ISSUE180 兄弟们打啊

冥界星灿UID: 184746

180"Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system because moral behavior cannot be legislated."

The author asserts that laws and the legal system cannot solve many modern society’s problems in that moral behavior cannot be legislated. The stated position do exist sometimes but as far as I am concerned, I hold the view that morality are one of the foundations of legislation thereby moral behavior are legitimate most times.

Admittedly, in some circumstance, a well-done(大家帮找个替换词?) relationship between morality and laws are not founded. It is possible a moral behavior is against the law, whereas a flagrant behavior is authorized by the laws. The supporting examples may concern the holocaust in Nazi Germany during the Second World War. In Denmark, in spite of the German occupation, the Danish people illegally smuggled most of Jews to safety in Sweden. A German industrialist named Oskar Schindler illegally protected Jews working for him in Poland. On the other hand, however, German SS officer Klaus Barbie known as “the Butcher of Lyons” because of his work authorized by Nazi laws in occupied France during World War II was involved in deporting thousands of Jews to extermination camps in Poland and murdering members of the French Resistance movement. It is possible in certain time and place laws are disengaged from mortality according to all kinds of reasons.

For most times, laws are not only derived from but according to citizen's morality system. A behavior allow by law in some nations is most likely to have no collision with the local morality system and vice versa. What comes immediately to mind is in 2001 The Netherlands became the first country to legalize same-sex marriages, giving same-sex couples the same rights that heterosexual couples have depict the public accepted opinions to homosexuality. Another supporting example at hand involves a custom in Arab countries where the exposure of a woman's skin in front of a strange man is viewed immoral thereby forbidding by the law. Simply put, in most circumstance, the law and moral system have the same judgments concerning human behavior.

Last but not least, the communication between laws and morality makes much sense to the stability and development to both systems. With the quickening rhythm of modern society, a host of problems are on the rise. To some extent, it is impossible to legislate all phenomenons at the point it takes place but legislation according to human moral system is of a increasing importance. A convincing example at hand is criminations on computers and through internet. All countries' legislation institutions are busy legislating against this kind of criminations. On the other hands, our moral system is at a vulnerable place in this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement. Without the bound of the law system, the moral system is apt to at the cross and deflects its original purpose and the goods of human beings. For instance, the pandemic of AIDS in some nations of Africa is bound to the moral corruption to some extent. Only by valid communication can both systems keep stability and develop with efficiency ultimately exert virtuous.

As the case stands, in most times, the legislation keeps a compact contact with the moral sense hold by public. And the laws system must adjust itself to new changes and satisfy the demand of the development of the society in the direction of moral sense. The communication and interplay between laws and moral system are reciprocity to both and eventually to the human society.

poohUID: 146994

The author asserts that laws and the legal system cannot solve many modern society’s problems in that moral behavior cannot be legislated. 不要抄原提的语句！The stated positionposition不合适，改成occasion do -->does exist sometimes but as far as I am concerned, I hold the view that morality are one of the foundations of legislation thereby moral behavior are is legitimate most times.moral behavior is legitimate 的意思是道德行为是合法的，这里跟题目不是一回事儿，题目让讨论的是道德问题是否可以用法律来解决下文因此也不是很对题，如果你写法律跟道德是否一致就偏了

Admittedly, in some circumstance, a well-done(大家帮找个替换词? certain ) relationship between morality and laws are not founded. It is possible a moral behavior is against the law, whereas a flagrant behavior is authorized by the laws. The supporting examples may concern the holocaust in Nazi Germany during the Second World War. In Denmark, in spite of the German occupation, the Danish people illegally smuggled most of Jews to safety in Sweden. A German industrialist named Oskar Schindler illegally protected Jews working for him in Poland. On the other hand, however, German SS officer Klaus Barbie known as “the Butcher of Lyons” because of his work authorized by Nazi laws in occupied France during World War II was involved in deporting thousands of Jews to extermination camps in Poland and murdering members of the French Resistance movement. It is possible in certain time and place laws are disengaged from mortality according to all kinds of reasons.

For most times, laws are not only derived from but according to citizen's morality system. A behavior allow by law in some nations is most likely to have no collision with the local morality system and vice versa. What comes immediately to mind is in 2001 The Netherlands became the first country to legalize same-sex marriages, giving same-sex couples the same rights that heterosexual couples have depict the public accepted opinions to homosexuality. Another supporting example at hand involves a custom in Arab countries where the exposure of a woman's skin in front of a strange man is viewed immoral thereby forbidding by the law. Simply put, in most circumstance, the law and moral system have the same judgments concerning human behavior.

Last but not least, the communication between laws and morality makes much sense to the stability and development to both systems. With the quickening rhythm of modern society, a host of problems are on the rise. To some extent, it is impossible to legislate all phenomenons at the point it takes place but legislation according to human moral system is of a increasing importance. A convincing example at hand is criminations on computers and through internet. All countries' legislation institutions are busy legislating against this kind of criminations. On the other hands, our moral system is at a vulnerable place in this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement. Without the bound of the law system, the moral system is apt to at the cross and deflects its original purpose and the goods of human beings. For instance, the pandemic of AIDS in some nations of Africa is bound to the moral corruption to some extent. Only by valid communication can both systems keep stability and develop with efficiency ultimately exert virtuous.

As the case stands, in most times, the legislation keeps a compact contact with the moral sense hold by public. And the laws system must adjust itself to new changes and satisfy the demand of the development of the society in the direction of moral sense. The communication and interplay between laws and moral system are reciprocity to both and eventually to the human society.

冥界星灿UID: 184746

居然是pooh姐姐亲自改的，感动——

居然写跑题了，郁闷！

本来是想先批because后面的从句，以证明原因不成立的方式证明观点不成立的，现在看来好像是在舍本逐末。简直就是精神错乱。

大家切切引以为戒！

我下去改了，改好后大家有幸趣的接着批（这下不敢用打了，怕pooh姐姐说我恐怖主义暴力倾向，哈哈）

再次感谢！！！

bcomerUID: 182621

180"Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system because moral behavior cannot be legislated."

这个题目的意思是：
许多现代社会的问题不能被法律或立法系统所解决，因为道德行为不能被立法？？？ :)

冥界星灿UID: 184746

因为道德行为是无法用法律约束的

冥界星灿UID: 184746

改了三个小时，连饭还没吃，大家知道什么叫蜗牛爬了吧！该怎么办啊？

还是WORD系统傻了，没检查拼写和语法，自己看了两遍，大家要看错的多就先放一放，要是错的多的话，我明天个机子检查完会再贴，到时兄弟们再看，我很怕耽误大家时间。如果对自己的纠错能力比较自信的话且不怕看低级错误，那我也不拦着。^_^

The auther asserts that many laws and the legal system cannot solve many problems raised in mordern society in that moral behavior cannot be legislated. The stated occasion does exist sometimes but as far as I am concerned, I hold the view that moral behavior are legitimate most times and thus can answer most problems raised in modern society.

Addmittedly, in some circumstances, a certain relatonship between morality and laws are not founded, therefore, laws and legal system does have difficulty in solving raised problems. The supporting examples may concern the holocaust in Nazi Germany during the Second World War. A German industrialist named Oskar Schindler illegally protected Jews working for him in Poland. On the other hand, howevevr, German SS officer Klaus Barbie known as “the Butcher of Lyons” because of his work authorizd by Nazi laws in occupied France during World War II was involved in deporting thousands of Jews to extermination camps in Poland and murdering members of the French Resistance movement. Both of the problems cited cannot be solved by laws and legal system in that era. In certain times and places, laws are disengaged from motality according to many kinds of reasons, not to mention solving problems raised.

For most times, laws and legal system react to the citizens' behaviors with the judgment provided by morality system. Humicide, stealing, dacoity, for instance, are all immoral activities and thus forbidden by laws. Another convincing example at hand involves a costom in Arab countries where the exposure of a woman's skin in front of a strange man is viewed immoral thereby being forbided by the laws. On the other hand, however, a behavior allowed by laws is most likely to have no collision with the local morality system. What comes immediatelly to mind is in 2001 The Netherlands became the first country to legalize same-sex marriages, giving same-sex couples the same rights that heterosexual couples have depict the public accepted opinions to homosexuality. The pass of this law no doubtly depicts that there is no discrimination in Netherlands against homosexuality and give the appearing problem a certain answer. Simply put, in most circumstance, the law and moral system have the same judgment concerning human behavior by which the laws and legal system solve almost all kinds of problems raised.

Finally, although the modern society is accelerating its development paces and a host of problems are on the rise at the meantime, the laws and legal system is adjusting itself in order to solve the appearing problems on the basis of modern socirty's moral system. An convincing example at hand is criminations on computers and throught internet. All countries' legislation institutions are busy legslating against this kind of ciminations and many laws successfully take into actions as a result. Therefore, even the laws are not capable to solve certain appearing problems, it will sooner or later. To support this point, we should take a look at Germany after the Second World War. The industrialist Oskar SChindler has received his honor from all over the world Whereas Klaus Barbie was put into jail where he spend his later life. As time elapses, all things receive what it deserves before laws.

As the case stands, in most times, the legislation keeps a compact contact with the moral sense hold by public therefore can solve most of the problems provided. With the quickening rhythm of modern society, the laws system must adjust itself to new changes and satisfy the the demand of the development of the society in the direction of moral sense. No system can solve all problems validity but the laws and legal system can answer most of the questions raised in modern society.

LSDUID: 157855

呵呵，占座了！

LSDUID: 157855

The auther asserts that many laws and the legal system cannot solve many problems raised in mordern society in that moral behavior cannot be legislated. The stated occasion does exist sometimes but as far as I am concerned, I hold the view that moral behavior are legitimate most times and thus can answerresolve most problems raised in modern society.

Addmittedly, in some circumstances, a certain relatonship between morality and laws are not founded, therefore, laws and legal system does have difficulty in solving raised problems. The supporting examples may concern the holocaust in Nazi Germany during the Second World War. A German industrialist named Oskar Schindler illegally protected Jews working for him in Poland. On the other hand, howevevr, German SS officer Klaus Barbie known as “the Butcher of Lyons” because of his work authorizd by Nazi laws in occupied France during World War II was involved in deporting thousands of Jews to extermination camps in Poland and murdering members of the French Resistance movement. Both of the problems cited cannot be solved by laws and legal system in that era. In certain times and places, laws are disengaged from motality according to many kinds of reasons, not to mention solving problems raised.这个例子说的是法律的不健全引起的后果，和题目有什么关系呢？而且也不是modern society的例子阿

For most times, laws and legal system react to the citizens' behaviors with the judgment provided by morality system. Humicide, stealing, dacoity, for instance, are all immoral activities and thus forbidden by laws. Another convincing example at hand involves a costom in Arab countries where the exposure of a woman's skin in front of a strange man is viewed immoral thereby being forbided by the laws. On the other hand, however, a behavior allowed by laws is most likely to have no collision with the local morality system. What comes immediatelly to mind is in 2001 The Netherlands became the first country to legalize same-sex marriages, giving same-sex couples the same rights that heterosexual couples have depict the public accepted opinions to homosexuality. The pass of this law no doubtly depicts that there is no discrimination in Netherlands against homosexuality and give the appearing problem a certain answer. Simply put, in most circumstance, the law and moral system have the same judgment concerning human behavior by which the laws and legal system solve almost all kinds of problems raised. 个人觉得这段写得和你上一段有点矛盾的说

Finally, although the modern society is accelerating its development paces and a host of problems are on the rise at the meantime, the laws and legal system is adjusting itself in order to solve the appearing problems on the basis of modern socirty's moral system. An convincing example at hand is criminations on computers and throught internet. All countries' legislation institutions are busy legslating against this kind of ciminations and many laws successfully take into actions as a result. Therefore, even the laws are not capable to solve certain appearing problems, it will sooner or later. To support this point, we should take a look at Germany after the Second World War. The industrialist Oskar SChindler has received his honor from all over the world Whereas Klaus Barbie was put into jail where he spend his later life. As time elapses, all things receive what it deserves before laws.这段例子还可以，但是论证和例子结合的还不够

As the case stands, in most times, the legislation keeps a compact contact with the moral sense hold by public therefore can solve most of the problems provided. With the quickening rhythm of modern society, the laws system must adjust itself to new changes and satisfy the the demand of the development of the society in the direction of moral sense. No system can solve all problems validity but the laws and legal system can answer most of the questions raised in modern society.
还有一些词语的拼写错误，请楼主自己用word改正:p
ADD OIL

冥界星灿UID: 184746

2月7号考试？这种时候还给我批，谢谢姐姐，我这厢有礼了

BODY1. Nazi 的法律因为与道德违背，所以不能解决社会问题（这个思路好像有点绕？反正是怪）。不是modern, 一针见血。我当时想的是这个modern 当成了同时期的，因为每个时期在当时都是modern. 这个思路更怪。怎么这样一分析好像我是什么思维另类的怪胎，呵呵

BODY2. 大多数情况下因为道德与法律统一，所以可以解决社会问题。
但写的时候是不是没有突出大多数时候这一概念？所以跑到了自相矛盾的边缘。下次会注意，谢谢姐姐提醒：）

BODY3. 论证例子结合不够。是因为论证过程过于简化，除了论点就是例子的原因吧？
的确，论证写的很不丰满那。

谢谢指教，发现自己真的狠有待提高，再次感谢

另，你的作文也不要考得太帅了，要是老美发现中国学生写文章比他们自己还强说不定明年又搞一更变态得考试难为中国广大青少年儿童。您老人家是没问题了，也为下几届师弟师妹们想一想，他们才祖国花朵啊，禁不起美帝国主义无情蹂躏的。啊？^_^

bcomerUID: 182621

zhan zuo^^

bcomerUID: 182621

The author asserts that many laws and the legal system cannot solve many problems raised in modern society in that moral behavior cannot be legislated. The stated occasion does exist sometimes but as far as I am concerned, I hold the view that moral behavior are legitimate most times and thus can answer most problems raised in modern society.

Admittedly, in some circumstances, a certain relationship between morality and laws are not founded, therefore, laws and legal system does (do?) have difficulty in solving raised problems. The supporting examples may concern the holocaust in Nazi Germany during the Second World War. A German industrialist named Oskar Schindler illegally protected Jews working for him in Poland. On the other hand, however, German SS officer Klaus Barbie known as “the Butcher of Lyons” because of his work authorized by Nazi laws in occupied France during World War II was involved in deporting thousands of Jews to extermination camps in Poland and murdering members of the French Resistance movement. Both of the problems cited cannot be solved by laws and legal system in that era. In certain times and places, laws are disengaged from morality according to many kinds of reasons, not to mention solving problems raised.

For most times, laws and legal system react to the citizens' behaviors with the judgment provided by morality system. Homicide, stealing, dacoit, for instance, are all immoral activities and thus forbidden by laws. Another convincing example at hand involves a custom in Arab countries where the exposure of a woman's skin in front of a strange man is viewed immoral thereby being forbidden by the laws. On the other hand, however, a behavior allowed by laws is most (more?) likely to have no collision with the local morality system. What comes immediately to mind is in 2001 The Netherlands became the first country to legalize same-sex marriages, giving same-sex couples the same rights that heterosexual couples have depict the public accepted opinions to homosexuality. The pass of this law no doubtly depicts that there is no discrimination in Netherlands against homosexuality and give the appearing problem a certain answer. Simply put, in most circumstance, the law and moral system have the same judgment concerning human behavior by which the laws and legal system solve almost all kinds of problems raised.

Finally, although the modern society is accelerating its development paces and a host of problems are on the rise at the meantime, the laws and legal system is adjusting itself in order to solve the appearing problems on the basis of modern society’s moral system. A convincing example at hand is criminations on computers and through internet. All countries' legislation institutions are busy legislating against this kind of criminations and many laws successfully take into actions as a result. Therefore, even the laws are not capable to solve certain appearing problems, it will (be?) sooner or later. To support this point, we should take a look at Germany after the Second World War. The industrialist Oskar Schindler has received his honor from all over the world whereas Klaus Barbie was put into jail where he spends his later life. As time elapses, all things receive what it deserves before laws (the law).

As the case stands, in most times, the legislation keeps a compact contact with the moral sense hold by public therefore can solve most of the problems provided. With the quickening rhythm of modern society, the laws system must adjust itself to new changes and satisfy the demand of the development of the society in the direction of moral sense. No system can solve all problems validity but the laws and legal system can answer most of the questions raised in modern society.

法律面前人人平等中，使用的是BEFORE THE LAW：）
The law cannot make all men equal, but they are all equal before the law.

改的不多，主要是在WORD环境下修改了你的拼写错误：）
非拼写错误的修改已经用变色工具标明了:)
觉得写的挺好的
学习ING……
另外想问morality和moral有什么区别啊？

bcomerUID: 182621

可怜的 冥界

被LSD批成这个样子：）