- 最后登录
- 2008-7-2
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 1843
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-7-21
- 阅读权限
- 35
- 帖子
- 8
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1770
- UID
- 170801
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 1843
- 注册时间
- 2004-7-21
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 8
|
题目:
64The following appeared in a memo from the Dean of the College of Education at Omni State University.
'Only seven of our state's high schools offer even one course in Latin, but over 80 percent of the graduates who study Latin at those seven schools enroll in college. Furthermore, a recent study shows that students who have mastered Latin perform much better in logic and critical thinking. Thus, in order to increase the percentage of our high school students who graduate from college as well as to ensure that they receive a better education in critical thinking, Omni State University should begin an intensive program to prepare our future teachers to teach high school Latin.'
作文:
In this memorandum, the dean recommends Omega University to cancel student evaluation of professors. To support this recommendation, the author points out the inflation of overall student grades, as he or she claims, after the evaluation beginning 15 years ago. In addition, the author also provides the example of Alpha University to support the conclusion that the evaluation is a failure. At first glance, the author's conclusion appears to be somehow plausible, but further reflection reveals that the argument suffers from several logical fallacies.
To begin with, the author concludes that the rise of student grades is due to the students' evaluation of professors. However, the only evidence offered to support this claim is that the former occurred after the latter. Though it might be admitted that there are some correlations between this two events, this simple evidence is insufficient to draw a causal relationship between these two events. For instance, it is possible that professors in general have taken the students' advice and have made their courses better meet the students' needs, thus the grades increase.
In the second place, even if it is granted that the grade is overrated, without further analysis, Omega students' difficulty in job finding cannot be explained on the only fact of the grade inflation. Many factors, besides grade, can contribute to whether a student can successfully find a job-- for example, the relation between supply and demand in job market, or the student's ability in social activity. Lacking a detailed analysis and elimination of these factors, the claim that grade prevents the success of job finding is oversimplified.
Last but not the lease, the author makes a false analogy between Omega University and Alpha University. There may be some similarities between these two universities, but the differences might outweigh the similarities. For example, Alpha University maybe a leading university in the area, which helps its students to find jobs, while Omega University is only an ordinary one. Without considering the differences between these two universities, the conclusion based upon the analogy between them is unconvincing.
To sum up, without providing further evidence, the author has failed to establish a causal connection between the increase in grades and the student evaluation of professors. Moreover, grade might not be the cause, at least not the only cause of the students' difficulty in finding jobs. What's more, a hasty analogy between Omega University and Alpha University is insufficient to sustain the author's recommendation. |
|