issue175 大家拿出十八般兵器批啊

不怕开水烫的猪UID: 187893

Issue175  第5篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！

写了一个晚上，开始一点思路都没有，郁闷死了！please pat

------题目------
It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual.

------正文------
In the history of science, many significant discoveries are attributed to single individual. It is true that those individuals might play the most important role in innovation; nevertheless, it is wrong to ignore the effort from a team. Not only do the details of innovation need teamwork, in fact, without the cooperation of others in a team, no innovation could have taken place.

What does the word "team" mean here? It should not be limited in members of the laboratory or those names listed under the title of a publication. The "team" should include all the persons who contribute to the innovation, a professor who gives some constructive ideas, a colleague who point out several fallacies, even an opponent who provides experience of failure.

No one is expert in all the disciplines. Facing infinite knowledge of the universe, any one, even the most famous scientist in the world has no choice but to admit to be ignorant. Innovation, which means breaking out from old traditions, is an arduous task needing the knowledge from many different disciplines. Diversified views from team members based on their respective specialty can compliment the deficiency of each others. For example, due to the complicated technique of CPU designing, any tiny advance in the computer science requires abundant knowledge both on hardware and software. Only by the ideas from programmers, or solely by the effort of circuit engineers, no great innovation can be achieved. Nowadays, IBM, Legend, and other world’s famous computer manufacturers, employ a great number of specialists with different background every year, to exploit new computer techniques. In other words, in a team, members who specialize in different areas can bring forward a more comprehensive idea for innovation. Consider BCS theory (an advanced theory on super conduction) for example; three people won Nobel Prize for it, Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer. Bardeen was an experienced physicist, a former Nobel Prize winner; Cooper was good at theoretical models, and presented the famous “Cooper pair” concept; Schrieffer was a young scientist then, with great passion and vigor. The success of the theory should not be ascribed to any individual of them but the team as a whole.

On the other hand, people mistakenly considered some historic innovation as the contribution of one individual. If asked to cite some elites in the history who brought innovation on their own, one might give the example of L.V. de Broglie, who presented wave-particle dualism, a method to explain the principles of micro-world. Without questions, Broglie’s unique perception is the key factor of the innovation; however, it is rash to attribute the success to him alone. Before the new concept was established, the debate between wave theory and particle theory lasted for several years, during which many elaborate experiments have been conducted. Broglie’s innovation was based on the effort of many theoretical and experimental scientists, who might contribute more to the theory. When it comes to political field, innovation also could not survive without a team. For instance, “one country, two systems” theory, presented by Deng Xiaoping, successfully solved the disputed issue on Hong Kong in 1997 and Macao in 1999. Although Deng Xiaoping played a crucial role in this plan, he attributed the success to the wisdom of the mass.  

To sum up, teamwork is indispensable to innovation. Therefore, in education, while the stories of some outstanding innovative figures are adored by students, it is necessary to emphasize the importance of teamwork, since no great advance could take place without cooperation.

不怕开水烫的猪UID: 187893

被挤到了第二页

自己顶一下！

花之颜色UID: 187195

先给teamwork下了个定义，这种思路挺不错的，如果成立的话，就没什么问题了吧。感觉论证的挺不错的呵呵～发现这么一来，所有的创新都是集体劳动结果了，因为我们的基础知识都是从过去累积得到的啊，而任何创新都得用的说，那这样的话，Nobel奖搬给谁好哪？如果从这个角度想，好像第二个论点有点立不住脚啊～第三段第五行有个笔误compliment？应该是complement。还有个别地方好像应该用复数，different backgrounds～其他的地方留给别人拍吧，俺的水平有限，不过这个题目是挺难写的，我前几天想提纲的时候一点思路也没，参考了好多人的意见，发现大部分人都写支持，第一次看见有人写反对，楼主这种创新意识赞一个～偶觉得反对好像更难写：（

不怕开水烫的猪UID: 187893

非常感谢！

我倒是看这个题的第一眼的时候就想反对他，还没想过支持该怎么写呢？呵呵。

我写body1的时候还觉得自己的论点站得住脚，等到body2, 我自己都觉得是在狡辩了。感觉这种先自己定义题目中关键词的方法还是慎用，除非思维非常严谨。否则像我这篇，就显得太牵强了。

再列个支持的提纲吧，考试的时候可不敢这么写。

1  历史上很多伟大创新都超出了同时代人的认识水平，所以也得不到team的支持。
  Copernicus and Mendel

2  就算在一个team里工作，往往创新来自于个别人，其他人都是辅助工作
  Manhattan project  也可以再劳驾小平同志一次。

还有什么论点和例子啊，大家帮忙想想

谢谢！

花之颜色UID: 187195

我看别人写的,说team会互相影响，降低创新性

kkytUID: 188814

如果说我比别人看得远，
那是因为我是站在巨人的肩膀上: If I have seen farther than others, it is because I have stood on the shoulders of giants. --Newton
有人说不要用中国的例子