查看: 2125|回复: 8

[i习作temp] 对一道题的疑问__教育类issue40 [复制链接]

G猫
UID: 192988

Rank: 4

声望: 2
寄托币: 1980
注册时间: 2005-1-21
精华: 3
帖子: 6

发表于 2005-2-13 23:17:58 |显示全部楼层

40. "Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem."
我们不应该仅仅关注学者和研究者的著作能否对社会做出贡献。更重要的是关注他们如何追求实现自己的兴趣，无论那些兴趣显得是多么的非同寻常。
少数和多数之科学家

这个翻译是不是有问题?
这个题目的意思是不是说学者不应该考虑是否为社会做贡献,
而应该追求自己的兴趣?
:confused:

www.mumu-home.com

使用道具举报

nightsky2004
UID: 155946

初级会员

Rank: 3 Rank: 3

声望: 0
寄托币: 1557
注册时间: 2004-2-19
精华: 0
帖子: 0

发表于 2005-2-13 23:57:49 |显示全部楼层

40"Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem."
对待学者和研究人员的评价不应该取决于他们的工作是否对整个社会有所贡献。而应该是看他们怎样为了自己的兴趣而奋斗，不管他们的兴趣看起来是多么不寻常或者多么特殊
上面的是另外一种翻译，好像是要讨论评价学者的标准，个人感觉，仅供参考。

双非DIY美硕申请总结

使用道具举报

nightsky2004
UID: 155946

初级会员

Rank: 3 Rank: 3

声望: 0
寄托币: 1557
注册时间: 2004-2-19
精华: 0
帖子: 0

发表于 2005-2-14 00:00:37 |显示全部楼层

呀，忘了。
上面的翻译摘录自晚舟（eveningboat）分享的Issue老题分类（郑宁老师整理）。

使用道具举报

G猫
UID: 192988

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 2
寄托币: 1980
注册时间: 2005-1-21
精华: 3
帖子: 6

发表于 2005-2-14 13:56:31 |显示全部楼层

Should academic scholars and researchers be free to pursue whatever avenues of inquiry and research that interest them, no matter how unusual or idiosyncratic, as the speaker asserts? Or should they strive instead to focus on those areas that are most likely to benefit society? l strongly agree with the speaker, for three reasons.
这是老外范文,照他的开头来看,应该不是你说得那种翻译吧.到底哪种是正确的呀,这两种理解论证方向完全不同啊, 哪位牛牛指点一下迷津呢?

www.mumu-home.com

使用道具举报