and sincere, however, could we learn useful knowledge from them. On condition that people consent and even flatter us for certain purposes which have nothing to do with learning, our learning would be hindered instead of motivated. We would be possessed in the illusive pride and limited in a narrow bound of vision. Consequently, we can see that the speaker’s assertion is incomplete and oversimplified.

Contradicting views and ideas could aware us of the mistakes and flaws in our work which we can not discover by ourselves, bring us fresh angles and perspectives, and then make our work mature and complete. Thereby  through the discussion and competition both we and the people disagree with us could make advancements in our learning. Debate on the same subject make it possible for human beings to make most of the achievements and advances on fields of science, technology, philosophy and the like. If we see only on the one side of the coin, we could get only a partial and distorted knowledge and view which might mislead our learning. 这一段都是枯燥的说理, 有点weak, 最好能有证据支持一下

Also, contradiction may cause negative effects under certain conditions, especially when the debate becomes irrational denouncement or personal attack. Then our confidence would be impaired by the criticisms and our learning inhibited by the stress excessive contradictions brings us. Disagreements would be detrimental rather than beneficial to our learning under this circumstance.

Bias on each of the two sides is detrimental to our learning for that agreements and disagreements form a organic entity which can not be absolutely divided. Over reliance on one side is blind and unwise. Agreements base on no evidence are actually flatters; disagreements without rational reasons are reprimands. We would be enmeshed in the web of self-contention sewed by ourselves and could not go ahead if we and are blinded by the flatters; we would be frozen in the chilly night of darkness created by reprimands and became helpless and hopeless. We must pay equal attentions on both sides to see the whole picture.

To sum up, ideas of people whose views we share and people whose views contradict our own play their respective role in our learning, and none of them should be neglected. Therefore, balance between both sides is needed. And only through this way could we achieve the further goal in our process of learning.
语言很是不错, 结构也很清晰,但是感觉有些论点没有很好的支持.

另外,关于题目有一点不理解,请教一下:
我觉得learn from people whose views we share是不是不应该包括表扬激起学习动力这个方面?换句话说,也许表扬会刺激的是自学,那么和题目讲的是不是就不是一个范围了?

唐净非UID: 171709

前面说错了，是不同意作者的观点
觉得Issue1同18，122，209没什么太大区别，一篇文章稍加修改甚至原
封不动就能应付这4个题目了

noopiaUID: 170278

我想和几位讨论一下例子的问题，无论例子是大是小，如果都是凭空编造的可以吗？
如果都是身边的例子，或者不是老美知道的例子，应该也可以吧，我有点觉得不必找很多名人的例子来佐证，哪怕想到什么编什么也行吧。问题的关键是论证，不在于例子是否为人所知，如果老美天天看的都是这些例子，他们恐怕也不愿意多看。可是我也明白，身边的的小例子或者编造的例子在说服力上会差很多。
不过只是我偷懒的想法，因为不想背那些例子。不知你们的看法呢？

鬼谷子UID: 159645

6楼的前面哪句错了啊
我觉得1和122，209还是基本相似的，可是和18那道有不少差别吧，至少我没当成一类的写：）
7楼的我觉得编例子完全是可以的，FIT就行
而且记得新东方老师还提倡编例子呢，告诉我们如果是数据，要小数点后面两位之类的，尽量把例子编的可以乱真，嘿嘿

hattyUID: 141246

先占个座位吧

最近改过一篇issue1了，这个是第二篇，也许偶可以对照一下，比较系统的说 ：）

hattyUID: 141246

------题目------
We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
------正文------
From people whose views we share we get confidence, encouragement, and psychological satisfaction; from people whose views contradict our own we get new angles, fresh perspectives, and pertinent advices. But excessive agreements would lead us to the morass of self-complacence; and extreme contradictions would weaken our determination of learning. Thus we should fully recognize the potential danger of limiting our vision in one of the two sides. And only through the approach of paying equal attention to both sides could we make further achievements in the process of learning.

Views and ideas from people agree[用分词形式] with us may raise our confidence, strengthen our courage, and enhance our psychological satisfaction. According to common sense and our everyday experience, the propensity to accept the ideas from people who agree with us rather than the opinions from people disagree[疑惑，这种用法对么？做什么成分呢？] with us associates strongly with the nature of human beings, for we are social animals and it is the inner instinct of us to seek for approval of others. Imagine, what would you react if the work accomplished by your arduous efforts receives fierce criticism or not even[or even not] a glance? You would lose your strength to march in the long road of learning. On the contrary, agreements may cause the feeling of being accepted and consented, thus we gain the psychological satisfaction which will impulse us to learn more.[这个地方提到learn more，有效点题，好！] Moreover, customarily, we tend to imitate and share ideas and behaviors from our parents, friends, classmates and so forth, who are in the same group of ours. By this way we form knowledge of our own.[moreover以后说的不明白，想说什么呢？同more有关系么？]

Not under all circumstances we can learn from people whose views we share. Only base [还是应该是分词形式吧，做主语]on the premises that all the views of our assenters are authentic and sincere, however, could we learn useful knowledge from them. On condition that people consent and even flatter us for certain purposes which have nothing to do with learning, our learning would be hindered instead of motivated. We would be possessed in the illusive pride and limited in a narrow bound of vision. Consequently, we can see that the speaker’s assertion is incomplete and oversimplified.

Contradicting views and ideas could aware us of the mistakes and flaws in our work which we can not discover by ourselves, bring us fresh angles and perspectives, and then make our work mature and complete. Thereby through the discussion and competition both we and the people disagree with us[both后面we应该放在and后面] could make advancements in our learning. Debate on the same subject make [makes]it possible for human beings to make most of the achievements and advances on fields of science, technology, philosophy and the like. If we see only on the[去掉the] one side of the coin, we could get only a partial and distorted knowledge and view which might mislead our learning.

Also, contradiction may cause negative effects under certain conditions, especially when the debate becomes irrational denouncement or personal attack. Then our confidence would be impaired by the criticisms and our learning inhibited by the stress excessive contradictions brings [动词用法错误]us. Disagreements would be detrimental rather than beneficial to our learning under this circumstance.

Bias on each of the two sides is detrimental to our learning for that agreements and disagreements form a [an]organic entity which can not be absolutely divided. Over reliance on one side is blind[这个说法地道么？讨论一下] and unwise. Agreements base [还是一样的，用法？based on 才对吧？]on no evidence are actually flatters; disagreements without rational reasons are reprimands. We would be enmeshed in the web of self-contention sewed by ourselves and could not go ahead if we and blinded by the flatters; we would be frozen in the chilly night of darkness created by reprimands and became helpless and hopeless. We must pay equal attentions on[词组应该用to吧？] both sides to see the whole picture. [此处如果再强调一下to learn more就更好了]

To sum up, ideas of people whose views we share and people whose views contradict our own play their respective role in our learning, and none of them should be neglected. Therefore, balance between both sides is needed. And only through this way could we achieve the further goal in our process of learning.[结尾总结的好，而又简练，好]

[675词啊，好长的说。。。

鬼谷子用词很精道啊，variety充分体现，而且用的很准确，看了很享受。只是语法上有些小点需要在讨论一下，文章里我都列出来了。这篇属于我改的很快的一篇，不到3个小时，因为没有那么多不确定的用法，只查了几处字典，结果，你的用法是对的

逻辑上，我自己的提纲几乎同你一样，连想好的说法，理由什么的都同你的几乎一样，所以就不再多说了

结构上，几个body大段也比较清晰，进行了充分的展开和说明，还有对比。开头和总结也都很好！加油加油！]

鬼谷子UID: 159645

谢谢谢谢谢谢！
多谢hatty认真的修改
好多的地方的错误其实很明显的（现在看来），我也改了一遍了，怎么没发现？shy~~
看来这确实是个问题，不仔细，唉
我一定改进
争取在考试时候不犯这样的错误
再次感谢hatty提醒我对这些问题的注意
一起加油吧！

hattyUID: 141246

最初由 鬼谷子 发布
[B]谢谢谢谢谢谢！
多谢hatty认真的修改
好多的地方的错误其实很明显的（现在看来），我也改了一遍了，怎么没发现？shy~~
看来这确实是个问题，不仔细，唉
[/B]

我自己写作文时候（当然只写过一个），包括最后用word都查不出问题的说。。。

多看几次就好了

加油加油！

HAHAHAUID: 162566

看了我大受打击，能写这么好，搂住有没有看我的第一篇issue,（献丑哦），没话说，不是一个档次啊，一个月能练到你这水平吗？对了，这剩25天了
我都在考虑是不是放弃，

kenthyUID: 196686

下面是我的第一篇issue，请高手们帮帮忙！
我的第一篇issue

Along with the globalization and the sharp mushrooming both in economy and society, it becomes so common that many people are trying their best for the limited positions in their pursuing of careers. Consequentially, competition which seems to be the only way for a man or woman to survive in this fast changing world is in the focus of more and more people. Therefore the question that whether competition is ultimately beneficial or detrimental to our society triggers a series of reflection. In my opinion, there are both beneficial and detrimental facets of competition, but they are not strictly distinct from each other. Moreover, under certain circumstance, they can even transform into one another.

To begin with, competition either between persons or between countries is really effect in stimulating the development of the whole society. It is a simple notion that only with the unceasing challenge from other competitors is a person able to be alert all the time, always be up-to-date to the field he pursues, and make every possible changes in his behaviors to make himself competent comparing with other colleagues. This is just as Darwin pointed out in his evolutionism: only the fittest one can survive from drastic competition. Besides, many revolutionary breakthroughs are due to the benefit brought along by competition. For example, during both World War I and World War II, to compete with enemy states, or in other words to defeat others in order to survive, many countries made great effort in developing advanced (from the view of that time) weapons. At the same time, related techniques involving electronics, mechanics, biology, aeronautics and many other scientific fields were experienced a remarkable development. After the war, during the recovery of global economy, scientists and engineers made full use of these techniques formerly used for military to manufacturing and people’s daily consumptions. Thanks to these new techniques, or to exactly put it: the beneficial side of competition, our society saw a greater development than ever before.

On the other hand, as we know that each paper has two sides, competition is not always friendly to us, and contrarily it sometimes gives our society negative influence. Let us take an extreme situation for example: when competition is overemphasized by a certain society, many social problems will emerge from the seemingly disimpassioned social atmosphere. After a person has tried all he can but also does not have the opportunity to survive, in extreme despair, he may choose some ways else either to fulfill his instinctive desire to survive, saying committing a crime, or to make up his mind to commit suicide. Both these two choices can have detrimental effect both to himself, to his friends and relatives, and most important, to our society because he fails to be responsible for this society. However, actually we are not taking so stressful competition, but person who is vulnerable in spirit is apt to be underdog in our society. Moreover, also take wars for instances, this kind of international competition between countries brings overwhelming destructions to this planet, the losing of tens of millions of lives, the destroying of vast amount of human civilization, and even the shadow hiding deeply in people’s hearts after many decades of the war.

Having recognized both the advantages and disadvantages of competition, we must also see the possibilities of the transformation of these two. As mentioned above, under ruthless competition, people will more or less have some spiritual stresses, but for some optimists they have the ability to convert this stress into the drive to have more succeeds in their future career. Many international well-known enterprises has experienced this transformation and finally managed to their great achievements, saying Nintendo in Japan, or Hyundai in R. O. Korea.

To sum up, confronting with inescapable competition, what we can do is to make it clear both the beneficial and detrimental facets of competition. However, only this is far more than enough, to be better competent to survive in this fast changing society, we must also have strong will to outlive the strikes both from failures and frustration given by increasingly drastic competition for the sake of our responsibility for this society. What is more, it is equally important to learn how to transform these frustration and depression into the impetus to encourage us to achieve more in our career, which is also beneficial to the whole society.

kenthyUID: 196686

最初由 kenthy 发布
[B]下面是我的第一篇issue，请高手们帮帮忙！
我的第一篇issue

Along with the globalization and the sharp mushrooming both in economy and society, it becomes so co..

以下省略...... [/B]

发错了~1~
那是一篇范文，这才是我的滥作
226
It is hasty to say whether competition is more merited' than detrimental to our society. Only through competing, the one who is most eligible has developed, and then contribute all his or her merits to various hands of our lives. If someone thinks it is unique result of competition, he or she will find that there are also several disadvantages that cannot be overcome through competing. How do we deal with the difficult problem?

On one hand, through competing can we be instigated and learn more knowledge and technology actively in our daily life. With the development of economy, people need to know digest and assimilate different ones from kinds of subjects, so more and more people participate the make-up courses in their free time. People seem prefer touch new information so that they may make use of these contents to win the competition game, such as obtain satisfied position, acquire innumerous fortune, and so forth. And then competition is a feasible way to decline inferior commodities and wash out incompetent companies, so as to improve the quality of most business.
In conclusion, it is true that we always harvest what we want and briny every positive factor into play, we oblige' to answer a question we could not solve in along run, that is, why sometimes the efficiency of work is so low that we try to suspect whether competition mechanism is beneficial for us or not?

On the other hand, to analysis this problem and find the cause, a number of people from distinct countries of the world trend to consider the question from the other view. If a competition is fraught with adulteration and illegality, it will deteriorate normal order of society rather than advance and flourish. As we know, fair insure the progress of economy orderly, and it is the most significant factor of competition. If some people succeeded in a illegal approach and were increased by adulterating, other people will feel too morose to lose their hearts and never dedicate their energy to the society. If the false continued, more people will give up make effort to choose illegitimated mean to reach their goals.

It is complicated and terrible to tell the milieu, if all of us did not cope with the hard nut in a short while. Believing that, everyone knows that “nothing is fixed, everything is relative." Almost each part of one thing always influence with each other, so we have no reason to overlook the reverse of prosperity. Perhaps illicit competition will waste endless money, even exhaust our limited resources.
  
All in all, although a competition is followed with a few of shortcomings and improving, I still would like to think it will produce marvelous values and replace the old ones with the more proper. No matter how we plan to design the blueprint of our circumstance, people from distinguished class will deal with difficulties they face, if only everyone treats life, particularly ourselves more objectively. Wish you agreed with me.  
226是新东方教材上的编号