issue29 写的不好，大家帮忙指点指点啊，砸我砖者我必砸之！！

flyingwindUID: 189320

Issue29  
------题目------
Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy.
------正文------
Should public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy when they seek a public role? In my view, the answer is of course no doubt. Their public roles force them to be scrutinized far more than common people, especially considering both the earnest psychology of the public to know curiously what their heroes are behind the images as usual and the media which even precipitate the possibility for the masses to reach their inquiring end.

The main reason why I think that the public figures should expect the exposition of their privacy lays in the interest the public exhibit to know further whatever related to the famous public figures. Everyday, the famous public figures occupy many, if not most, of our everyday life. One can look no more than the public media--news papers, broadcasting, internet, TV screen, etc to see it is the case. We are accustomed to seeing what those figures are on the floor. But as to their private life, it is also appealing to the masses who might think the public figures' lives must be more interesting than common people. Furthermore, the trust in what the public perform is more believable than common people exacerbate the exposition of their lives. The ads in the media showing the proposals of the public figures indicate it true. While the public wish to keep their influence to the public and limit the showing to the extent they are willing, public's comparison and appreciation often extend to a broader extent involving their private lives. It is just under this psychological sense the public are willing to peer the actions of the public figure, no matter how private those actions are to those figures.

At the same time, the media even propel the masses to peer easily and immediately. As we all know, media serve to pursue market profits for the shareholders. Understandably, it is the demand of the public to know all-inclusively about the public figure of the society that determines that the media prey on the public figure in almost every aspect in their lives. For worse or better, the media even eager to find some negative news of the public figures which might taint their routine images. For instance, The media pay close heed to the divorce of the famous basketball star--Michael Jordan, the Royal Love Affair or Tragic Triangle of Charles and Camilla, whether the death of Princess Diana is a murder or not, and how Cliton sexual scandal brings hot issue about whether a effective leader should hold the highest ethical and moral standard. I do not doubt this stuff related to the public figure worthwhile to be dug out, but the extreme attention to them seems to appeal the public eyeballs than the stuff itself.

Finally, in some realms especially in the show business in principle the public stars are willing to show some of their privacy to some extent. They know the laws of the entertainment that some extents of exposition help them to be the cynosures of the public. More often than not we can see so-called exposition of the entertainment star showing their private stuff--such as what styles of men or women she/he love most and what kind of production most appeal them most. They of course do not let the public know everything about themselves and their showing is definitely controlled well. Nevertheless, what diets the public result nothing but a boom for the public to peer further and the media follow the market trend and always fight for detailed information.

To sum up, when the figures choose to be under more observation as public roles, they should expect that they will lose some, if not most, of their privacy. The masses have the interior impetus to know privacy of their famous few and the media facilitate it to be realized. Even some extent of self-exposition can result in more and more attention which the public figure cannot imagine. In short, while the public figures choose to be in the focus of the masses, they definitely lose at least some of their privacy which they should expect.

ETS小样很嚣张啊UID: 191129

说实话，你的第一段我看了10分钟也没搞懂。
我的英文程度不高，但是我想小小声的问一下：
In my view, the answer is of course no doubt.
好象最后也没说到底是yes还是no吧
Their public roles force them to be scrutinized far more than common people
我觉得more后面是不是少了个副词？比如thoroughly
media which even precipitate the possibility for the masses to reach their inquiring end.
这句话什么意思？

ETS小样很嚣张啊UID: 191129

我写的：
In my view, the answer is an unequivocal yes. As public roles, they are bound to be scrutinized more thoroughly by the media, which strives to satisfy the public's curiosity about celebrities' behind-the-scenes lives.
大家一起讨论讨论

flyingwindUID: 189320

no doubt不就是“是”的意思吗？就是肯定上面的疑问的嘛

最初由 ETS小样很嚣张啊 发布
[B]我写的：
In my view, the answer is an unequivocal yes. As public roles, they are bound to be scrutinized more thoroughly by the media, which strives to satisfy..

以下省略...... [/B]

你写的挺好 的！

ETS小样很嚣张啊UID: 191129

最初由 flyingwind 发布
[B]no doubt不就是“是”的意思吗？就是肯定上面的疑问的嘛



以下省略...... [/B]

不是吧？

no doubt
adv.
无疑地

也就相当于undoubtedly

ETS小样很嚣张啊UID: 191129

The main reason why I think that the public figures should expect the exposition of their privacy lays in the interest the public exhibit to know further whatever related to the famous public figures. Everyday, the famous public figures occupy many, if not most, of our everyday life. One can look no more than the public media--news papers, broadcasting, internet, TV screen, etc to see it is the case.你是想说one need look no further than吧？ We are accustomed to see what those figures are on the floor. But as to their private life, it is also appealing to the masses who might think the public figures' lives must be more interesting than common people. Furthermore, the trust in what the public perform is more believable than common people exacerbate the exposition of their lives. The ads in the media showing the proposals of the public figures indicate it true. While the public wish to keep their influence to the public and limit the showing to the extent they are willing, public's comparison and appreciation often extend to a broader extent involving their private lives. It is just under this psychological sense the public are willing to peer the actions of the public figure, no matter how private those actions are to those figures. 今天第一次读别人的文章，感觉好奇怪啊

flyingwindUID: 189320

最初由 ETS小样很嚣张啊 发布
[B]不是吧？
no doubt
adv.
以下省略...... [/B]

的确，no doubt 是 adv.
无疑地，不容怀疑地；很可能地
eg。No doubt you would like a drink. 毫无疑问你是喜欢喝一杯了。

但是也可以看成no+doubt，其中doubt是n.  例如：
doubt    n.
1.怀疑；疑虑；未确定
There is no doubt that he is guilty.     毫无疑问，他是有罪的。

I have (my) doubts about whether he is the best man for the job.
我怀疑他是否做这项工作的最好人选。

2不信任；不相信
We have no doubt of his ability.   我们相信他的能力。

这里面都有no doubt如果是adv去掉不影响整个句子的表达，但是你看去了句子就不通了!

LSDUID: 157855

占座！

naiba369UID: 131655

呵呵，讨论很热烈吗，呵呵

占座了

flyingwindUID: 189320

占坐的要补上票哦，不然要罚款哦！！！

naiba你快发新作啊，我有一吨砖头砸你呢！！！

LSD快考拉，加油！！

ETS小样很嚣张啊UID: 191129

你在7楼说的对
但我还是认为In my view,the answer is of course no doubt. 这句话不通。
理越辩越明，召唤版主~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

还有，我刚才在想，作者把他的中文思想转换成英文，看文章的中国人再把英文转换回中文思想，这两次转换之间不知会多少信息丢失。

LSDUID: 157855

Issue29
------题目------
Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy.
------正文------
Should public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy when they seek a public role? In my view, the answer is of course no doubt[这句怎么这么别扭呢？]. Their public roles force them to be scrutinized far more than common people, especially considering both the earnest psychology[curiosity] of the public to know [curiously去掉] what their heroes are behind the images as usual and the media which even precipitate the possibility for the masses to reach their inquiring end.

[The main reason why I think that the public figures should expect the exposition of their privacy lays in the interest the public exhibit to know further whatever related to the famous public figures.] Everyday, the famous public figures occupy many, if not most[这个是什么意思？], of our everyday life. One can look no more than the public media--news papers, broadcasting, internet, TV screen, etc to see it is the case. We are accustomed to see what those figures are on the floor. But as to their private life, it is also appealing to the masses who might think the public figures' lives must be more interesting than common people. Furthermore, the trust in what the public perform is more believable than common people exacerbate the exposition of their lives. The ads in the media showing the proposals of the public figures indicate it true. While the public wish to keep their influence to the public and limit the showing to the extent they are willing, public's comparison and appreciation often extend to a broader extent involving their private lives. It is just under this psychological sense the public are willing to peer the actions of the public figure, no matter how private those actions are to those figures. [全事说理，没有例子，不能让人信服阿，而且总感觉句子很怪，呵呵，可能是个人语言习惯问题把]

At the same time,[ the media even propel the masses to peer easily and immediately.] As we all know, media serve to pursue market profits for the shareholders. Understandably, it is the demand of the public to know all-inclusively about the public figure of the society that determines that[这里两个that用得不好啊] the media prey on the public figure in almost every aspect in their lives. For worse or better[better or worse], the media even eager to find some negative news of the public figures which might taint their routine images. For instance, The media pay close heed to the divorce of the famous basketball star--Michael Jordan, the Royal Love Affair or Tragic Triangle of Charles and Camilla, whether the death of Princess Diana is a murder or not, and how Cliton sexual scandal brings hot issue about whether a effective leader should hold the highest ethical and moral standard. I do not doubt this stuff related to the public figure worthwhile to be dug out, but the extreme attention to them seems to appeal the public eyeballs than the stuff itself.[这段说到最后怎么和ts脱节了呢？]

Finally, [in some realms especially in the show business in principle the public stars are willing to show some of their privacy to some extent.] They know the laws of the entertainment that some extents of exposition help them to be the cynosures of the public. More often than not we can see so-called exposition of the entertainment star showing their private stuff--such as what styles of men or women she/he love most and what kind of production most appeal them most. They of course do not let the public know everything about themselves and their showing is definitely controlled well. Nevertheless, what diets the public result nothing but a boom for the public to peer further and the media follow the market trend and always fight for detailed information.[最后这句好复杂阿，用了这么多and，没看懂]

To sum up, when the figures choose to be under more observation as public roles, they should expect that they will lose some, if not most, of their privacy. The masses have the interior impetus to know privacy of their famous few and the media facilitate it to be realized. Even some extent of self-exposition can result in more and more attention which the public figure cannot imagine. In short, while the public figures choose to be in the focus of the masses, they definitely lose at least some of their privacy which they should expect.
[建议楼主坝句子写得尽量简单些，这样意思比较明确阿]
[加油，共同进步！]

ally00lingUID: 178366

结构和ts都够明确，语言有点复杂，我只有几个建议：
1  be accustomed to doing
2 body 2的ts 很明确了，举了例子自然往上扣啊！
3 body 3楼主说有些人自愿暴露隐私，其实不如顺着你说的“They know the laws of the entertainment ”往下，力图表达出明星们也是迫于生计，他们自己干这行就应该明白这个道理，而不是着重于他们是自愿的。

一家之说，希望交流一下 :D

flyingwindUID: 189320

the answer is of course no doubt[这句怎么这么别扭呢？]
这个我的理解见上面和“小样嚣张”的讨论，有可能是我理解错了。但是我想确认一下，哪个语法好的？

if not most[这个是什么意思？]
即使不是大多数。小让步

but the extreme attention to them seems to appeal the public eyeballs than the stuff itself.[这段说到最后怎么和ts脱节了呢？]
media 的过度关注似乎只是为了吸引眼球（前面说了要提高销量），而不是关注事态本身。
这个我觉得是总结点段类的TS啊。  我理解错了？~~~


建议楼主坝句子写得尽量简单些，这样意思比较明确阿
呵呵，好！

加油，共同进步！ 你快考拉！

flyingwindUID: 189320

1 be accustomed to doing
呵呵,shying

2 body 2的ts 很明确了，举了例子自然往上扣啊！
我里面有例子,不信再看?例子不一定提出啥人叫啥名字吧

3 body 3楼主说有些人自愿暴露隐私，其实不如顺着你说的“They know the laws of the entertainment ”往下，力图表达出明星们也是迫于生计，他们自己干这行就应该明白这个道理，而不是着重于他们是自愿的。
我是想说自愿说出点,但是钩起人们更大的兴趣了.不过你的"明星们也是迫于生计，他们自己干这行就应该明白这个道理"的确可以补充近来!