- 最后登录
- 2015-6-19
- 在线时间
- 122 小时
- 寄托币
- 44430
- 声望
- 22
- 注册时间
- 2004-3-12
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 42
- 精华
- 38
- 积分
- 13362
- UID
- 158017
   
- 声望
- 22
- 寄托币
- 44430
- 注册时间
- 2004-3-12
- 精华
- 38
- 帖子
- 42
|
HOVER : PLUNGE::
/ l* V% O ~. m: {- n0 ~- h
! D4 ?" o. ]. E! U0 L(A) float : swim
3 P# m* b, J6 F8 q2 D(B) hide : stalk
% c' p6 E( @" f(C) crouch : spring: t5 `4 B$ ~( j0 L4 q8 b0 z2 _
(D) glide : swerve9 y, q- {+ W2 J h5 a
(E) flutter : alight
! o0 o- }0 L. A6 O7 J! y6 a
) G; Y$ P; u- `! W这是NO题中的一道类比题,答案是C。它好像是说准备或者目的关系:盘旋是为俯冲准备=蹲伏是为跳起准备。但是我感觉这里的盘旋和俯冲以及蹲伏和跳起并不具备如此必然和直接的联系。
* O3 N( W1 G1 P* s! p0 W( T6 u: s5 h- i! m b
如果说盘旋和俯冲有联系的话,那也是在于有些鸟类在空中盘旋并寻找地上的猎物,当它发现猎物时,便会俯冲捕杀。如果说是准备关系的话,那么也只能说盘旋是为捕食寻找猎物做准备,俯冲本身是没有意义的,没有盘旋也可以俯冲。至于说蹲伏是为跳起准备似乎更为荒唐。人可能是因为冰冷、无力、疲乏等多种因素而蹲伏,而且跳起也不必定需要蹲伏。
' s7 I0 @8 Q) Z0 h: H
9 ?5 g; e- R; ?9 R4 I查了一下Webster把词义贴上来大家一起研究一下:) o, x0 |) G6 `, D' j
Hover:
/ H0 j% W9 A0 `3 f; w) @# |1 a : to hang fluttering in the air or on the wing b : to remain suspended over a place or object! L2 N: w. e7 e, l! a
2 a : to move to and fro near a place : fluctuate around a given point *unemployment hovered around 10%* b : to be in a state of uncertainty, irresolution, or suspense5 Y& b& _% ^1 z% n1 i
! w, M" ^0 x& E' c" c6 r; }Plunge: ~% P( u0 S, n; `/ R$ c
transitive senses
7 k7 u/ e2 w1 a! t1 : to cause to penetrate or enter quickly and forcibly into something! ?" T" C! I' j$ G
2 : to cause to enter a state or course of action usually suddenly, unexpectedly, or violently
* ~3 G# m0 y# D, w) aintransitive senses ) }& j' O% k( P/ t8 S. e2 E. m
1 : to thrust or cast oneself into or as if into water q$ @! l+ N5 g
2 a : to become pitched or thrown headlong or violently forward and downward; also : to move oneself in such a manner b : to act with reckless haste : enter suddenly or unexpectedly c : to bet or gamble heavily and recklessly, d6 e, c6 m- h0 e: p
3 : to descend or dip suddenly
0 k% Y5 b7 `8 H, T/ }% p3 |' I; E, u
( M* X1 }6 x% U( V$ L7 v7 `1 H说实话,从这里的释义我实在看不出这两个单词有什么关系,而且也无从发现所谓的盘旋是为俯冲准备之说的蛛丝马迹。唯一令我感到有些许感觉的词在于Plunge中所反复强调的suddenly的感觉。一下子想到了题目中D选项的Swerve一词。
9 o/ P r3 X/ r, { W4 r0 [, s" \/ B; b0 ]0 L2 \. M3 a8 u; V" U2 t
Swerve:
" h' f8 G. b; H# P0 Kintransitive senses : to turn aside abruptly from a straight line or course : DEVIATE& A2 g' }0 g; z" U9 Q
transitive senses : to cause to turn aside or deviate
' O) O' n. b+ `8 H7 T( n( U N P4 K4 n# i8 ^: }/ N1 g0 r; X6 d* t
如此而来我对这题的理解也只能是这样:Plunge是Hover过程中的突然变向,而Swerve是Glide过程中的突然变向。题目所凸现的都是这个突然的感觉。其实我感觉这样的搭配也不是很好,但相对于那个准备关系似乎更说得通一些,而且还能够从Webster上部分得到印证。不知道大家对这个题目的理解如何,希望能够共同探讨。; @! c7 }# S, Y q; l8 C( W
/ s! }' t( {; c' k& H还有一道反义的题目
7 }3 e* \) q7 q
' i7 }+ b7 g' b* b, o# RESCHEW:
3 @% d5 ]( R7 V0 ?+ E" L
) u: ~. I& `" P- V0 e(A) invest 6 M* ~9 k, i7 c% C: k- D, x0 Z& e
(B) consume
% W& n/ p% K8 ?4 I0 N; \. n0 g(C) maintain
2 p. W9 K, F" u, y4 N(D) condemn # c( h4 x+ x& N
(E) seek
/ o, b; l% y: m/ M
. c" ^- A# W; ^; g/ e6 @答案选择的是E。我查了Webster还是百思不得其解,望大家解惑。. Q+ \% G& I' a6 Z
Eschew4 G' g1 p, w: x+ L7 M
: to avoid habitually especially on moral or practical grounds : SHUN
2 k" D: K" a: O+ E$ J7 |! nsynonyms see ESCAPE4 Z/ l5 Q0 C$ N% f
% e/ D0 G# g' n( D5 X( ASeek
- F H" C, V1 Ztransitive senses
m9 g9 W6 Q. S3 S1 u$ a2 M Y6 n1 : to resort to : go to$ w: R# U. n( ]6 t
2 a : to go in search of : look for b : to try to discover
! O7 P4 w0 f3 t3 : to ask for : REQUEST *seeks advice*' H8 ]# M$ c$ ~; `3 S+ w! I
4 : to try to acquire or gain : aim at *seek fame*5 ?9 |) x( O# v/ x: J8 v# ?* z
5 : to make an attempt : TRY used with to and an infinitive *governments……seek to keep the bulk of their people contented D. M. Potter*
7 d- G0 r j, n. \intransitive senses S6 K% D. w' V+ G2 _
1 : to make a search or inquiry
" e7 C: n* v4 Z& k9 f9 }& h2 a : to be sought b : to be lacking *in critical judgment……they were sadly to seek Times Literary Supplement*
6 C3 X5 c" H9 T, f o S# V# ~' D5 ^
找到一道类似的反义是shun和seek actively,不过这里我感觉它的反义在于主动积极和被动逃避上。是不是单纯的seek也有这样的积极的意思???从Webster上的涵义来说,似乎这一点并不是太明显,◎-◎ |
|
|
If I'm who I am because I'm who I am and you're who you are because you are who you are, then I'm who I am and you're who you are.
If,on the other hand, I'm who I am because you're who you are, and if you are who you are because I'm who I am, then I'm not who I am and you're not who you are.
|