argument217 欢迎砸砖 请留下链接 24小时内必回

zhoulin00001UID: 189304

------题目------
The following appeared in a brochure promoting the purchase of local franchises for a national chain of gyms.
'Now is the time to invest in a Power-Lift Gym franchise so that you can profit from opening one of our gyms in your town. Consider the current trends: Power-Lift Gyms are already popular among customers in 500 locations, and national surveys indicate increasing concern with weight loss and physical fitness. Furthermore, last year's sales of books and magazines on personal health totaled more than $50 million, and purchases of home exercise equipment almost doubled. Investing now in a Power-Lift Gym franchise will guarantee a quick profit.'
------正文------
In this argument, the arguer recommends that investing in a Power-Lift Gyms (PG) franchise will guarantee a quick profit. At first glance, this argument is very specific and convincing. A careful examination of it, however, would reveal how groundless it is.

Firstly, the mere fact that national surveys indicates increasing concern with weight loss and physical fitness is insufficient to conclude that people are willing to spend money and time on weight loss and physical fitness. First of all, concerning is not equal to doing, it is quite possible that although people have realize the importance of keep fit, they can not abandon their habits which have formed several years and deep-rooted in their body. Even so, they may not have the money and time to spend on fit-keeping program.

Besides, granted that people want and have time and money to keep fit, no evidence show that they want to go to gym to do so. As the arguer has said last year's sales of books and magazines on personal healthy totaled more than $50 million, people may more like to buy books and magazines to learn and do exercise at home. The evidence that purchase of home exercise equipment almost doubled, which is also provided by the arguer, also prove the assumption that people are inclined to do exercise at home rather than go to gym. In this sense, the investing on PG franchise can not make any profits and is nothing but a waste of money.

Finally, even if people are likely to go to gym to keep fit. It is still unadvisable to accept the recommendation that to invest in PG. Although PG is already popular among customers in 500 locations, no evidence shows that most of them make profits. We can not rule out the possibility that PG is popular just because of its cheap price and most of PG's gyms do not make profits. Granted that most of Gym can make profits, we should notice the difference among different places. PG may be suitable in the places the arguer citing, they may not cater people's interests in other locations and can not be popular. In this sense, blind investing may cause nothing but failure.

To sum up, this argument is not well reasoning and lack of credibility. To make the argument more convincing, the arguer should provide more evidence to show that most people would like to go to gym to keep fit and PG has the strongpoint superiority to other gyms.

iverUID: 198348

No.1 argument217 欢迎砸砖 请留下链接 24小时内必回
------题目------
The following appeared in a brochure promoting the purchase of local franchises for a national chain of gyms.
'Now is the time to invest in a Power-Lift Gym franchise so that you can profit from opening one of our gyms in your town. Consider the current trends:
Power-Lift Gyms are already popular among customers in 500 locations, and national surveys indicate increasing concern with weight loss and physical fitness.
Furthermore, last year's sales of books and magazines on personal health totaled more than $50 million, and purchases of home exercise equipment almost doubled. Investing now in a Power-Lift Gym franchise will guarantee a quick profit.'
------正文------
In this argument, the arguer recommends that investing in a Power-Lift Gyms (PG) franchise will guarantee a quick profit. At first glance, this argument is very specific and convincing. A careful examination of it, however, would reveal how groundless it is.最好能够列出arguer的少量的介绍auger的论据

Firstly, the mere fact that national surveys indicates increasing concern with weight loss and physical fitness is insufficient to conclude that people are willing to spend money and time on weight loss and physical fitness. First of all, concerning is not equal to doing太口语化, it is quite possible that although people have realize the importance of keep fit, they can not abandon their habits which have formed应该用被动语态 several years and deep-rooted in their body. Even so, they may not have the money and time to spend on fit-keeping program.
1 说了first of all,但是后面没有了其次之类的.
2  其实有很多可以攻击:可以有很多种方法减肥,
3  最好按照作者列出论据的先后攻击,建议先攻击500个locations

Besides, granted that people want and have time and money to keep fit, no evidence show that they want to go to gym to do so. As the arguer has said last year's sales of books and magazines on personal healthy totaled more than $50 million, people may more like to buy books and magazines to learn and do exercise at home. The evidence that purchase of home exercise equipment almost doubled, which is also provided by the arguer, also prove the assumption that people are inclined to do exercise at home rather than go to gym. In this sense, the investing on PG franchise can not make any profits and is nothing but a waste of money.

Finally, even if people are likely to go to gym to keep fit. It is still unadvisable to accept the recommendation that to invest in PG. Although PG is already popular among customers in 500 locations, no evidence shows that most of them make profits. We can not rule out the possibility that PG is popular just because of its cheap price and most of PG's gyms do not make profits. Granted that most of Gym can make profits, we should notice the difference among different places. PG may be suitable in the places the arguer citing, they may not caterto people's interests in other locations and can not be popular. In this sense, blind investing may cause nothing but failure.
说不定该地方已经有其他的类似PG'S gyms也可以用于反驳

To sum up, this argument is not well reasoning and lack of credibility. To make the argument more convincing, the arguer should provide more evidence to show that most people would like to go to gym to keep fit and PG has the strongpoint superiority to other gyms.

写的不错
加油!

zhoulin00001UID: 189304

多谢指教
我认为批驳要按逻辑顺序而不是原文的顺序，可能是个人的习惯吧